Join the Work

Get Involved

This project exists because one person cared enough to start it. It only becomes real — truly real — when more people care enough to continue it.

Where to Start

Four Ways In

Whether you've never used GitHub or you're a daily contributor, there is a place for you here.

Community
Join on Discord
The primary community space. Discuss policy, coordinate on proposals, review drafts, push back on ideas. Where everything starts.
Join Discord →
Open Source
View on GitHub
Every policy position, every version, every change — tracked in public. Submit issues, open pull requests, review the policy catalog directly.
GitHub →
Policy Work
Review a Proposal
Every policy position needs two independent sign-offs before it's adopted. Domain expertise — healthcare, housing, labor, justice — is especially valuable.
Open Issues →
Research
Source and Write
Source, verify, and expand policy positions. APA 7th edition citations required. Translate policy into language real people actually use.
Join Discussion →

Join the Community

The project is building on Discord. This is where contributors coordinate, discuss policy, review proposals, and push back on ideas. It is the best way to get involved right now.

Join on Discord → View on GitHub →
Policy Reviewers
Every proposal needs two independent sign-offs before it's adopted. The more reviewers we have, the more trustworthy the platform becomes. Domain expertise — healthcare, housing, labor, justice — is especially valuable.
Researchers & Writers
Source, verify, and expand policy positions. APA 7th edition citations required. The platform should be readable by anyone — translate policy into language real people actually use.
Community Organizers
Bring this to real communities. Organize discussions, gather feedback from people who aren't online, and connect the platform to existing efforts. Policy only matters if people can engage with it.
Graphic Designers
Visual identity, infographics, data visualization, social content. The platform has serious ideas — it needs visual communication to match.
Web Designers
UX, accessibility, information architecture, responsive design. This should feel as trustworthy and accessible as the work it represents.
Developers
DB migration pipeline, static site generator, contributor import tooling, frontend. Real engineering work — see the full description on GitHub.
Lawyers & Legal Analysts
Review proposals for constitutional validity, enforcement gaps, and unworkable language. Law students, paralegals, and policy law backgrounds are all welcome — every proposal needs legal eyes.
Operations & Admin
Coordination, contributor onboarding, task tracking, documentation, communication. The infrastructure that keeps a volunteer project actually running.

The Freedom and Dignity Project is an open effort to build something durable: a modern constitutional framework that protects human rights, limits the concentration of power, and guarantees the material conditions for every person to live with dignity. It is not a campaign. It is not a party. It is a framework — built in the open, available to anyone, meant to last.

At this moment, the project is early. That is not a caveat — it is an invitation. Early means the important decisions are still being made, the policy catalog is still being built, the research is still being gathered. Early means your contribution does not disappear into a bureaucracy. It shapes the thing itself.

There is work here for researchers, writers, policy experts, lawyers, designers, engineers, community organizers, and people who have simply read the platform and want to make it better. There is also work for people who have never used GitHub in their lives. Whatever your skills, there is a role for you.

This is the work. Not an abstraction about the work, not a think piece about why the work matters. The actual building of the thing.

The platform holds itself to a high standard of evidence: every factual claim must be sourced; counterevidence is acknowledged; positions are revised when the evidence demands it. That standard requires human reviewers — people who know the domain, who can catch errors, who can push back on weak arguments. That is not something AI can do for us.

If you are here, you already understand why this matters. The question is what you are willing to do about it.

Technical Contributors

The project needs engineers. Not to maintain a blog — to build the infrastructure for a serious policy platform. Here is what needs to be done:

DB Migration Pipeline
The policy catalog (SQLite) needs a reproducible build pipeline. Source: canonical markdown policy files and structured CSV imports. Output: a validated, version-controlled database with referential integrity.
Static Site Generator
Policy pillar pages are currently hand-authored HTML. They should be generated from the database. A build script that renders templated HTML from structured data, preserving all existing CSS and JS behavior.
Contributor Import Tooling
A workflow for non-technical contributors to submit policy proposals via structured GitHub issues, validated against the catalog schema, and imported through a review queue.
Frontend & Accessibility
WCAG 2.1 AA compliance audit, keyboard navigation testing, screen-reader testing across the full site. Plain-language accessibility for policy content written to ~8th-grade reading level.

View on GitHub →

Ready to join the community? Discord is the fastest way to connect with the project.

Join on Discord →