Establish comprehensive environmental protection, pollution control, biodiversity preservation, and sustainable agriculture frameworks that address climate change, corporate accountability, and the full scope of human en
Establish comprehensive environmental protection, pollution control, biodiversity preservation, and sustainable agriculture frameworks that address climate change, corporate accountability, and the full scope of human environmental impact from terrestrial ecosystems to orbital space.
Environmental systems are interconnected and finite. Human activity must operate within ecological limits, internalize environmental costs rather than externalizing them onto ecosystems and future generations, and preserve biodiversity and planetary habitability as a precondition for all other human flourishing.
Environmental policy in America suffers from fragmentation, regulatory capture, and systematic cost externalization:
Without comprehensive environmental governance that treats ecosystems as interconnected, requires internalization of costs, prevents greenwashing, and supports regenerative practices, we face accelerating ecological collapse that undermines the material basis for human civilization.
Access to clean, affordable water is a human right. Yet water rights law in the United States is a fragmented patchwork of state prior appropriation doctrines, riparian rights, federal reserved rights, and tribal treaty claims that frequently fails communities, especially in the drought-stressed West. Climate change is accelerating freshwater scarcity. Industrial agriculture, data centers, fracking, and corporate privatization are consuming and contaminating aquifers and rivers at rates that exceed natural replenishment. This platform establishes clean water access as a constitutional right and builds a comprehensive framework around conservation, infrastructure, equitable access, and next-generation supply development.
Regulatory floors are not enough. Clean water and clean air must be constitutional rights with standing to sue and meaningful remedies.
Polluters must internalize the costs they impose on communities, ecosystems, and future generations. Anti-greenwashing standards with teeth are essential.
The climate crisis requires structural policy responses — not just voluntary pledges. Carbon must have a price, and clean energy must replace fossil fuels systematically.
Ecosystems provide water filtration, pollination, climate regulation, and disease control. Biodiversity loss is not a sentimental concern — it is an infrastructure failure.
Transitioning from extractive industrial agriculture to regenerative practices protects soil, reduces water contamination, sequesters carbon, and builds long-term food security.
Environmental harm has always fallen disproportionately on low-income communities and communities of color. Justice requires addressing both current burdens and preventing future ones.
Environmental policy intersects with clean tech innovation, public health outcomes, resilient housing, and fair transitions for affected workers.
This pillar addresses environmental protection at multiple scales:
Pollution as systemic harm — Pollution is not just a localized problem but a systemic transfer of costs from polluters to the public. Air pollution causes respiratory disease and premature death. Water contamination requires expensive remediation and harms ecosystems. Noise pollution disrupts wildlife and degrades quality of life. Light pollution disrupts ecosystems and astronomical research. Each represents a cost that polluters avoid by shifting it onto others. Strong national standards with monitoring and enforcement prevent this cost externalization by making polluters internalize the harm they cause.
Biodiversity as infrastructure — Biodiversity is not a luxury — it is the functional infrastructure of ecosystems that provide water filtration, pollination, pest control, soil formation, and climate regulation. When infrastructure (highways, railways) disrupts migration corridors and habitat continuity, it degrades this ecological infrastructure. Wildlife crossings (bridges, tunnels, underpasses designed for animal passage) reconnect fragmented habitats and restore ecosystem function. This is not sentimentality — it is maintenance of the natural systems that human activity depends on.
Corporate accountability and anti-greenwashing — Markets fail to address environmental harm because companies can gain competitive advantage through misleading claims. "Green" branding increases sales without requiring actual environmental improvement. Effective anti-greenwashing requires standardized, verifiable environmental reporting that prevents selective disclosure and false claims. Companies must disclose full environmental impact (energy, water, emissions, waste, supply chain impacts) using standardized metrics that enable comparison and prevent manipulation.
Regenerative agriculture as system transition — Industrial agriculture is extractive: it depletes soil, requires increasing chemical inputs, and degrades long-term productivity. Regenerative agriculture builds soil health, increases water retention, sequesters carbon, supports biodiversity, and improves long-term yields. Transitioning from extractive to regenerative agriculture requires policy support: research funding, technical assistance, market incentives for regenerative practices, and elimination of subsidies that favor extractive approaches. This is not anti-agriculture — it is a transition toward farming systems that are productive over centuries rather than decades.
Labor and education connections — Worker protections (4-day work week, overtime pay, productivity-sharing from automation) and education reforms (student loan relief, anti-indoctrination protections) appear in this pillar because the policy catalog groups them with ENV/AGR scope codes. This reflects the reality that environmental, labor, and education policies are interconnected: sustainable agriculture requires educated farmers and fair labor practices; environmental justice requires addressing how environmental harms disproportionately impact workers and low-income communities; education shapes environmental awareness and technical capacity for ecological restoration.
Orbital environment — The expansion of human activity into orbital space creates new environmental challenges: space junk threatens functional satellites and future space access; massive satellite constellations (Starlink, OneWeb) interfere with astronomical research and observation; orbital debris accumulates without removal mechanisms. Rules for orbital sanitation, satellite deployment standards, and environmental impact assessments for space systems prevent the replication of terrestrial environmental failures in space.
Every rule in this pillar, organized by policy area. Active rules are current platform commitments. Partial rules are in development. Proposed rules are planned for future inclusion.
ENVR-REGS-0001
Proposed
Promote regenerative agriculture and sustainable farming practices
Regenerative agriculture — farming practices that build soil organic matter, reduce erosion, and restore the land's capacity to hold water — improves long-term farm productivity while capturing carbon from the atmosphere. Federal policy must promote and financially support these practices.
Regenerative agriculture transitions farming from extractive practices that deplete soil and require increasing chemical inputs toward practices that build long-term productivity and ecological health. Key regenerative practices include: - Cover cropping — Keeping soil covered year-round to prevent erosion, build organic matter, and support soil microbial life - Crop rotation — Alternating crops to break pest cycles, improve soil health, and reduce chemical dependency - Reduced tillage — Minimizing soil disturbance to preserve soil structure and carbon storage - Integrated livestock — Using grazing animals to cycle nutrients and manage vegetation - Agroforestry — Integrating trees and shrubs into farming systems for erosion control and biodiversity Regenerative agriculture sequesters carbon, increases water retention, reduces chemical runoff, supports biodiversity, and improves long-term yields. Transitioning requires policy support: - Research funding for regenerative techniques and outcomes - Technical assistance for farmers during transition - Market incentives for regenerative products (premium pricing, certification systems) - Elimination of subsidies favoring monoculture commodity production - Financial support during transition periods when yields may temporarily decrease - Education and training programs for regenerative practices This is not about reducing agricultural productivity — it is about building farming systems that remain productive over centuries rather than decades.
EDUC-FINC-0001
Proposed
Student loan debt forgiveness or large-scale restructuring
Student loan debt has reached crisis levels, forcing graduates into high-paying jobs regardless of social value and preventing career choices aligned with public service, environmental work, or community organizing. Broad federal student loan forgiveness addresses this by: - Reducing or eliminating unsustainable debt burdens that prevent economic mobility - Enabling career choices in fields like education, environmental protection, public health, and social services that serve public interest but are lower-paying - Addressing economic inequality where debt burdens fall disproportionately on students from low-income backgrounds - Correcting predatory lending practices that encouraged students to take on debt for low-return educational programs Debt relief must be paired with systemic restructuring to prevent re-accumulation of unsustainable debt. This includes: - Reducing or eliminating tuition at public colleges and universities - Regulating for-profit education institutions that produce poor outcomes - Expanding income-driven repayment programs with reasonable forgiveness timelines - Increasing direct federal funding for higher education to reduce reliance on tuition Student debt relief is an investment in human capital and enables a more educated workforce pursuing socially valuable work rather than being trapped by debt obligations.
EDUC-STDS-0001
Proposed
Education standards must include protections against political or ideological indoctrination
Education should cultivate critical thinking, evidence-based reasoning, and civic literacy rather than imposing partisan ideology or suppressing inconvenient facts. This rule protects against indoctrination from all directions: - Teaching scientific consensus (climate change, evolution, public health) without political interference or false "both sides" equivalence - Presenting accurate history including uncomfortable topics (slavery, genocide, civil rights struggles, labor movements) without ideological whitewashing - Developing critical thinking skills rather than requiring acceptance of particular political or religious viewpoints - Protecting teachers from retaliation for teaching evidence-based content that may conflict with political or religious ideology This is not about imposing "liberal" or "conservative" viewpoints — it is about protecting education from political manipulation. Students should learn to evaluate evidence, understand multiple perspectives, and form their own conclusions based on facts and reasoning. Protection against indoctrination includes: - Standards requiring evidence-based curriculum development - Protection for teachers who teach scientific consensus or historical facts - Prohibition of curriculum mandates that require teaching partisan political or religious ideology as fact - Transparency in curriculum development with input from educators, scientists, and historians rather than political appointees - Protection of academic freedom at all education levels
ENVR-BIOS-0001
Proposed
Protect and restore migratory patterns for animals through infrastructure and land-use planning
Animals that migrate seasonally — elk, salmon, monarch butterflies — need connected habitats to survive, but roads, fences, and development fragment their routes. This policy requires land managers and transportation planners to protect migration corridors so wildlife can move safely between habitats as seasons and climate conditions change.
Many species require large territories or migrate seasonally between breeding and feeding grounds. Infrastructure development (highways, railways, urban expansion) fragments habitats and disrupts migration routes, isolating populations, reducing genetic diversity, and degrading ecosystem function. This rule requires: - Infrastructure planning that considers wildlife migration corridors and habitat connectivity - Protection of critical migration routes and wildlife corridors through land-use planning - Coordination between federal, state, and local authorities to maintain habitat connectivity across jurisdictions - Requirements for wildlife impact assessments before major infrastructure projects - Restoration of degraded migration corridors through habitat reconnection projects Maintaining wildlife migration is not sentimental — it preserves ecosystem functions like pollination, seed dispersal, nutrient cycling, and predator-prey relationships that agriculture and human communities depend on.
ENVR-BIOS-0002
Proposed
Require wildlife crossings including bridges tunnels and related infrastructure where highways or railways disrupt migration routes and habitat continuity
Highways and railways cut across migration routes animals have used for thousands of years, killing millions of animals every year and isolating populations. Where roads and rail lines block key migration paths, wildlife crossings — bridges and tunnels built specifically for animals — must be constructed.
Wildlife crossings are bridges, tunnels, underpasses, and culverts designed to allow animals to safely cross highways and railways. They are cost-effective: a wildlife overpass costs $3–5 million but prevents millions in vehicle-wildlife collisions, preserves ecosystem connectivity, maintains genetic diversity, and reduces roadkill. Effective wildlife crossings require: - Identification of high-collision areas and critical migration corridors - Design appropriate to target species (large mammals need different structures than amphibians) - Fencing to guide animals to crossings rather than attempting to cross highways directly - Vegetation and terrain design that makes crossings attractive to wildlife - Monitoring to assess effectiveness and inform future designs Countries like the Netherlands and Canada have implemented extensive wildlife crossing systems with documented success. In Banff National Park, wildlife crossings reduced collisions by over 80% while maintaining population connectivity. This is proven, cost-effective infrastructure that should be standard practice.
ENVR-BIOS-0003
Proposed
Protect wildlife, habitats, and national parks from exploitation, degradation, and commercial encroachment
National parks and wildlife habitats belong to all Americans and must be protected from oil drilling, mining, logging, and commercial development. This policy requires adequate enforcement funding and legal mandates to restore habitats that have been damaged — not just stop new damage.
Wildlife populations, natural habitats, and national parks must be protected from extraction, commercial exploitation, degradation, and development that reduces their ecological integrity, with adequate funding for enforcement and restoration
National parks, wildlife refuges, and protected habitats are public assets held in trust for future generations. Weakening protections for mining, drilling, grazing, or commercial development on protected lands converts permanent public ecological value into short-term private profit — a classic case of privatizing gains while socializing losses. This rule requires: permanent protection of existing national parks and monuments from reduction or reclassification for commercial extraction; adequate funding for the National Park Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and other agencies responsible for habitat protection; strong enforcement of the Endangered Species Act and other wildlife protection laws; restoration funding for degraded habitats; and prohibition on commercial exploitation that degrades the ecological integrity of protected lands.
ENVR-BIOS-0004
Proposed
Require urban green spaces with public access in city planning and development standards
Parks, trees, and green spaces in cities reduce heat, improve air quality, support mental health, and give people outdoor places to gather. New urban development must include publicly accessible green space proportional to the number of people who live and work nearby.
City planning standards and development requirements must ensure adequate urban green spaces with genuine public access, preventing the concentration of parks and green infrastructure in wealthy neighborhoods while low-income communities lack access to nature
Access to green space — parks, urban forests, community gardens, greenways — is strongly associated with physical health, mental health, reduced heat island effects, storm water management, and community cohesion. In U.S. cities, green space access is sharply unequal: wealthy neighborhoods have significantly more park access than low-income and communities of color, which are also more likely to be near highways, industrial sites, and other environmental burdens. This environmental justice dimension means that urban green space requirements must include equity requirements — not just requiring green space somewhere in a city, but ensuring equitable distribution within reach of all residents. Requirements should include: minimum green space ratios per resident in new developments; requirements that new large developments include publicly accessible green space; protections against selling or developing existing parks; and investment in green infrastructure in neighborhoods with below-average park access.
ENVR-CORS-0001
Proposed
Establish general anti-greenwashing standards prohibiting false misleading or selectively incomplete environmental claims by companies organizations or public entities
Companies increasingly claim to be "sustainable," "carbon neutral," or "eco-friendly" without reliable evidence behind those claims, misleading consumers. This policy establishes enforceable federal standards against greenwashing — companies must back up environmental marketing claims with verified data or face legal consequences.
Greenwashing allows companies to gain competitive advantage through misleading environmental claims without reducing actual harm. Common greenwashing tactics include: - False carbon neutrality — Claiming "carbon neutral" based on questionable offsets (tree-planting that may not succeed, offsets that would have occurred anyway) while continuing high emissions - Selective disclosure — Highlighting minor environmental improvements while hiding larger impacts - Vague claims — Using terms like "eco-friendly," "sustainable," or "green" without specific, verifiable meaning - Hidden tradeoffs — Reducing one impact (switching from plastic to paper packaging) while increasing others (deforestation, higher carbon footprint from production) - Misleading imagery — Using nature imagery and green coloring to suggest environmental benefits that do not exist Effective anti-greenwashing prohibits: - False environmental claims (stating something is "biodegradable" when it requires specific industrial composting conditions) - Misleading claims (implying carbon neutrality through offsets while increasing absolute emissions) - Selectively incomplete claims (highlighting recycled content while hiding toxic manufacturing processes) - Unverifiable claims ("sustainable" without specific, measurable standards) Enforcement requires clear standards, mandatory reporting, and meaningful penalties that exceed the competitive advantage gained from greenwashing.
ENVR-CORS-0002
Proposed
Require standardized verifiable environmental reporting to support anti-greenwashing enforcement across industries
Anti-greenwashing rules only work if standardized, verifiable reporting backs them up. Companies must use consistent, transparent reporting formats that regulators can actually audit, so that environmental marketing claims can be measured against an objective standard.
Anti-greenwashing enforcement requires companies to disclose comprehensive environmental impact using standardized, verifiable metrics. This prevents selective reporting and enables meaningful comparison. Required disclosures should include: - Energy consumption — Total energy use by source (fossil fuels, renewable, nuclear) across full operations including supply chain - Water usage — Total water consumption, sources, discharge water quality, impact on local water resources - Emissions — Greenhouse gas emissions across all scopes (direct emissions, purchased energy, supply chain and product use) - Waste generation — Total waste by type, disposal methods, recycling and reuse rates - Supply chain impacts — Environmental impacts of upstream suppliers and raw material extraction - Product lifecycle — Environmental impacts of product use and end-of-life disposal Reporting must be: - Standardized — Using common metrics and methodologies to enable comparison - Verifiable — Subject to independent audit and validation - Comprehensive — Covering full lifecycle impacts, not just convenient highlights - Public — Accessible to consumers, researchers, and regulators - Regular — Updated annually or more frequently for real-time accountability This does not require perfection — it requires honesty. Companies can disclose high environmental impact if they are working to reduce it. The prohibition is on hiding, misrepresenting, or selectively disclosing impacts to gain unfair advantage.
ENVR-POLC-0001
Proposed
Establish stronger national standards to reduce and monitor noise pollution
Noise pollution — from traffic, airports, construction, and industrial equipment — damages hearing, raises stress, and disrupts sleep for tens of millions of Americans. The federal government must set stronger standards for monitoring and reducing noise pollution across industries and transportation systems.
Noise pollution from highways, airports, industrial facilities, railways, and data centers (including AI data centers with loud cooling systems) imposes significant costs on communities: - Health impacts: sleep disruption, cardiovascular stress, cognitive impairment in children - Economic impacts: reduced property values, decreased productivity, healthcare costs - Quality of life degradation: inability to enjoy outdoor spaces, constant background noise Current noise regulation is fragmented and often delegated to local jurisdictions, creating sacrifice zones where communities bear excessive noise burdens. Strong national standards prevent localities from becoming dumping grounds for noise externalities. Standards should cover: - Transportation noise — Highways, railways, airports with noise mitigation requirements (sound barriers, route planning, operational restrictions) - Industrial noise — Manufacturing, data centers, extraction operations with limits on noise emissions and requirements for mitigation - Construction noise — Time restrictions, equipment standards, mitigation requirements - Commercial noise — Limits on outdoor amplification, delivery hours, mechanical equipment Enforcement requires: - Noise monitoring systems in affected areas - Complaint mechanisms with responsive enforcement - Penalties for violations that exceed mitigation costs - Requirements for noise impact assessments before new development Noise pollution is preventable through design, technology, and operational practices. National standards ensure that these measures are implemented rather than noise costs being externalized onto communities.
ENVR-POLC-0002
Proposed
Establish stronger national standards to reduce and monitor light pollution
Artificial light at night disrupts human sleep patterns, interferes with nocturnal wildlife, and has made the night sky invisible to most Americans. Stronger national standards for light pollution will protect both human health and the natural environment that depends on darkness.
Light pollution from excessive outdoor lighting disrupts ecosystems and human activities: - Ecosystem disruption — Bird migration routes disrupted by urban light, insect populations collapse from attraction to artificial light, nocturnal predator-prey relationships disrupted, plant phenology (seasonal timing) thrown off by artificial light - Astronomical interference — Ground-based telescopes increasingly unusable due to skyglow, professional and amateur astronomy degraded, loss of cultural and scientific connection to night sky - Human health impacts — Sleep disruption from excessive outdoor lighting, circadian rhythm disruption linked to health problems - Energy waste — Billions spent on unnecessary or poorly designed outdoor lighting National standards for outdoor lighting can reduce these harms without eliminating necessary illumination: - Shielding requirements — Light fixtures must direct light downward rather than horizontally or upward (reducing skyglow and glare) - Intensity limits — Restrictions on overlighting (parking lots, building facades, billboards) - Timing controls — Reduced lighting intensity or complete shutdown during late-night hours when activity is minimal - Color temperature standards — Limiting blue-spectrum light that is particularly disruptive to ecosystems and astronomy Effective outdoor lighting for safety and navigation does not require wasteful, poorly designed systems that light the sky rather than the ground. Standards should be developed in coordination with: - Dark sky advocates and astronomical community - Ecologists studying wildlife impacts - Lighting engineers and designers - Municipal planning authorities - Energy efficiency experts
ENVR-SPCS-0001
Proposed
Establish rules for orbital sanitation and removal or mitigation of space junk
Thousands of decommissioned satellites and rocket stages in orbit — space debris, also called space junk — create growing collision risks for active satellites, space stations, and future missions. Federal rules must require companies to actively remove or mitigate their spent hardware.
Space debris (defunct satellites, rocket stages, collision fragments) accumulates in orbital space and threatens functional satellites, space stations, and future space access. Without removal mechanisms, orbital debris will continue to accumulate until densely used orbits become unusable (Kessler syndrome — cascading collisions create exponentially increasing debris). Orbital sanitation requires: - Active debris removal — Development and deployment of systems to capture and de-orbit large debris objects - Mandatory de-orbiting — Requirements for satellites and rocket stages to de-orbit at end of life (either controlled descent or orbital decay within specified timeframe) - Collision avoidance — Requirements for tracking, notification, and maneuvering to avoid debris collisions - Design standards — Requirements for satellites to be designed for end-of-life disposal (passivation to prevent explosions, de-orbiting capability) - Liability for debris creation — Operators responsible for costs of debris removal and damages from debris collisions - International coordination — Orbital debris is a global commons problem requiring international treaties and coordination This is not hypothetical — the International Space Station regularly maneuvers to avoid debris, operational satellites are increasingly threatened, and the number of debris objects is growing exponentially. Rules for orbital sanitation are urgent to prevent loss of space access.
ENVR-SPCS-0002
Proposed
Require stronger regulation of private satellite deployment to prevent interference with scientific research astronomy and observation
Rapid deployment of large private satellite constellations creates radio frequency interference and light pollution that affects scientific research and astronomy. Stronger regulation of private satellite deployment is needed before the orbital environment becomes too congested for science and safety.
Massive satellite constellations (Starlink planning 40,000+ satellites, OneWeb, Amazon Kuiper, others) create multiple forms of interference with astronomical research: - Optical interference — Satellites create bright streaks across telescope images, contaminating observations - Radio interference — Satellite downlinks interfere with radio telescope observations across multiple frequency bands - Orbital crowding — Large constellations restrict orbital access and increase collision risk While satellite internet provides valuable services, deployment must be regulated to prevent irreversible harm to scientific research: - Brightness limits — Requirements for satellites to minimize reflectivity (dark coatings, orientation to minimize sun reflection) - Radio coordination — Frequency allocation that protects radio astronomy bands from interference - Constellation size limits — Caps on number of satellites to prevent orbital crowding and collision risk - Deployment coordination — Requirement for consultation with astronomical community before approval - Environmental impact assessments — Comprehensive assessment of impacts on astronomy, orbital debris risk, and atmospheric reentry pollution before large constellation approval Current FCC approval processes do not adequately consider astronomical impacts. By the time harm is evident, tens of thousands of satellites may be deployed. Stronger regulation must occur before deployment, not as attempted remediation afterward.
ENVR-SPCS-0003
Proposed
Private satellite systems must meet environmental scientific and orbital-safety standards before approval and expansion
Private companies launching satellite networks must meet environmental, scientific, and orbital safety standards before they are approved to deploy — not after thousands of satellites are already in orbit. Regulatory approval must come before launch, not be negotiated after the fact.
This rule establishes comprehensive standards for satellite system approval covering: - Atmospheric reentry pollution impacts from large numbers of satellites burning up - Manufacturing environmental footprint (energy, materials, toxic chemicals) - Launch environmental impacts (rocket emissions, noise pollution, safety risks) - Optical brightness limits and mitigation requirements - Radio frequency interference protections for research bands - Coordination requirements with astronomical community - Debris creation risk assessment and mitigation - Collision avoidance capability and coordination - End-of-life disposal plans and enforcement - Insurance and liability for debris and collisions Approval should be conditional on: - Demonstrated compliance with standards - Independent scientific review of impacts - Ongoing monitoring and compliance enforcement - Ability to revoke approval or halt expansion for non-compliance Expansion of existing systems (adding thousands more satellites to existing constellations) should require renewed approval demonstrating continued compliance with standards. This prevents the lock-in problem where companies deploy thousands of satellites rapidly before regulation can respond, then argue that removal would be impractical or economically harmful.
LABR-WRKS-0001
Proposed
Establish a standard 4-day 32-hour work week without reduction in pay
Productivity gains from automation, AI, and technological advancement have not been shared with workers through reduced working hours. Instead, productivity gains are captured as profit or as pressure for increased output. A 4-day, 32-hour work week shares productivity gains with workers while maintaining or increasing pay. Benefits include: - Worker wellbeing — Reduced stress, better work-life balance, improved physical and mental health - Economic stimulus — Increased consumer spending and leisure activity - Employment — More jobs as companies hire additional workers to cover shifts - Productivity — Studies show productivity often increases with reduced hours due to improved focus, reduced burnout, and better morale - Sustainability — Reduced consumption pressure, more time for non-market activities (civic participation, community building, environmental stewardship) Implementation can be phased: - Initial standards apply to large companies and government employment - Gradual expansion to smaller businesses with support during transition - Sector-specific variations where needed (healthcare, emergency services) - Overtime rules adjusted to reflect new standard (overtime after 32 hours) This is not about working less — it is about sharing the benefits of productivity gains. When automation and AI increase output per worker, workers should benefit through reduced hours rather than just through higher profits for capital.
LABR-WRKS-0002
Proposed
Productivity gains from AI and automation must benefit workers through reduced working hours rather than increased workload
AI and automation enable workers to produce more output in less time. Without policy intervention, these gains are captured as: - Increased profit — Companies capture productivity gains without sharing with workers - Increased workload — Workers are expected to use AI/automation to produce more output in the same time rather than same output in less time - Job elimination — Automation displaces workers without sharing gains with remaining workers or creating new opportunities This rule requires that productivity gains from AI and automation benefit workers through reduced working hours. Mechanisms include: - Linking work hour reductions to demonstrated productivity gains from AI/automation adoption - Negotiation frameworks where workers share in benefits of automation through reduced hours, increased pay, or both - Protection against workload intensification where AI tools are used to increase expected output without reducing hours - Requirements for companies to assess automation impacts on workers and negotiate transition plans This is about ensuring that technological progress benefits workers rather than just extracting more labor. If AI enables a task that previously took 40 hours to be completed in 32 hours, workers should work 32 hours at the same or higher pay, not work 40 hours doing more tasks.
LABR-WRKS-0003
Proposed
Guarantee overtime pay protections for all workers including salaried employees subject to defined thresholds and safeguards
Overtime pay requirements currently exempt many salaried employees, enabling exploitation where workers are classified as "salaried" to avoid overtime requirements while being expected to work 50–60+ hours per week. This rule extends overtime protections to salaried employees with appropriate thresholds: - Salary level — Overtime protections apply to salaried employees below a specified income threshold (e.g., $100,000), adjusted for inflation and regional cost of living - Actual duties — Exemption requires genuine executive, administrative, or professional duties, not just job title - Industry standards — Sector-specific thresholds reflecting typical compensation patterns - Time-and-a-half pay for hours beyond standard work week (32 hours under 4-day week, or phased transition) - Prohibition of coerced overtime (workers can refuse excessive overtime without retaliation) - Limits on total hours (e.g., maximum 50–60 hours per week including overtime) to prevent exploitation - Requirements for accurate time tracking even for salaried employees - Whistleblower protections for reporting violations - Private right of action for workers to sue for unpaid overtime - Penalties for misclassification and wage theft This prevents the exploitation where workers are given "manager" titles without management authority, paid low salaries, and expected to work unlimited hours without overtime pay. This pillar contains 15 formalized rules across four scope codes: - AGR (Agriculture): 1 rule — Regenerative agriculture promotion - EDU (Education): 2 rules — Student loan forgiveness, anti-indoctrination protections - ENV (Environment): 9 rules — Biodiversity protection (2), corporate accountability (2), pollution control (2), orbital environment (3) - LAB (Labor): 3 rules — 4-day work week, automation productivity-sharing, overtime protections These rules reflect the interconnected nature of environmental, labor, and education policies. Environmental protection requires addressing how corporate power externalizes costs, how labor practices shape environmental impacts, and how education influences capacity for ecological restoration and civic engagement in environmental governance.
ENVR-SYSR-0001
Included
Waste reduction, recyclability, repairability, and durability requirements
Waste reduction, recyclability, repairability, and durability are not separate issues — they must be integrated into a unified regulatory framework across environmental, consumer protection, and product safety rules. Fragmented rules let manufacturers evade accountability for the waste their products generate.
Waste reduction, recyclability, repairability, and durability requirements must be integrated across consumer protection, manufacturing, housing, and infrastructure policy.
Core rule in the ENV-SYS family establishing: Waste reduction, recyclability, repairability, and durability requirements must be integrated across consumer protection, manufacturing, housing, and infrastructure policy.
ENVR-CLNS-0001
Included
Environmental policy must include active cleanup and remediation
Preventing new pollution is only half the job — the contamination already in our soil, water, and air must be actively cleaned up. Environmental policy must include funded remediation of existing contamination, not just rules about what companies can't do going forward.
Environmental policy must include active cleanup and remediation of existing pollution, waste accumulation, and ecological damage rather than focusing only on prevention of future harm.
Core rule in the ENV-CLN family establishing: Environmental policy must include active cleanup and remediation of existing pollution, waste accumulation, and ecological damage rather than focusing only on prevention of future .
ENVR-CLNS-0002
Included
Polluters and responsible entities must bear the cost
When a company dumps toxic waste or pollutes a community's water, the people who caused the harm — not the taxpayers or the affected residents — must pay for the cleanup. Polluters pay; communities should not subsidize the damage done to them.
Polluters and responsible entities must bear the cost of cleanup, remediation, and restoration where responsibility can be identified.
Core rule in the ENV-CLN family establishing: Polluters and responsible entities must bear the cost of cleanup, remediation, and restoration where responsibility can be identified.
ENVR-CLNS-0003
Included
Liability rules for environmental contamination must be strong
Strong legal liability for pollution cleanup makes it cheaper to manage waste responsibly than to cut corners and face massive cleanup bills later. Weak liability rules let polluters profit while communities pay the price in contaminated water and poisoned soil.
Liability rules for environmental contamination must be strong enough to prevent firms from treating cleanup costs as an acceptable externality.
Core rule in the ENV-CLN family establishing: Liability rules for environmental contamination must be strong enough to prevent firms from treating cleanup costs as an acceptable externality.
ENVR-CLNS-0004
Included
Governments must have authority and dedicated funding
When the company responsible for pollution has gone bankrupt, disappeared, or refused to act, government must have the legal authority and dedicated funding to step in and get the cleanup done. Communities should not wait decades for remediation because a polluter won't pay.
Governments must have authority and dedicated funding to clean up pollution and waste where responsible parties are unknown, defunct, insolvent, or beyond reach.
Core rule in the ENV-CLN family establishing: Governments must have authority and dedicated funding to clean up pollution and waste where responsible parties are unknown, defunct, insolvent, or beyond reach.
ENVR-CLNS-0005
Included
Cleanup funding mechanisms should include dedicated public funds
Paying for environmental cleanups requires reliable funding — through dedicated public funds, required corporate financial reserves, and mandatory bonds (deposits held in trust) that high-risk industries must post before they begin polluting activities. The money for cleanup must exist before it is needed, not after.
Cleanup funding mechanisms should include dedicated public funds, industry assessments, bonds, or other durable financing structures.
Core rule in the ENV-CLN family establishing: Cleanup funding mechanisms should include dedicated public funds, industry assessments, bonds, or other durable financing structures.
ENVR-CLNS-0006
Included
Federal, state, and local governments must coordinate active
Pollution does not respect jurisdictional boundaries — federal, state, and local governments must coordinate their cleanup programs so contaminated sites do not fall through the gaps between agencies. Shared responsibility with clear accountability is the only way to address the full backlog of contaminated land and water.
Federal, state, and local governments must coordinate active cleanup of plastics, synthetic waste, toxic runoff, and debris from rivers, lakes, wetlands, coastlines, and oceans.
Core rule in the ENV-CLN family establishing: Federal, state, and local governments must coordinate active cleanup of plastics, synthetic waste, toxic runoff, and debris from rivers, lakes, wetlands, coastlines, and oceans.
ENVR-CLNS-0007
Included
Environmental cleanup programs must prioritize areas where waste
Not all contaminated sites are equally urgent. Cleanup programs must prioritize the sites where pollution poses the greatest immediate risk to human health — especially where vulnerable people live near contamination — and to the ecosystems that cannot wait for bureaucratic scheduling.
Environmental cleanup programs must prioritize areas where waste accumulation threatens drinking water, ecosystems, food systems, public health, or vulnerable communities.
Core rule in the ENV-CLN family establishing: Environmental cleanup programs must prioritize areas where waste accumulation threatens drinking water, ecosystems, food systems, public health, or vulnerable communities.
ENVR-CLNS-0008
Included
Public agencies must fund research, monitoring, and remediation
New chemicals are introduced faster than science can study their long-term effects. Government agencies must fund ongoing research, monitoring, and proactive response to emerging contaminants before harm to people or nature becomes irreversible.
Public agencies must fund research, monitoring, and remediation strategies for microplastics and other persistent contaminants in water, soil, food systems, and human environments.
Core rule in the ENV-CLN family establishing: Public agencies must fund research, monitoring, and remediation strategies for microplastics and other persistent contaminants in water, soil, food systems, and human environments.
ENVR-CLNS-0009
Included
Cleanup and remediation standards must address persistent synthetic
PFAS ("forever chemicals") and microplastics are virtually indestructible synthetic materials that have spread across the environment and accumulate in human bodies. Cleanup and remediation standards must specifically address how to remove and contain these persistent pollutants — not just conventional hazardous wastes.
Cleanup and remediation standards must address persistent synthetic contamination even where traditional waste removal methods are insufficient.
Core rule in the ENV-CLN family establishing: Cleanup and remediation standards must address persistent synthetic contamination even where traditional waste removal methods are insufficient.
ENVR-CLNS-0010
Included
Contaminated industrial, commercial, and waste sites must be
Old factories, mine sites, and waste dumps — often located in or near residential communities — leave behind contaminated soil and groundwater that can harm health for generations. These contaminated industrial sites must be assessed, cleaned up, and restored to safe conditions.
Contaminated industrial, commercial, and waste sites must be remediated to safe standards before reuse, redevelopment, or continued occupancy.
Core rule in the ENV-CLN family establishing: Contaminated industrial, commercial, and waste sites must be remediated to safe standards before reuse, redevelopment, or continued occupancy.
ENVR-CLNS-0011
Included
Brownfield and contaminated-site policy should prioritize remediation, community
Cleaning up contaminated industrial sites is an opportunity as well as an obligation. Community members must have meaningful input into what happens next, and redevelopment should benefit the neighborhood that lived with the contamination — not just outside investors.
Brownfield and contaminated-site policy should prioritize remediation, community safety, and long-term ecological restoration rather than cosmetic reuse alone.
Core rule in the ENV-CLN family establishing: Brownfield and contaminated-site policy should prioritize remediation, community safety, and long-term ecological restoration rather than cosmetic reuse alone.
ENVR-CLNS-0012
Included
Cleanup policy must include restoration of habitats, waterways
Pollution does not only harm people — it poisons rivers, wetlands, forests, and the wildlife that depends on them. Full cleanup means restoring damaged ecosystems to health, not just reducing contamination to a minimum legal threshold.
Cleanup policy must include restoration of habitats, waterways, soils, and ecological systems damaged by pollution, extraction, or unmanaged waste.
Core rule in the ENV-CLN family establishing: Cleanup policy must include restoration of habitats, waterways, soils, and ecological systems damaged by pollution, extraction, or unmanaged waste.
ENVR-CLNS-0013
Included
Environmental restoration should prioritize biodiversity, water quality, soil
When restoring a damaged ecosystem, the standard of success must be a functioning, resilient natural environment — with healthy water, diverse wildlife, and living soil — not just checking a compliance box. Biodiversity and long-term ecological health are the real measures of a genuine restoration.
Environmental restoration should prioritize biodiversity, water quality, soil health, and long-term ecosystem resilience.
Core rule in the ENV-CLN family establishing: Environmental restoration should prioritize biodiversity, water quality, soil health, and long-term ecosystem resilience.
ENVR-CLNS-0014
Included
Communities affected by environmental contamination must have access
People who have lived near contaminated sites have often already suffered real health consequences — cancer, birth defects, chronic illness. They must have access to health monitoring, affordable medical care, and legal tools to seek compensation for the harm done to them.
Communities affected by environmental contamination must have access to clear information, health guidance, remediation plans, and meaningful participation in cleanup decisions.
Core rule in the ENV-CLN family establishing: Communities affected by environmental contamination must have access to clear information, health guidance, remediation plans, and meaningful participation in cleanup decisions.
ENVR-CLNS-0015
Included
Cleanup progress, contamination data, and remediation outcomes
Communities have a right to know about contamination near their homes and whether cleanup is actually working. Cleanup progress, contamination data, and remediation outcomes must be publicly reported in formats that residents can actually understand and use.
Cleanup progress, contamination data, and remediation outcomes must be publicly reported in accessible and standardized formats.
Core rule in the ENV-CLN family establishing: Cleanup progress, contamination data, and remediation outcomes must be publicly reported in accessible and standardized formats.
ENVR-CLNS-0016
Included
Cleanup obligations may not be delayed indefinitely through
Polluters must not be allowed to run out the clock through endless legal challenges while contamination continues to harm communities. Cleanup obligations cannot be delayed indefinitely — there must be enforceable deadlines and real consequences for inaction.
Cleanup obligations may not be delayed indefinitely through procedural abuse, corporate restructuring, bankruptcy tactics, or jurisdictional fragmentation.
Core rule in the ENV-CLN family establishing: Cleanup obligations may not be delayed indefinitely through procedural abuse, corporate restructuring, bankruptcy tactics, or jurisdictional fragmentation.
ENVR-CLNS-0017
Included
Repeated failure to remediate known contamination must trigger
Companies that repeatedly ignore known contamination — despite warnings, penalties, and court orders — must face escalating consequences, up to and including direct federal intervention and takeover of the cleanup. There must be a backstop when the regulatory process repeatedly fails.
Repeated failure to remediate known contamination must trigger escalating penalties, loss of permits, or direct government intervention.
Core rule in the ENV-CLN family establishing: Repeated failure to remediate known contamination must trigger escalating penalties, loss of permits, or direct government intervention.
ENVR-AUDT-0001
Included
Corporations must file standardized environmental audits
Large corporations must file detailed, standardized reports on their environmental impact four times a year so regulators and the public can hold them accountable. Quarterly reporting catches problems faster than annual disclosures and prevents companies from hiding their true environmental footprint.
Corporations must file standardized environmental audits on a quarterly basis.
Core rule in the ENV-AUD family establishing: Corporations must file standardized environmental audits on a quarterly basis.
ENVR-AUDT-0002
Included
Audits must include water use, emissions, pollutants, waste
Environmental audits must cover the full picture of a company's impact — water use, air emissions, pollutants released, and waste generated. Partial or selective disclosures do not give communities and regulators the information they need to protect public health.
Audits must include water use, emissions, pollutants, waste, and environmental impact metrics.
Core rule in the ENV-AUD family establishing: Audits must include water use, emissions, pollutants, waste, and environmental impact metrics.
ENVR-AUDT-0003
Included
Audits must include both internal reporting and multiple
To catch false reporting, audits must include both a company's own internal data and verification from multiple independent outside sources. Self-reported data alone is too easy to manipulate — independent verification is the only check that works.
Audits must include both internal reporting and multiple independent third-party audits.
Core rule in the ENV-AUD family establishing: Audits must include both internal reporting and multiple independent third-party audits.
ENVR-AUDT-0004
Included
Auditors, including individuals, are criminally liable for fraudulent
Individuals who sign fraudulent environmental audits — not just their employers — can face personal criminal liability. Knowing you personally face prison time for certifying a false report makes honest auditing far more likely than fines that corporations can write off.
Auditors, including individuals, are criminally liable for fraudulent reporting, misrepresentation, or negligence.
Core rule in the ENV-AUD family establishing: Auditors, including individuals, are criminally liable for fraudulent reporting, misrepresentation, or negligence.
ENVR-AUDT-0005
Included
Collusion, conspiracy, or coordinated fraud in environmental reporting
When companies coordinate to file false or misleading environmental reports together, the penalties are much steeper than for individual fraud. Organized cover-ups of environmental harm are treated as the serious crimes they are.
Collusion, conspiracy, or coordinated fraud in environmental reporting constitutes criminal enterprise and may be prosecuted under racketeering statutes.
Core rule in the ENV-AUD family establishing: Collusion, conspiracy, or coordinated fraud in environmental reporting constitutes criminal enterprise and may be prosecuted under racketeering statutes.
ENVR-EPRS-0001
Included
Producers are responsible for the full lifecycle
When a company makes a product, it is responsible for what happens to that product at the end of its life — not just the consumer or the local trash service. Producers must fund and participate in systems to collect, sort, and recycle the products they sell.
Producers are responsible for the full lifecycle of their products, including collection, recycling, disposal, and environmental impact mitigation.
Core rule in the ENV-EPR family establishing: Producers are responsible for the full lifecycle of their products, including collection, recycling, disposal, and environmental impact mitigation.
ENVR-EPRS-0002
Included
Producers must fund and participate in systems
Companies that design products knowing they will be difficult to recycle should pay for that difficulty — not pass the cost onto local governments and taxpayers. Producer-funded collection and recycling programs make the true cost of a product's disposal visible before it's sold.
Producers must fund and participate in systems for recovery, recycling, or safe disposal of materials they introduce into the market.
Core rule in the ENV-EPR family establishing: Producers must fund and participate in systems for recovery, recycling, or safe disposal of materials they introduce into the market.
ENVR-EPRS-0003
Included
Products that are difficult to recycle, hazardous
Single-use, hard-to-recycle, or hazardous products cost far more to manage than their price tags suggest — those costs are simply paid by communities and the environment rather than the company that made them. Fees and restrictions on these products ensure their true environmental cost is built into what companies and consumers actually pay.
Products that are difficult to recycle, hazardous, or environmentally persistent must be subject to higher responsibility, restrictions, or phase-out requirements.
Core rule in the ENV-EPR family establishing: Products that are difficult to recycle, hazardous, or environmentally persistent must be subject to higher responsibility, restrictions, or phase-out requirements.
ENVR-ESCS-0001
Included
Waste systems must be designed to prevent materials
Plastics, chemicals, and other waste must be contained at every step — from factory to consumer to disposal — so they cannot escape into rivers, oceans, and wild places. Leakage into the natural environment is a system failure, and those systems must be designed to prevent it.
Waste systems must be designed to prevent materials from escaping into natural environments, including waterways, oceans, and ecosystems.
Core rule in the ENV-ESC family establishing: Waste systems must be designed to prevent materials from escaping into natural environments, including waterways, oceans, and ecosystems.
ENVR-ESCS-0002
Included
Entities responsible for production, transport, or disposal
Every company that makes, ships, or disposes of waste products is responsible for keeping those materials contained throughout the full chain — not just while the product is in their own hands. Responsibility does not end when goods leave the factory.
Entities responsible for production, transport, or disposal of materials must implement safeguards to prevent leakage, runoff, or dispersal into the environment.
Core rule in the ENV-ESC family establishing: Entities responsible for production, transport, or disposal of materials must implement safeguards to prevent leakage, runoff, or dispersal into the environment.
ENVR-ESCS-0003
Included
Release of plastics, microplastics, synthetic materials, or persistent
Tiny plastic particles ("microplastics") and synthetic chemicals are now found in the most remote places on Earth and in human blood, lungs, and breast milk. Releasing plastics, microplastics, or persistent synthetic materials into the environment must be prohibited, and existing contamination must be remediated.
Release of plastics, microplastics, synthetic materials, or persistent waste into natural systems must be minimized, monitored, and subject to enforcement.
Core rule in the ENV-ESC family establishing: Release of plastics, microplastics, synthetic materials, or persistent waste into natural systems must be minimized, monitored, and subject to enforcement.
ENVR-INDS-0001
Included
Industrial processes must minimize waste output and prevent
Factories and industrial operations must minimize the waste they generate and prevent any waste from leaking into surrounding communities and ecosystems. Contained waste cannot contaminate the air, soil, or water that neighbors depend on.
Industrial processes must minimize waste output and prevent release of materials into surrounding ecosystems.
Core rule in the ENV-IND family establishing: Industrial processes must minimize waste output and prevent release of materials into surrounding ecosystems.
ENVR-INDS-0002
Included
Facilities must monitor, report, and mitigate waste leakage
If cleaner, more effective waste-reduction technology exists, industries must adopt it — not run outdated, polluting processes indefinitely just because they already own the old equipment. Best-available-technology requirements drive continuous improvement rather than locking in the worst practices of the past.
Facilities must monitor, report, and mitigate waste leakage, including microplastics and synthetic materials.
Core rule in the ENV-IND family establishing: Facilities must monitor, report, and mitigate waste leakage, including microplastics and synthetic materials.
ENVR-INFS-0001
Included
Waste management infrastructure must prevent leakage into
The systems that move and process waste — landfills, pipes, trucks, transfer stations — must be designed and operated so nothing escapes into the environment. Infrastructure failures that allow leachate, runoff, or toxic emissions are preventable and must be prevented.
Waste management infrastructure must prevent leakage into the environment through proper containment, transport, and processing systems.
Core rule in the ENV-INF family establishing: Waste management infrastructure must prevent leakage into the environment through proper containment, transport, and processing systems.
ENVR-INFS-0002
Included
Landfills, transfer stations, and waste facilities must meet
Landfills, waste treatment plants, and waste transport vehicles must meet current environmental standards — not the outdated requirements in place when they were built decades ago. Upgrading aging waste infrastructure protects water, air, and soil.
Landfills, transfer stations, and waste facilities must meet strict environmental containment standards to prevent runoff, leakage, and pollution.
Core rule in the ENV-INF family establishing: Landfills, transfer stations, and waste facilities must meet strict environmental containment standards to prevent runoff, leakage, and pollution.
ENVR-INFS-0003
Included
Stormwater, wastewater, and drainage systems must include filtration
Waste facilities — landfills, incinerators, hazardous waste sites — have historically been placed in low-income communities and communities of color at far higher rates, compounding existing health burdens. New waste facility siting must not add more burden to already overburdened neighborhoods.
Stormwater, wastewater, and drainage systems must include filtration or mitigation to reduce plastic and waste flow into natural systems.
Core rule in the ENV-INF family establishing: Stormwater, wastewater, and drainage systems must include filtration or mitigation to reduce plastic and waste flow into natural systems.
ENVR-PKGS-0001
Included
Excessive packaging and non-essential materials must be reduced
Layers of unnecessary packaging — multi-layer plastic pouches, mixed-material wrapping, decorative boxes inside boxes — generate enormous waste that largely cannot be recycled. Regulations must set limits on excessive packaging and require that what remains is actually designed to be recovered and reused.
Excessive packaging and non-essential materials must be reduced through regulation and design standards.
Core rule in the ENV-PKG family establishing: Excessive packaging and non-essential materials must be reduced through regulation and design standards.
ENVR-PKGS-0002
Included
Reusable, refillable, or minimal packaging systems should be
Packaging made from materials that cannot be separated — foil bonded to plastic, mixed-material laminates — goes directly to the landfill even when consumers try to recycle it. These non-separable packaging types must be phased out.
Reusable, refillable, or minimal packaging systems should be prioritized over single-use formats.
Core rule in the ENV-PKG family establishing: Reusable, refillable, or minimal packaging systems should be prioritized over single-use formats.
ENVR-PLSS-0001
Included
Production and use of single-use plastics and non-essential
Single-use plastics — straws, bags, utensils, coffee cups — are used for minutes and persist in the environment for centuries. Production and use of these items must be reduced through fees, restrictions, and phase-outs, with genuinely sustainable alternatives developed to replace them.
Production and use of single-use plastics and non-essential disposable materials should be reduced, restricted, or phased out where viable alternatives exist.
Core rule in the ENV-PLS family establishing: Production and use of single-use plastics and non-essential disposable materials should be reduced, restricted, or phased out where viable alternatives exist.
ENVR-PLSS-0002
Included
Microplastic generation from products, manufacturing processes, and material
Products labeled "biodegradable" or "compostable" often break down only under specific industrial conditions that most communities cannot provide, misleading consumers into thinking they are making a green choice. Any alternative to plastic must meet verified environmental standards and actually decompose in realistic conditions.
Microplastic generation from products, manufacturing processes, and material degradation must be limited through design standards and regulation.
Core rule in the ENV-PLS family establishing: Microplastic generation from products, manufacturing processes, and material degradation must be limited through design standards and regulation.
ENVR-PLSS-0003
Included
Synthetic materials that persist in ecosystems without safe
Single-use plastics in food service — cups, lids, containers, cutlery — are among the largest sources of plastic waste entering waterways and oceans. Fees, restrictions, and redesign requirements must drive a real shift away from throwaway plastic in food and beverage service.
Synthetic materials that persist in ecosystems without safe degradation pathways must be regulated or replaced with safer alternatives where feasible.
Core rule in the ENV-PLS family establishing: Synthetic materials that persist in ecosystems without safe degradation pathways must be regulated or replaced with safer alternatives where feasible.
ENVR-RECS-0001
Included
Recycling systems must be expanded, standardized, and modernized
The current patchwork of local recycling programs — each with different rules for what can be recycled and how — confuses consumers and produces low-quality material that often ends up in landfills anyway. Recycling infrastructure must be expanded, standardized, and modernized to handle the volume and variety of materials we actually produce.
Recycling systems must be expanded, standardized, and modernized to handle current material volumes and complexity.
Core rule in the ENV-REC family establishing: Recycling systems must be expanded, standardized, and modernized to handle current material volumes and complexity.
ENVR-RECS-0002
Included
Recycling infrastructure must be accessible, consistent, and effective
A recycling bin and a truck that collects it are only the beginning — the materials must actually be sorted and processed into usable raw material. Local recycling programs must be fully funded to do the complete job, not just collect materials that quietly end up in the landfill.
Recycling infrastructure must be accessible, consistent, and effective across regions, with clear standards and minimal consumer confusion.
Core rule in the ENV-REC family establishing: Recycling infrastructure must be accessible, consistent, and effective across regions, with clear standards and minimal consumer confusion.
ENVR-RECS-0003
Included
Materials placed into the market must be compatible
Recycling labels vary wildly across communities — the same symbol can mean recyclable here and not recyclable anywhere in the same metropolitan area. Standardized, accurate recycling labels help people sort correctly and prevent contamination of recycling streams.
Materials placed into the market must be compatible with existing or planned recycling systems or subject to restrictions.
Core rule in the ENV-REC family establishing: Materials placed into the market must be compatible with existing or planned recycling systems or subject to restrictions.
ENVR-TRAN-0001
Included
Governments must track and publish data on waste
How much waste is the U.S. actually generating? What percentage is being recycled, and what is leaking into the environment? Government must track and publish this data so policymakers and the public can know whether current policies are working and where attention is most needed.
Governments must track and publish data on waste generation, recycling rates, environmental leakage, and material flows.
Core rule in the ENV-TRN family establishing: Governments must track and publish data on waste generation, recycling rates, environmental leakage, and material flows.
ENVR-TRAN-0002
Included
High-risk materials and sectors must be subject
National averages can hide serious local problems — a neighborhood where recycling rates are zero or where pollution is leaking into a local creek. Environmental data must be collected at high enough resolution to detect local disparities and emerging issues before they become crises.
High-risk materials and sectors must be subject to enhanced monitoring and reporting requirements.
Core rule in the ENV-TRN family establishing: High-risk materials and sectors must be subject to enhanced monitoring and reporting requirements.
ENVR-WSTS-0001
Included
Waste generation must be minimized at the source
Reducing waste at the source — making less of it in the first place — is far more effective than managing it after it has been created. All waste policy must start with minimizing generation and preventing materials from escaping into the environment, not just finding better ways to dispose of them.
Waste generation must be minimized at the source, and materials must be managed to prevent environmental release, accumulation, and long-term ecological harm.
Core rule in the ENV-WST family establishing: Waste generation must be minimized at the source, and materials must be managed to prevent environmental release, accumulation, and long-term ecological harm.
ENVR-DESS-0001
Included
Products and packaging must be designed for recyclability
Products and packaging that cannot be recycled, reused, or safely broken down are a major source of waste and pollution. New products must be designed from the start so materials can be recovered and reused — not just used once and thrown away.
Products and packaging must be designed for recyclability, reuse, or safe degradation, minimizing mixed materials and non-recoverable components.
Core rule in the ENV-DES family establishing: Products and packaging must be designed for recyclability, reuse, or safe degradation, minimizing mixed materials and non-recoverable components.
ENVR-DESS-0002
Included
Use of composite, bonded, or mixed materials that
Products made from multiple materials bonded or glued together — foil laminated to plastic, metal fused to fabric — almost never get recycled. Using these mixed-material constructions must be phased out unless there is a strong functional reason with no viable alternative.
Use of composite, bonded, or mixed materials that prevent recycling must be limited or justified.
Core rule in the ENV-DES family establishing: Use of composite, bonded, or mixed materials that prevent recycling must be limited or justified.
ENVR-ENFL-0001
Included
Entities responsible for environmental contamination through waste leakage
When a company's waste tanks leak, pipelines rupture, or improper disposal contaminates groundwater, that company must pay to clean it up — not the public or the affected community. Strict liability means there is no escaping responsibility by arguing the contamination was accidental.
Entities responsible for environmental contamination through waste leakage or mismanagement must be held liable for cleanup, remediation, and damages.
Core rule in the ENV-ENF family establishing: Entities responsible for environmental contamination through waste leakage or mismanagement must be held liable for cleanup, remediation, and damages.
ENVR-ENFL-0002
Included
Repeated or large-scale violations of waste containment
Repeated or catastrophic violations of waste containment rules — not one-time accidents — must trigger mandatory cleanup orders and elevated criminal penalties. The law must treat systematic negligence as the deliberate choice to externalize costs onto communities that it is.
Repeated or large-scale violations of waste containment and environmental protection rules must trigger escalating penalties and operational restrictions.
Core rule in the ENV-ENF family establishing: Repeated or large-scale violations of waste containment and environmental protection rules must trigger escalating penalties and operational restrictions.
ENVR-AINL-0001
Included
AI used in infrastructure, energy, water, transport
When artificial intelligence (AI) is used to manage power grids, water systems, or transportation networks, safety and environmental protection must come first — not just efficiency or corporate profit. This policy requires AI systems in critical infrastructure to meet binding public-safety and environmental-protection obligations, regardless of who built them.
AI used in infrastructure, energy, water, transport, or environmental management must be constrained by public-safety, resilience, and environmental-protection obligations above efficiency or profit goals.
Core rule in the ENV-AI family establishing: AI used in infrastructure, energy, water, transport, or environmental management must be constrained by public-safety, resilience, and environmental-protection obligations above ef.
ENVR-LIFS-0001
Included
Manufacturers are responsible for the full lifecycle impact
The environmental impact of a product doesn't end when you buy it — it continues through every year of use and into how it's eventually discarded. Manufacturers are responsible for that full lifecycle, from product design through to end-of-life management.
Manufacturers are responsible for the full lifecycle impact of their products, including end-of-life disposal, recycling, and material recovery.
Core rule in the EWT-LIF family establishing: Manufacturers are responsible for the full lifecycle impact of their products, including end-of-life disposal, recycling, and material recovery.
ENVR-LIFS-0002
Included
Producers must provide accessible take-back, recycling, or refurbishment
Products designed to be thrown away after one use or one failure waste enormous amounts of materials and energy. Every product should be repairable, upgradeable, or recyclable so that useful materials stay in circulation as long as possible.
Producers must provide accessible take-back, recycling, or refurbishment programs for products at end of life.
Core rule in the EWT-LIF family establishing: Producers must provide accessible take-back, recycling, or refurbishment programs for products at end of life.
ENVR-LIFS-0003
Included
Products may not be designed in ways that
Manufacturers must provide ways to take back their products at end of life, support repair networks, and fund recycling programs. Making producers responsible for what happens after the sale is the most effective incentive to design products that don't end up in landfills.
Products may not be designed in ways that make recycling, disassembly, or material recovery impractical or economically unviable.
Core rule in the EWT-LIF family establishing: Products may not be designed in ways that make recycling, disassembly, or material recovery impractical or economically unviable.
ENVR-SUPR-0001
Included
Withdrawal of software support may not render hardware
Companies must not be allowed to permanently disable (brick) a working physical device simply by ending software support or shutting down online services. Hardware that is physically functional must remain functional regardless of the manufacturer's business decisions.
Withdrawal of software support may not render hardware unusable where continued basic functionality is technically feasible.
Core rule in the EWT-SUP family establishing: Withdrawal of software support may not render hardware unusable where continued basic functionality is technically feasible.
ENVR-SUPR-0002
Included
Devices must retain baseline usability after end-of-support unless
When a manufacturer ends support for a product's software, they must release that software as open source or provide a functional way to keep the product running. This prevents hardware built with real materials and energy from becoming landfill just because a company stopped issuing updates.
Devices must retain baseline usability after end-of-support unless a clear and demonstrable safety or security risk exists.
Core rule in the EWT-SUP family establishing: Devices must retain baseline usability after end-of-support unless a clear and demonstrable safety or security risk exists.
ENVR-REGS-0002
Included
Environmental Protection Agency must be constitutionally established, funded
Crop rotation, cover crops, and reduced tillage (less plowing) build healthier soil, reduce fertilizer runoff, and help the land absorb and store carbon. Farmers who adopt these practices must be incentivized and supported through federal conservation programs.
The Environmental Protection Agency must be constitutionally established, funded, and empowered to enforce environmental protections.
Core rule in the ENV-REG family establishing: The Environmental Protection Agency must be constitutionally established, funded, and empowered to enforce environmental protections.
ENVR-REGS-0003
Included
Baseline environmental protections must include limits on emissions
Heavy reliance on synthetic pesticides and fertilizers degrades soil, pollutes waterways, and creates health risks for farm workers and nearby communities. Federal programs must support and fund farmers who transition to organic and low-input methods that reduce these harms.
Baseline environmental protections must include limits on emissions, pollutants, resource use, and ecological harm, with a mandate for active enforcement.
Core rule in the ENV-REG family establishing: Baseline environmental protections must include limits on emissions, pollutants, resource use, and ecological harm, with a mandate for active enforcement.
ENVR-REGS-0004
Included
Carbon, water, and environmental offsets may not be
Precision agriculture technologies — GPS-guided planting, soil sensors, drone monitoring — can dramatically reduce fertilizer, pesticide, and water use while maintaining yields. Federal investment must support development and adoption of these tools, especially for smaller farms that can't afford them alone.
Carbon, water, and environmental offsets may not be used in place of direct reduction unless supported by clear, auditable, traceable, and publicly transparent evidence of equivalent impact.
Core rule in the ENV-REG family establishing: Carbon, water, and environmental offsets may not be used in place of direct reduction unless supported by clear, auditable, traceable, and publicly transparent evidence of equivale.
ENVR-SYSR-0002
Included
Products must be designed, manufactured, and supported
When waste-generating practices can dodge accountability by falling between agencies — not an EPA issue, not a consumer protection issue — those jurisdictional gaps must be closed by design, not left for communities to fight over case by case.
Products must be designed, manufactured, and supported to minimize waste, extend usable life, and reduce unnecessary disposal.
Core rule in the EWT-SYS family establishing: Products must be designed, manufactured, and supported to minimize waste, extend usable life, and reduce unnecessary disposal.
ENVR-SYSR-0003
Included
Anti-waste, repairability, and anti-lock-in requirements must be integrated
Federal waste policy must be built around a circular economy model — keeping materials in use as long as possible, minimizing what gets extracted from nature, and closing the loop so waste from one process becomes input for another. Linear “take-make-throw” systems waste finite resources and externalize harm onto communities and ecosystems.
Anti-waste, repairability, and anti-lock-in requirements must be integrated into environmental policy, consumer protection, and competition law.
Core rule in the EWT-SYS family establishing: Anti-waste, repairability, and anti-lock-in requirements must be integrated into environmental policy, consumer protection, and competition law.
ENVR-DESS-0003
Included
Products must be designed for long-term use, including
Appliances, electronics, and other products that break easily and cannot be repaired waste both money and resources. Products must be built to last, with parts that can be replaced when they wear out rather than requiring disposal of the whole device.
Products must be designed for long-term use, including durability, repairability, and upgradeability where feasible.
Core rule in the EWT-DES family establishing: Products must be designed for long-term use, including durability, repairability, and upgradeability where feasible.
ENVR-DESS-0004
Included
Use of non-replaceable components in high-failure areas, including
Sealed-in batteries, glued displays, and non-replaceable components in devices that fail most often force consumers to throw away otherwise functional products. Manufacturers must stop sealing in the parts most likely to fail first and instead design them to be user-replaceable.
Use of non-replaceable components in high-failure areas, including batteries, storage, or wear parts, is prohibited where replaceable alternatives are feasible.
Core rule in the EWT-DES family establishing: Use of non-replaceable components in high-failure areas, including batteries, storage, or wear parts, is prohibited where replaceable alternatives are feasible.
ENVR-TRAN-0003
Included
Products must disclose expected lifespan, support duration, repairability
Environmental data is only useful if people can actually access and work with it. Data on waste, recycling, pollution, and material flows must be published in formats that communities, researchers, and policymakers can use — not archived in inaccessible government databases.
Products must disclose expected lifespan, support duration, repairability, and recyclability in standardized formats.
Core rule in the EWT-TRN family establishing: Products must disclose expected lifespan, support duration, repairability, and recyclability in standardized formats.
ENVR-WSTS-0002
Included
Rapid product replacement cycles that drive unnecessary disposal
The right order of waste management — reduce first, then reuse, then recycle, then safely dispose — reflects a basic truth: the further down the chain you go, the more value and resources are already lost. All waste policy must follow this hierarchy.
Rapid product replacement cycles that drive unnecessary disposal without meaningful functional improvement must be regulated or discouraged.
Core rule in the EWT-WST family establishing: Rapid product replacement cycles that drive unnecessary disposal without meaningful functional improvement must be regulated or discouraged.
ENVR-WSTS-0003
Included
Marketing practices that encourage premature replacement of functional
When a new material's long-term environmental impact is unknown, the default must be caution — not wait-and-see. The precautionary principle, acting to prevent harm before it is proven rather than waiting for evidence of damage, must guide how novel materials are regulated.
Marketing practices that encourage premature replacement of functional products must be subject to consumer-protection standards.
Core rule in the EWT-WST family establishing: Marketing practices that encourage premature replacement of functional products must be subject to consumer-protection standards.
ENVR-REGS-0005ProposalBreak Up Agricultural Monopolies Through Structural Divestiture
Healthy soil is a long-term national resource, but it is rarely measured or tracked. Farms participating in USDA conservation programs must measure and report their soil health over time so that public money actually funds practices that improve the land.
Congress must enact legislation mandating structural divestiture of dominant firms in seed genetics, meat processing, and commodity grain trading where any single entity controls more than 25% of market share; the Department of Justice must bring suit to enforce within two years of enactment, with private right of action for farmers harmed by anticompetitive practices.
Agricultural consolidation has left four firms controlling 85% of U.S. beef processing and three firms controlling 65% of seed genetics. Exceeds DSA and Democratic Party platforms. No structural divestiture mandate exists under current USDA or DOJ consent decrees.
ENVR-REGS-0006ProposalRight to Repair for Agricultural Equipment
Fertilizer and pesticide runoff from farms is one of the leading causes of water pollution in the U.S., creating dead zones in the Gulf of Mexico and contaminating drinking water sources. Farms receiving federal subsidy payments must have — and follow — plans to manage their runoff.
Congress must enact a federal agricultural right-to-repair law requiring manufacturers to provide farmers and independent technicians with access to all diagnostic software, repair manuals, and replacement parts at fair prices; manufacturers who use software locks or voided-warranty clauses to block independent repair must be subject to civil penalties of up to $50,000 per violation, with a private right of action for affected farmers.
John Deere and other manufacturers use proprietary software to prevent farmers from repairing their own equipment, forcing costly dealer-only service. Exceeds WFP platform. No federal statutory right to repair for agricultural equipment exists.
ENVR-REGS-0007ProposalRegenerative Agriculture Incentives and Soil Carbon Sequestration Programs
Large-scale livestock operations often confine animals in conditions that cause severe, chronic suffering. Federal standards must establish minimum humane confinement conditions — covering space, movement, and basic behavioral needs — for animals raised in large-scale industrial operations.
USDA must establish and fully fund a Soil Health and Carbon Sequestration Program that pays farmers per verified ton of carbon sequestered using regenerative practices; payments must be additional to, not offset against, existing conservation program subsidies; program must prioritize small and mid-size farmers and historically underserved agricultural communities.
Regenerative practices — cover cropping, no-till, agroforestry — can sequester significant soil carbon while restoring soil health. Exceeds current USDA CRP program scope. No statutory payment floor for sequestration exists.
ENVR-BIOS-0003ProposalProtect wildlife habitats and national parks from exploitation degradation and commercial encroachment
Protect wildlife habitats and national parks from exploitation degradation and commercial encroachment
Source: DB entry ENV-BIO-003, status: MISSING. Pending editorial review.
ENVR-CLNS-0018ProposalStatutory Carbon Budget: Hard Declining Caps Aligned With 1.5°C Pathway
The U.S. must set and enforce hard, declining limits on total greenhouse gas emissions — a "carbon budget" — aligned with limiting global warming to 1.5°C (2.7°F), as scientists say is necessary to avoid the worst climate outcomes. Without enforceable caps, voluntary pledges will not deliver what the science requires.
Congress must enact a statutory national carbon budget establishing sector-by-sector declining emissions caps consistent with a 1.5°C warming pathway, with legally binding five-year compliance milestones; EPA must enforce compliance through permit revocation, civil penalties up to $500,000 per day per violation, and referral to DOJ for criminal prosecution; any regulated entity that fails to meet its cap must purchase and retire verified carbon offsets at a 3:1 ratio.
The U.S. has no statutory carbon budget. Executive orders are reversible; statutory caps are not. Far exceeds Democratic Party platform and matches the ambition required by IPCC AR6.
ENVR-CLNS-0019ProposalClean Electricity Standard: 100% Clean Grid by 2035
Every electric utility must generate 100% of its power from clean, zero-emission sources by 2035. Clean electricity — from wind, solar, hydropower, and other renewables — is the foundation of a decarbonized economy, and this mandate sets binding interim milestones backed by federal investment and enforcement.
Congress must enact a Clean Electricity Standard requiring retail electricity suppliers to source 100% of their power from clean, zero-carbon resources by December 31, 2035; utilities that miss annual compliance targets must pay a clean electricity payment of no less than $50 per MWh of non-compliant generation, with proceeds directed to the Federal Just Transition Fund; no nuclear plant may receive credits under the standard unless it has a binding and funded waste storage plan.
A 100% clean grid by 2035 is required to meet climate targets. Statutory standard is more durable than executive action. Exceeds the Democratic Party's 2035 clean electricity goal by requiring statutory enactment.
ENVR-CLNS-0020ProposalMandatory Methane Monitoring, Strict Leak Limits, and Criminal Penalties for Flaring Violations
Methane — the main component of natural gas — traps heat in the atmosphere far more powerfully than carbon dioxide over the short term. All oil and gas operations must monitor and sharply limit methane leaks, and deliberately burning off gas (flaring) in violation of regulations must carry criminal penalties.
EPA must promulgate regulations requiring continuous real-time methane monitoring at all oil and gas production, processing, and transmission facilities; leak rates exceeding 0.2% of throughput must trigger immediate mandatory repair; unauthorized flaring must be classified as a criminal violation with penalties of up to $250,000 per incident and personal liability for the responsible facility manager; any person may bring a citizen suit to enforce these requirements.
Methane is 80 times more potent than CO₂ over 20 years. Current EPA rules allow for delayed compliance and do not criminalize flaring. Exceeds all major party platforms on methane enforcement specificity.
ENVR-CORS-0003ProposalPFAS: Classify All PFAS as CERCLA Hazardous Substances, Strict Liability on Manufacturers
PFAS — a class of thousands of synthetic "forever chemicals" — must be classified as hazardous substances under the federal Superfund law (CERCLA), making manufacturers strictly liable for cleanup costs regardless of negligence. This removes major legal barriers to forcing polluters to pay.
Congress must amend CERCLA to classify all per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) as hazardous substances; manufacturers and users of PFAS must bear strict, joint, and several liability for all remediation costs without any liability cap; EPA must establish maximum contaminant levels for all detected PFAS in public water systems within two years; any person whose drinking water is contaminated above the MCL has a private right of action against liable parties.
Over 200 million Americans have PFAS-contaminated drinking water. No federal CERCLA classification of PFAS exists as of 2024. EPA has proposed but not enacted MCLs. Strict liability far exceeds current regulatory posture.
ENVR-CORS-0004ProposalFence-Line Community Monitoring: Mandatory Real-Time Air and Water Quality Data
People who live at the fence line of factories, refineries, and chemical plants are exposed to pollution that distant regulators may not even be tracking. Mandatory real-time, publicly accessible air and water quality monitoring at these locations gives communities the information they need to protect themselves.
All facilities emitting criteria pollutants above a de minimis threshold must install and operate continuous real-time air quality and water quality monitoring equipment at their facility boundaries; all monitoring data must be transmitted in real time to EPA's public data portal; any community member within a 5-mile radius has standing to bring a citizen suit based on monitoring data showing violations; EPA must act on violations within 90 days of detection or face mandatory penalties.
Fence-line communities — disproportionately Black, Indigenous, and low-income — suffer acute pollution exposure. No federal real-time fence-line monitoring mandate exists. Exceeds all major party platforms.
ENVR-DESS-0005ProposalBan New Fossil Fuel Extraction Permits on Federal Lands and Phase Out Existing Permits
Federal public land belongs to all Americans, not oil and mining companies. No new permits for fossil fuel extraction on public lands may be issued, and existing permits must be phased out on a responsible timeline that protects both the environment and affected workers.
Congress must enact a moratorium on all new oil, gas, and coal extraction permits on federal lands and waters effective upon enactment; existing permits on federal land must be subject to mandatory review for climate impact and community health, with phase-out schedules not to exceed 10 years; royalty revenues from existing extraction during phase-out must be redirected entirely to a Reclamation and Just Transition Fund; no offshore drilling permits may be issued in any new area.
Federal lands account for approximately 25% of U.S. oil and gas production and 40% of coal production. A statutory ban on new permits exceeds all major party platforms. No existing law prohibits issuance of new extraction permits on federal lands.
ENVR-ENFL-0003ProposalEPA Independence: Full Funding, No Political Interference in Enforcement Decisions
The EPA enforces the laws protecting our air, water, and land — but political pressure has repeatedly led to enforcement delays and weakened rules. The EPA must be fully funded and legally protected from political interference so enforcement decisions are made on science and law, not industry relationships.
Congress must provide EPA with a non-rescindable baseline appropriation indexed to inflation; no executive branch officer may direct, delay, or veto an EPA enforcement action after the agency's enforcement counsel has issued a referral; EPA's enforcement attorneys must be designated as career civil servants immune from political removal; the EPA Inspector General must report directly to Congress.
EPA enforcement has been systematically weakened through political interference and budget cuts. Statutory independence would insulate enforcement from executive pressure. No existing statute fully protects EPA enforcement decisions from political override.
ENVR-ENFL-0004ProposalEnvironmental Crimes: Upgrade to Felonies, Personal Liability for Executives
Knowingly dumping toxic waste or falsifying environmental records are often treated as minor civil violations with modest fines — not the serious crimes they are. Major environmental violations must be upgraded to felonies, and executives who authorize them must face personal criminal liability, not just corporate fines.
Congress must amend the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, RCRA, and CERCLA to classify knowing violations resulting in environmental harm as Class C felonies with mandatory minimum sentences of two years for responsible corporate officers; the "responsible corporate officer" doctrine must be codified to create personal liability for executives who knew or should have known of violations; whistleblowers who expose corporate environmental crimes must be protected and entitled to 30% of any resulting criminal penalty.
Environmental crimes under current law carry weak penalties that corporations routinely price in as a cost of doing business. Felony classification with mandatory minimums exceeds every current major party platform. No mandatory minimum sentences currently apply to knowing environmental violations.
ENVR-ENFL-0005ProposalNo Revolving Door: Five-Year Cooling-Off Period Between EPA and Regulated Industries
The "revolving door" — where EPA officials leave to lobby for the industries they once regulated, or industry executives move into regulatory roles — undermines enforcement and public trust. A five-year waiting period before regulators can work for regulated industries, and vice versa, reduces conflicts of interest.
No person who has served as a senior EPA official (GS-15 or above, or any political appointee) may accept employment with, consult for, or lobby on behalf of any entity regulated by EPA for a period of five years after leaving federal service; no person who has been employed by or consulted for a regulated industry may serve in an EPA enforcement or permitting role involving that industry for five years after such private employment; violations must be prosecuted as federal ethics crimes.
Regulatory capture through the revolving door systematically undermines EPA independence. Current cooling-off period is one year. Five years exceeds all current statutory requirements and all major party platform proposals.
ENVR-ENFL-0006ProposalRestore and Expand Citizen Suit Provisions Across All Environmental Laws
Environmental laws often allow ordinary citizens to sue polluters directly when the government fails to act — a critical backup enforcement tool. Those citizen suit provisions must be restored and expanded across all major environmental laws so communities can hold polluters accountable even when agencies don't.
Congress must enact a unified Environmental Citizen Suit Act restoring and expanding citizen enforcement rights across the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, RCRA, CERCLA, TSCA, and all other federal environmental statutes; any person may bring suit against any entity — including federal agencies — for violations without requiring proof of individual injury beyond geographic proximity; courts must award attorney fees to prevailing plaintiffs and may impose supplemental environmental projects in lieu of a portion of civil penalties.
Citizens' ability to enforce environmental laws has been narrowed by Supreme Court standing doctrine and statutory limitations. A unified citizen suit act exceeds all major party platforms. No unified federal environmental citizen suit statute exists.
ENVR-EPRS-0004ProposalNational EPR Mandate: All Plastic Packaging Must Be Recovered, Recycled, or Compostable
All plastic packaging sold in the U.S. must either be actually recycled, recovered, or composted — not just labeled recyclable without any system to do so. Extended producer responsibility (EPR) — requiring manufacturers to fund and operate take-back and recycling programs — is how that happens.
Congress must enact a National Packaging Extended Producer Responsibility Act requiring all plastic packaging placed on the U.S. market to be either collected and recycled at a rate of no less than 90%, certified industrially compostable, or subject to a per-unit eco-modulated fee that funds public collection and processing infrastructure; fees must be paid by the producer of the packaging material, not the retailer or consumer; EPA must set and enforce annual recovery rate benchmarks with civil penalties of $100,000 per day for non-compliance.
Only 9% of plastic ever produced has been recycled. No federal EPR mandate for packaging exists. National 90% recovery rate exceeds EU EPR targets and all major party platforms.
ENVR-INDS-0003ProposalBan Organophosphate and Neonicotinoid Pesticides Linked to Pollinator Collapse
Facilities that generate industrial waste must monitor what they are releasing and report it publicly. Routine monitoring and transparent reporting allow regulators, researchers, and nearby communities to identify problems before they become crises.
EPA must cancel all registrations for organophosphate pesticides that EPA's own science demonstrates are acutely toxic to pollinators and must cancel registrations for all neonicotinoid pesticides within five years, unless an applicant demonstrates by clear and convincing evidence that a specific use poses no unreasonable risk to pollinators or beneficial insects; USDA must fund transition payments for affected farmers and accelerate approval of biological pest control alternatives; any person may bring a citizen suit to challenge EPA's failure to act.
Neonicotinoids have been linked to colony collapse disorder and are banned in the EU. No federal ban on neonicotinoids exists. EPA's FIFRA review process has been systematically delayed. Mandatory cancellation timelines exceed all major party platforms.
ENVR-INDS-0004ProposalIndustrial Animal Agriculture: Mandatory Pollution Controls on CAFOs, No Agricultural Exemptions
When an industrial facility sits next to homes, a school, or a drinking water source, the margin for error is much smaller than at a remote industrial site. Facilities near sensitive communities must meet stricter environmental standards that reflect what is at stake.
EPA must eliminate the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act agricultural exemptions for Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) with more than 500 animal units; all large CAFOs must obtain Clean Air Act permits, install continuous air emissions monitoring, and meet nutrient management standards that protect groundwater; ammonia and hydrogen sulfide emissions must be subject to NAAQS standards by 2028; any neighboring resident may bring a nuisance and civil rights action against CAFOs that violate permit terms.
CAFOs are exempt from key Clean Air Act requirements that apply to all other industrial facilities. Eliminating agricultural exemptions and applying NAAQS to CAFO emissions exceeds all major party platforms and current EPA policy.
ENVR-PKSS-0001ProposalFederal and state governments must protect wildlife habitats and national parks from privatization, extraction, and d...
National parks, wilderness areas, and wildlife habitats are shared public assets that must be protected from being sold off, drilled, mined, or logged. Strong enforcement funding and legal mandates to restore damaged areas ensure that protection is real, not just a promise on paper.
Federal and state governments must protect wildlife habitats and national parks from privatization, extraction, and degradation
Source: DB entry ENV-PKS-001, status: MISSING. Pending editorial review.
ENVR-PLSS-0004ProposalBan Single-Use Plastics: Statutory Federal Prohibition With Extended Producer Responsibility
Microbeads — tiny plastic particles used as exfoliants in cosmetics and as abrasives in cleaning products — wash directly into waterways and are too small to filter out in wastewater treatment. Intentionally added microplastics in consumer products must be completely banned.
Congress must enact a federal prohibition on the manufacture, import, and sale of single-use plastic items — including bags, straws, cutlery, cups, and polystyrene foam packaging — within three years of enactment; all plastic packaging not banned outright must meet compostability or refillability standards; manufacturers and importers of plastic packaging must fund and operate a national take-back and recycling infrastructure through a mandatory extended producer responsibility fee.
The U.S. generates the most plastic waste per capita of any nation. No federal ban on single-use plastics exists. EPR funding mechanism exceeds all major party platforms. Exceeds the EU Single-Use Plastics Directive in scope.
ENVR-PLSS-0005ProposalMandatory Microplastics Monitoring and Phased Elimination From Consumer Products
The federal government must lead by example: all federal agencies and facilities must stop purchasing single-use plastics by 2028. Removing single-use plastics from federal procurement removes billions of dollars in demand for disposable plastic and sends a clear market signal.
EPA must establish binding maximum contaminant levels for microplastics in drinking water within two years; FDA must ban intentionally added microplastics and nanoplastics in all cosmetics, personal care products, and food contact materials within three years; any manufacturer that knowingly releases microplastics above permitted levels must be subject to strict liability without cap; any person may bring a citizen suit against manufacturers whose products shed microplastics above established thresholds.
Microplastics have been detected in human blood, lungs, and breast milk. No federal MCL for microplastics in drinking water exists. No federal ban on intentionally added microplastics applies to cosmetics. Exceeds all major party platforms.
ENVR-POLC-0003ProposalStatutory Right to a Clean Environment as a Federal Civil Right
Wireless networks are expanding rapidly, and exposure to electromagnetic radiation from towers and infrastructure is a growing concern for communities where infrastructure is concentrated. The federal government must set and enforce standards for monitoring electromagnetic exposure and protecting public safety as networks proliferate.
Congress must enact the Environmental Justice Civil Rights Act establishing a statutory federal civil right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment; any person subjected to disproportionate pollution burden on the basis of race, income, or ZIP code may bring a civil rights action for injunctive relief, compensatory damages, and attorney fees against any state or private actor; EPA must promulgate environmental justice regulations enforceable through Title VI and the new statute within 18 months of enactment.
The U.S. has no statutory federal right to a clean environment. Environmental justice communities bear disproportionate pollution burdens. Statutory civil rights framework with private right of action exceeds DSA, WFP, and Democratic Party platforms.
ENVR-POLC-0004ProposalMandatory Cumulative Impact Assessments Before Permitting in Overburdened Communities
Microplastics and PFAS ("forever chemicals") have spread throughout the environment and are now detected in human blood, rainwater, and the most remote ecosystems. National pollution standards must specifically address monitoring and reducing these chemical pollutants alongside conventional air and water pollution.
EPA must require cumulative impact assessments as a condition of any new or renewed permit for a facility in any community already at or above the 80th national percentile on any EPA EJScreen indicator; if a proposed facility would push any indicator above the 90th percentile, the permit must be denied unless the applicant demonstrates net community health benefit; communities have the right to participate in all hearings with translation services provided, and may appeal any permit decision in federal district court.
No federal law currently requires cumulative impact analysis before permitting polluting facilities near overburdened communities. Mandatory denial threshold exceeds all major party platforms. EPA EJScreen exists but currently has no binding permitting authority.
ENVR-POLC-0005ProposalCERCLA/Superfund Reform: Fund the Trust Fund, Eliminate Liability Caps, Mandate Cleanup Timelines
Current EPA air quality standards for fine particulate matter (PM2.5 — tiny particles that penetrate deep into lungs), ozone, and other pollutants may not fully protect public health based on the latest science. National standards must be updated and expanded to address emerging industrial pollutants that current rules do not yet cover.
Congress must restore and expand the Superfund excise tax on chemical and petroleum industries at an inflation-adjusted rate sufficient to fully fund the Superfund Trust Fund; all liability caps for responsible parties must be eliminated; EPA must issue binding cleanup orders with mandatory completion timelines not to exceed 10 years from listing; communities adjacent to Superfund sites must receive health monitoring, medical screening, and property value compensation; any resident within one mile of a listed site has a private right of action against responsible parties.
Over 1,300 Superfund sites remain contaminated decades after listing. The Superfund excise tax expired in 1995 and was only partially restored in 2021. No mandatory cleanup timelines exist under current CERCLA. Eliminating caps and mandating timelines exceeds all major party platforms.
ENVR-SYSR-0004Proposal30x30: Statutory Mandate to Protect 30% of U.S. Land and Ocean by 2030
Waste rules must cover a product's full journey — how it is extracted, manufactured, used, and eventually discarded — not just what happens at the final disposal stage. Problems designed into a product at the beginning cannot be fixed by better trash management at the end.
Congress must enact the America the Beautiful Act establishing a legally binding commitment to protect 30% of U.S. lands and 30% of U.S. ocean areas by 2030; protected areas must include a diversity of ecosystems, with Indigenous-led and community-based conservation fully credited; no protected area may be delisted without an Act of Congress; extractive industries must be prohibited in newly protected areas, and existing extraction permits must be bought out using Land and Water Conservation Fund appropriations.
The Biden 30x30 executive order is reversible by any subsequent administration. Statutory codification ensures permanence. The U.S. currently protects approximately 12% of its land. Exceeds all major party platforms in statutory durability.
ENVR-SYSR-0005ProposalStrengthen the Endangered Species Act: Weakening Listings Is a Criminal Offense
Waste issues routinely cut across the responsibilities of multiple agencies — EPA, FDA, FTC, CPSC, USDA. Those agencies must coordinate rather than each treating waste as someone else's problem. Cross-agency coordination is required, not optional.
Congress must amend the ESA to require that all listing decisions be made solely on scientific criteria with no economic balancing; any elected or appointed official who intervenes in a listing or delisting decision for non-scientific reasons must be subject to criminal prosecution; critical habitat designations must be automatic upon listing and may not be excluded for economic reasons; Congress must appropriate no less than $2 billion annually for ESA implementation, recovery plans, and habitat acquisition.
The ESA has been systematically weakened through regulatory rollbacks and political interference in listing decisions. Criminalizing interference with science-based listings is without precedent in any major party platform. Exceeds all existing statutory protections.
ENVR-SYSR-0006ProposalGreen New Deal Just Transition: Federal Job Guarantee in Clean Energy for Fossil Fuel Workers
The science of materials, environmental impact, and waste management evolves rapidly — regulatory standards must be updated regularly to keep pace with that science, not left static for decades while the problems around them change.
Congress must establish a Federal Just Transition Authority providing guaranteed employment at prevailing wage in clean energy, land restoration, and environmental remediation for any worker displaced from the fossil fuel industry; the Authority must provide full wage replacement for two years, free retraining, relocation assistance, and pension bridging for workers within ten years of retirement age; funding must come from a dedicated surcharge on fossil fuel company profits exceeding $1 billion annually.
Fossil fuel workers face displacement without adequate federal safety net as the energy transition accelerates. A guaranteed federal employment program for displaced fossil fuel workers exceeds the DSA, WFP, and Democratic Party platforms in specificity and obligation. No existing federal program provides guaranteed employment placement.
ENVR-TRAN-0004ProposalMandatory Real-Time Public Environmental Monitoring Dashboard
When every industry and every state uses different definitions and formats for environmental reporting, comparisons are impossible and patterns are invisible. Standardized reporting requirements across industries and jurisdictions make accountability possible.
EPA must operate and publicly fund a national real-time environmental monitoring dashboard aggregating air quality, water quality, toxic emissions, and permit compliance data for every regulated facility in the United States; all data must be publicly accessible via open API without fee; communities may flag anomalies triggering mandatory EPA response within 48 hours; failure to maintain dashboard data within two hours of receipt must be subject to civil penalties.
The public currently has no real-time, integrated access to environmental monitoring data. A statutory real-time dashboard with response triggers exceeds all major party platforms. No existing law requires integrated, real-time public monitoring publication.
ENVR-TRAN-0005ProposalMandatory Annual Corporate Environmental Impact Disclosure
Transparency in environmental reporting is about more than publishing numbers — it is about whether communities, regulators, and advocates can actually use that data to hold polluters accountable. Open, accessible reporting builds the public trust and enforcement capacity that environmental protection requires.
All publicly traded companies and all private companies with annual revenue over $100 million must publish audited annual environmental impact reports including Scope 1, 2, and 3 greenhouse gas emissions, water withdrawal and discharge volumes, toxic releases, biodiversity impacts, and supply chain environmental audits; reports must be filed with SEC and EPA using standardized machine-readable formats; material misstatements in environmental disclosures must be subject to the same penalties as securities fraud.
Corporate greenwashing is rampant and unpenalized. SEC's 2024 climate disclosure rule was limited in scope. Extending disclosure to Scope 3 and biodiversity, and attaching securities-fraud penalties, exceeds all existing regulatory requirements.
ENVR-URBS-0001ProposalCities and municipalities must provide and maintain publicly accessible green spaces proportional to population density
Parks, community gardens, tree canopy, and other green spaces reduce heat, improve air quality, support mental health, and give people outdoor places to gather. Cities must plan and maintain publicly accessible green space proportional to the number of people who live there — not just where property values make it convenient.
Cities and municipalities must provide and maintain publicly accessible green spaces proportional to population density
Source: DB entry ENV-URB-001, status: MISSING. Pending editorial review.
ENVR-WSTS-0004ProposalStatutory Zero Waste Targets With Enforceable Milestones and Polluter Liability
New categories of materials — nanomaterials (particles measured in billionths of a meter), synthetic biology products, advanced composites — are entering the waste stream faster than current regulations can address them. Waste policy must be regularly updated to govern these emerging categories before they cause irreversible harm.
Congress must enact national zero-waste targets requiring 50% reduction in municipal solid waste sent to landfill or incineration by 2030 and 90% reduction by 2040; EPA must issue binding sector-specific waste reduction rules for packaging, electronics, construction materials, and food waste; manufacturers whose products account for more than 1% of landfill waste by volume must contribute to a national Waste Reduction Trust Fund proportional to their share; any person may bring a citizen suit to enforce compliance milestones.
The U.S. has no national waste reduction statute with binding targets. Statutory milestones with polluter-pays funding mechanism exceed all major party platforms and current EPA voluntary programs.
ENVR-CPXS-0001
Proposed
Establish a carbon price that reflects the full social cost of greenhouse gas emissions
Making companies pay for the greenhouse gas pollution they emit — through a carbon fee or a cap-and-trade system — is one of the most effective tools for driving the clean energy transition. This policy requires major emitters to put a real price on their pollution so that clean alternatives become economically competitive.
The United States must implement a carbon pricing mechanism — whether a direct carbon fee, a cap-and-trade system, or equivalent — that requires all significant sources of greenhouse gas emissions to internalize the social cost of their emissions; the price must be set at a level reflecting peer-reviewed estimates of the social cost of carbon, escalate annually on a predictable schedule, and apply equitably across sectors without carve-outs for politically favored industries.
Carbon pricing is the most economically efficient mechanism for reducing greenhouse gas emissions because it works through market signals rather than regulatory mandates, creates incentives for innovation, and generates revenue that can be used to address transition costs. The social cost of carbon — the economic damage caused by each additional ton of emissions — provides the principled basis for pricing.
ENVR-CPXS-0002
Proposed
Return carbon pricing revenue as a per-capita dividend to protect working households
A carbon price could raise costs for working families if the revenue simply disappears into general government funds. This policy returns all carbon revenue as a direct, equal per-person dividend to every American, so low- and middle-income households come out ahead.
Revenue from carbon pricing must be returned to households as a per-capita dividend or equivalent direct benefit, ensuring that lower- and middle-income households — who consume less carbon-intensive goods — come out ahead financially; carbon pricing revenue may not be diverted to general government funds without explicit authorization and must not function as a regressive tax on working families who have the fewest options to reduce carbon-intensive consumption.
The political failure of carbon pricing in the U.S. has often been driven by legitimate concerns that it is regressive — falling hardest on lower-income households that spend more of their income on energy and transportation. A fee-and-dividend structure addresses this directly by ensuring the revenue returns to the people most affected.
ENVR-CPXS-0003
Proposed
Eliminate fossil fuel subsidies and redirect them to clean energy transition
The federal government currently provides over $20 billion a year in tax breaks and other subsidies to oil, gas, and coal companies — money that should be driving the clean energy transition instead. All fossil fuel subsidies must end, and the savings redirected to clean energy development and worker transition support.
All federal direct subsidies, tax preferences, and regulatory advantages for fossil fuel extraction, refining, and combustion must be eliminated on a defined schedule; subsidy savings must be redirected to clean energy transition support, worker retraining, and community development in fossil-fuel-dependent regions; no new fossil fuel subsidies may be created.
Federal fossil fuel subsidies represent a direct market distortion that makes carbon-intensive energy artificially cheap, undermining clean energy competitiveness and locking in emissions trajectories. Eliminating these subsidies is both economically rational and environmentally essential.
ENVR-JUSS-0001
Proposed
Prohibit siting of polluting facilities that creates disproportionate burden on communities of color and low-income communities
When a company applies to build an industrial facility, regulators must consider the total pollution burden that community already carries — not just what one new facility would add in isolation. In communities already overloaded with pollution, no new permits may be issued.
Environmental permitting processes must include a cumulative environmental burden analysis for proposed facilities; new permits for industrial polluters, hazardous waste facilities, and other significant emission sources may not be granted when they would create or compound disproportionate pollution burdens on communities of color or low-income communities; existing facilities creating disproportionate burdens must be subject to enhanced monitoring, stricter operating conditions, and prioritized cleanup requirements.
Decades of siting decisions have concentrated industrial pollution, hazardous waste, and environmental hazards in low-income communities and communities of color. This is not accidental — it reflects lower political power and land costs in these communities. Environmental justice requires addressing both legacy pollution and preventing new siting that continues these patterns.
ENVR-JUSS-0002
Proposed
Mandate community engagement and consent for major environmental decisions affecting frontline communities
Federal environmental enforcement must track whether its protections are applied equally — regardless of income or race — and actively correct cases where enforcement has consistently failed certain communities. Unequal pollution enforcement is both an environmental and a civil rights failure.
Communities with existing disproportionate environmental burdens must have meaningful participation rights — not merely notice and comment — in permitting, enforcement, and remediation decisions affecting their environments; environmental impact assessments for major projects must include community-led health impact assessments, translate all materials into the languages of affected communities, and must demonstrate genuine engagement rather than pro forma procedural compliance.
Environmental justice is not just about outcomes — it is about the process by which environmental decisions are made. Communities most affected by pollution have historically had the least power to shape the decisions that harm them. Procedural justice requires affirmative steps to ensure their voices are heard and given weight.
ENVR-JUSS-0003
Proposed
Prioritize Superfund cleanup and environmental remediation in historically overburdened communities
The communities most exposed to pollution historically have the least resources to address its consequences. Federal investment must flow to these communities for cleanup, health monitoring, medical care, and economic development — not just new rules about future projects.
Federal environmental cleanup priorities must use cumulative burden data to prioritize remediation in communities with the highest combined pollution exposure; the EPA must maintain a publicly accessible, regularly updated cumulative impact mapping tool; funding for Superfund and brownfield remediation must be adequate to address the documented backlog of contaminated sites affecting frontline communities.
The U.S. has thousands of contaminated Superfund sites, brownfields, and legacy pollution hotspots. These are concentrated in communities of color and low-income areas where cleanup has been deprioritized for decades. Remediation is not charity — it is correction of harm caused by policy failures and regulatory neglect.
ENVR-WTRS-0001
Proposed
Establish a federal right to clean water for all residents regardless of geography
Safe drinking water is a fundamental right, not a luxury — but millions of Americans, especially in low-income communities and communities of color, live with contaminated or unaffordable water. Federal law must set enforceable minimum water quality standards, prioritize cleanup of contaminated systems, and ensure no household loses access to safe water because they cannot pay.
Access to safe, affordable drinking water is a fundamental right; federal law must establish enforceable minimum standards for water quality and access, require state and federal agencies to prioritize remediation of contaminated water systems serving low-income communities and communities of color, and prohibit water shutoffs that deprive households of safe drinking water without adequate support for those who cannot afford payment.
Clean water access failures — from Flint, Michigan to tribal communities to rural agricultural areas contaminated by nitrates and pesticides — reveal that water access in the U.S. is not secure and is deeply unequal. An enforceable right to clean water is the necessary legal foundation for addressing these failures systematically rather than crisis by crisis.
ENVR-WTRS-0002
Proposed
Regulate agricultural and industrial water use to protect watersheds and downstream communities
Water scarcity and contamination affect entire regions — from aquifers depleted by farming to rivers poisoned by industry to recharge zones paved over by development. Federal and state water law must address all of these threats, update interstate water-sharing agreements for a drier climate, and guarantee downstream communities always have adequate water access.
Federal and state water law must address the full scope of water depletion and contamination threats to shared watersheds, including agricultural over-extraction from aquifers, industrial contamination of surface water, and development that paves over recharge zones; interstate water compacts must be updated to reflect climate-driven changes in water availability; water rights may not be allocated or transferred in ways that deprive downstream communities of adequate water access.
U.S. water law is a fragmented patchwork of state doctrines (prior appropriation in the West, riparian rights in the East) and federal regulations that systematically fails to protect shared water resources from overextraction and contamination. Climate change is accelerating water stress in regions that have relied on snowpack and aquifers that are now declining.
ENVR-WTRS-0003
Proposed
Require lead pipe replacement and achieve zero lead exposure in drinking water
PFAS ("forever chemicals"), nitrates from fertilizer runoff, lead from old pipes, and arsenic from natural deposits are among the most dangerous drinking water contaminants — but federal limits on several of them lag far behind the science. All drinking water contaminant limits must be based on the best available health science and updated regularly as knowledge improves.
All lead service lines in U.S. water systems must be replaced on a defined federal schedule with priority given to systems serving low-income communities and communities of color; no acceptable level of lead exposure from drinking water exists; federal funding must be sufficient to cover replacement costs without passing them to low-income water customers; interim protective measures must be in place until replacement is complete.
An estimated 9–12 million lead service lines still deliver drinking water in the United States.[11] Lead exposure at any level causes irreversible neurological harm in children; there is no safe threshold. The Flint water crisis demonstrated that lead contamination is not confined to older cities — it is widespread and requires systematic federal action rather than local remediation on a crisis-driven basis.
ENVR-CLIS-0001
Proposed
Require federal climate adaptation plans for all major infrastructure and service systems
The agencies that build our roads, power the grid, and supply our water need plans that account for hotter summers, rising seas, and more severe storms. Every major federal infrastructure agency must maintain a current climate adaptation plan and use it to guide where and how federal dollars are invested.
All major federal infrastructure programs and agencies responsible for transportation, energy, water, public health, and housing must develop and maintain current climate adaptation plans that assess climate risk projections for the full expected lifespan of infrastructure investments and incorporate adaptation requirements into design standards, siting decisions, and maintenance protocols; climate vulnerability assessments must be required for all major federal grants and loans.
Infrastructure built today will operate for 30–100 years under climate conditions dramatically different from present. Building to yesterday's standards in areas facing increased flooding, extreme heat, wildfire, or sea-level rise creates future stranded assets and preventable disaster losses. Adaptation planning is not an environmental nicety — it is fiscally responsible stewardship of public infrastructure investment.
ENVR-CLIS-0002
Proposed
Establish a managed retreat and relocation assistance program for climate-vulnerable communities
Some communities face unavoidable climate risks — from chronic flooding to sea level rise — where staying put is no longer safe. A federal program must fund planned, voluntary relocation for these communities, covering costs and helping residents transition to safer locations with dignity.
Federal policy must include a voluntary managed retreat program providing fair compensation and relocation support for households and communities in areas facing unavoidable climate threats — persistent flooding, coastal erosion, wildfire risk, heat extremes — including explicit protections to ensure that managed retreat does not reproduce patterns of racial and economic displacement; no community may be abandoned without adequate replacement support.
Some communities face climate impacts that cannot be adapted to in place at any reasonable cost — recurring flooding, erosion, and extreme heat that will make habitation increasingly dangerous or unlivable. Managed retreat is the responsible response but historically has displaced low-income communities and communities of color without fair compensation or replacement support. Federal policy must address this justly.
ENVR-FDSS-0001
This position establishes policy standards for the food system under the Environment and Agriculture pillar. Full policy language for this position is pending finalization.
AGR-FDS-001
AGR-FDS-001
ENVR-FDSS-0002
This position establishes additional food system standards under the Environment and Agriculture pillar. Full policy language for this position is pending finalization.
AGR-FDS-002
AGR-FDS-002
ENVR-LBLS-0001
This position requires food labels to clearly state where meat, fish, and produce come from, requires plain-language disclosure when food contains GMO ingredients, and prohibits products from using the word 'natural' on their label unless they are certified to meet that standard. Consumers have the right to know what is in their food and where it was grown or raised — current labeling gaps keep that information hidden.
Restore mandatory country-of-origin labeling for all meat, fish, and produce; require plain-language front-of-package GM
Restore mandatory country-of-origin labeling for all meat, fish, and produce; require plain-language front-of-package GMO disclosure; prohibit uncertified "natural" claims
ENVR-NUCS-0001
This position establishes nuclear energy and waste policy standards under the Environment and Agriculture pillar. Full policy language for this position is pending finalization.
ENV-NUC-001
ENV-NUC-001
ENVR-NUCS-0002
This position establishes additional nuclear energy or waste standards under the Environment and Agriculture pillar. Full policy language for this position is pending finalization.
ENV-NUC-002
ENV-NUC-002
ENVR-ORGS-0001
This position creates a federal program that supports farmers converting their land to organic production by providing five years of income payments, technical assistance, and coverage of certification fees during the difficult transition period. The income gap that farmers face while transitioning to organic — before their land qualifies for premium prices — is a major barrier that this program removes.
Establish a federal organic transition income support program providing five years of payments, technical assistance, an
Establish a federal organic transition income support program providing five years of payments, technical assistance, and certification fee coverage for farms converting to organic production
ENVR-ORGS-0002
This position requires that federal commodity support and crop insurance programs be restructured to eliminate the financial advantage that conventional industrial farming currently has over organic and diversified farming. Federal subsidies currently tilt the playing field heavily toward monoculture; rebalancing them gives farmers a real choice to adopt more sustainable practices.
Restructure federal commodity support and crop insurance programs to eliminate the subsidy advantage of conventional mon
Restructure federal commodity support and crop insurance programs to eliminate the subsidy advantage of conventional monoculture over organic and diversified farming systems
ENVR-PFAS-0001
This position establishes PFAS chemical regulation standards under the Environment and Agriculture pillar. Full policy language for this position is pending finalization.
ENV-PFAS-001
ENV-PFAS-001
ENVR-PFAS-0002
This position establishes additional PFAS chemical regulation standards under the Environment and Agriculture pillar. Full policy language for this position is pending finalization.
ENV-PFAS-002
ENV-PFAS-002
ENVR-PFAS-0003
This position requires the EPA to set binding drinking water limits for all PFAS compounds at the lowest detectable level, and requires Congress to ban all non-essential uses of PFAS in consumer products within five years. PFAS — known as 'forever chemicals' — accumulate in human bodies and have been linked to cancer, thyroid disease, and immune system damage.
The EPA Must Establish Binding Drinking Water Standards for All PFAS Compounds — Setting Maximum Contaminant Levels at t
The EPA Must Establish Binding Drinking Water Standards for All PFAS Compounds — Setting Maximum Contaminant Levels at the Lowest Detectable Level — and Congress Must Ban All Non-Essential Uses of PFAS in Consumer Products Within 5 Years
ENVR-PFAS-0004
This position holds PFAS manufacturers fully and directly liable for all remediation costs and victims' medical expenses when they knowingly concealed the health risks of their products — with no 'sophisticated purchaser' defense allowed for consumer-facing products. Companies that hid what they knew about PFAS toxicity for decades must pay to clean up the contamination they caused and provide healthcare to those they harmed.
PFAS Manufacturers Who Knowingly Concealed Health Risks Must Bear Full Liability for Remediation Costs and Victims' Medi
PFAS Manufacturers Who Knowingly Concealed Health Risks Must Bear Full Liability for Remediation Costs and Victims' Medical Expenses — With No "Sophisticated Purchaser" Defense Available for Consumer-Facing Products
ENVR-PFAS-0005
This position requires the Department of Defense to complete full PFAS remediation at all contaminated military bases within 10 years, provide free lifetime healthcare to all veterans and family members with PFAS exposure, and compensate affected communities for contaminated water and property. Military firefighting foam is a major source of PFAS contamination near bases, and those who served their country should not bear the health costs of that pollution.
The Department of Defense Must Complete PFAS Remediation at All Contaminated Military Bases Within 10 Years, Provide Fre
The Department of Defense Must Complete PFAS Remediation at All Contaminated Military Bases Within 10 Years, Provide Free Lifetime Healthcare to All Veterans and Family Members With PFAS Exposure, and Compensate Affected Communities
ENVR-RTFS-0001
This position prohibits the federal government from overriding state and local laws that set stricter environmental, food safety, pesticide, or animal welfare standards than federal minimums in agriculture and food production. Federal law is a floor, not a ceiling — states and localities that want stronger protections for their residents and environment should not be blocked from providing them.
Prohibit federal preemption of state and local laws that set stricter environmental, food safety, pesticide, or animal w
Prohibit federal preemption of state and local laws that set stricter environmental, food safety, pesticide, or animal welfare standards than federal minimums in agricultural and food production
ENVR-SUBS-0001
This position establishes agricultural subsidy reform standards under the Environment and Agriculture pillar. Full policy language for this position is pending finalization.
AGR-SUB-001
AGR-SUB-001
ENVR-SUBS-0002
This position establishes additional agricultural subsidy reform standards under the Environment and Agriculture pillar. Full policy language for this position is pending finalization.
AGR-SUB-002
AGR-SUB-002
ENVR-TRNS-0001
This position guarantees that every worker in coal mining, oil and gas extraction, petroleum refining, or coal power whose job is eliminated by the clean energy transition receives five years of full wage replacement, lifetime healthcare, and full pension vesting — regardless of how close to retirement they are. These workers kept America's energy system running; they deserve real economic security, not just retraining brochures.
Every Worker Employed in Coal Mining, Oil and Gas Extraction, Petroleum Refining, or Coal-Fired Power Generation Whose J
Every Worker Employed in Coal Mining, Oil and Gas Extraction, Petroleum Refining, or Coal-Fired Power Generation Whose Job Is Eliminated Due to Clean Energy Transition Must Receive 5 Years of Full Wage Replacement, Lifetime Healthcare, and Full Pension Vesting
ENVR-TRNS-0002
This position requires clean energy developers receiving federal incentives to prioritize hiring from fossil fuel communities and contribute to community reinvestment funds. It also requires fossil fuel companies to fully remediate all abandoned wells, mines, and contaminated sites before they can receive any new permits — making them clean up their past before profiting from the future.
Clean Energy Developers Receiving Federal Incentives Must Prioritize Hiring From Fossil Fuel Communities and Contribute
Clean Energy Developers Receiving Federal Incentives Must Prioritize Hiring From Fossil Fuel Communities and Contribute to Community Reinvestment Funds — And Fossil Fuel Companies Must Fund Remediation of All Abandoned Wells, Mines, and Contaminated Sites Before Receiving Any New Permits
The following rules address gaps identified in this pillar's adversarial audit and are under review for inclusion in the next policy cycle.
ENV-PFAS-001
ENV-PFAS-002
ENV-PFAS-003
Proposal
The EPA Must Establish Binding Drinking Water Standards for All PFAS Compounds — Setting Maximum Contaminant Levels at the Lowest Detectable Level — and Congress Must Ban All Non-Essential Uses of PFAS in Consumer Products Within 5 Years
Congress must: (1) require the EPA to finalize binding maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for PFAS compounds in all public drinking water systems within 1 year — setting enforceable limits at the lowest technically feasible level, with interim limits of 4 parts per trillion for PFOA and PFOS and 10 ppt for any PFAS compound pending final rule; (2) ban the manufacture, import, sale, or distribution of PFAS in the following product categories within 5 years: (a) food packaging and cookware; (b) cosmetics and personal care products; (c) children's clothing and school supplies; (d) carpets and upholstery; (e) firefighting foam for non-aviation uses — with an exemption process available only for applications with no technically feasible substitute; (3) establish a National PFAS Superfund — funded by a $10 billion fee on PFAS manufacturers and importers — to remediate contaminated water systems, soil, and military base communities; (4) require the EPA to add all PFAS compounds to the Toxic Release Inventory — requiring any facility releasing PFAS above threshold quantities to publicly report annually; (5) establish criminal liability — fines up to $50 million per year of violation and imprisonment up to 20 years — for any corporate officer who knowingly conceals PFAS contamination data; and (6) a private right of action for any person or community with documented PFAS exposure above EPA MCLs, with damages including medical monitoring costs, property value losses, and punitive damages.
PFAS chemicals are estimated to be present in the blood of approximately 97–99% of Americans.[12] The EPA finalized its first drinking water standards for PFAS in 2024, covering 6 compounds[8] — but hundreds of additional PFAS compounds remain unregulated.
ENV-PFAS-004
Proposal
PFAS Manufacturers Who Knowingly Concealed Health Risks Must Bear Full Liability for Remediation Costs and Victims' Medical Expenses — With No "Sophisticated Purchaser" Defense Available for Consumer-Facing Products
Congress must: (1) establish strict joint and several liability for all PFAS manufacturers and importers for: (a) all costs of remediating contaminated drinking water systems; (b) all costs of remediating contaminated soil and groundwater; (c) all documented medical monitoring costs for communities with PFAS exposure above EPA MCLs; (d) all documented property value losses caused by PFAS contamination; (2) prohibit any PFAS manufacturer from invoking a "sophisticated purchaser," "assumption of risk," or "government contractor" defense in any lawsuit brought by: (a) a municipal water system; (b) a state environmental agency; (c) any individual plaintiff with documented PFAS-related disease; (3) extend all statutes of limitations for PFAS claims to begin running from the date of diagnosis of any PFAS-related disease — not from the date of contamination or initial exposure; (4) require any PFAS manufacturer that receives EPA enforcement action or pays any settlement related to PFAS contamination to establish a medical monitoring trust fund for affected communities; (5) prohibit the EPA from accepting any consent decree in a PFAS case that includes a confidentiality provision shielding contamination data from the public; and (6) direct DOJ to investigate and prosecute any PFAS manufacturer executive for wire fraud or obstruction of justice where internal documents show deliberate concealment of known health risks.
Multiple PFAS manufacturers including 3M and DuPont have faced major litigation and settlements totaling billions of dollars for concealing PFAS contamination risks. PFAS exposure has been linked to kidney cancer, testicular cancer, thyroid disease, and immune suppression.
ENV-PFAS-005
Proposal
The Department of Defense Must Complete PFAS Remediation at All Contaminated Military Bases Within 10 Years, Provide Free Lifetime Healthcare to All Veterans and Family Members With PFAS Exposure, and Compensate Affected Communities
Congress must: (1) appropriate $25 billion over 10 years for the remediation of PFAS contamination at all Department of Defense installations — with enforceable milestones requiring 25% completion by year 3, 60% by year 6, and 100% by year 10; (2) require the VA to: (a) establish a PFAS Military Exposure Registry for all veterans who served at installations identified as PFAS contamination sites; (b) provide free lifetime healthcare and medical monitoring to all registered veterans and their dependents who were stationed at or resided adjacent to a contaminated installation; (c) create a rebuttable presumption of service connection for kidney cancer, testicular cancer, thyroid disease, and ulcerative colitis for veterans with documented PFAS exposure — entitling them to VA disability compensation without individually proving causation; (3) establish a Community Remediation and Compensation Fund of $5 billion for communities adjacent to military PFAS sites — compensating: (a) documented property value losses; (b) costs of alternative drinking water during remediation; (c) documented medical costs for non-veteran residents; (4) require the DOD to publicly disclose all known PFAS contamination sites, the chemicals used, and the contamination levels — prohibiting classification of this data except for active operational security reasons; and (5) establish criminal penalties — imprisonment up to 5 years — for any DOD or VA official who knowingly delays required disclosure or falsifies remediation progress reports.
The DOD has identified more than 700 military installations with known or suspected PFAS contamination from firefighting foam. PFAS from military firefighting foam has contaminated drinking water supplies for communities surrounding dozens of U.S. bases.
AGR-SUB-001
AGR-SUB-002
AGR-FDS-001
AGR-FDS-002
ENV-NUC-001
ENV-NUC-002
ENVR-CLLS-0001
Proposal
Establish a federal civil cause of action for climate damages against fossil fuel companies that engaged in documented public disinformation while knowing of climate harms
Fossil fuel companies spent decades funding disinformation campaigns about climate science while their own scientists confirmed the harm. This policy creates a federal legal cause of action so that victims of climate disasters can sue companies that deliberately misled the public while knowing their products were causing harm.
Fossil fuel companies that engaged in documented public disinformation campaigns about the causes or consequences of climate change while possessing internal scientific knowledge of those harms must be civilly liable for climate-related damages to governments, communities, and individuals; Congress must create a federal cause of action for climate damages that does not preempt state climate tort claims; the statute of limitations must not begin to run until the claimant knew or reasonably should have known of the connection between the defendant's conduct and the resulting harm; defendants may not invoke preemption under the Clean Air Act or any other federal statute as a defense to state or federal climate tort claims; criminal enforcement must be available for knowing and willful disinformation campaigns that materially delayed climate action.
Internal documents from major fossil fuel companies — including ExxonMobil and Shell — reveal that their own scientists accurately projected climate change as early as the 1970s and 1980s while those same companies funded public disinformation and industry front groups that challenged the scientific consensus. The resulting delay in climate action has imposed and will continue to impose enormous costs on governments, communities, and future generations. Numerous states and cities have filed climate liability suits; federal preemption challenges have stalled many of them, making statutory clarification that federal law does not preempt state climate tort claims essential. Criminal enforcement provides additional deterrence for conduct that amounts to systematic, knowing fraud against the public interest.
ENVR-CLLS-0002
Proposal
Codify U.S. Paris Agreement NDC commitments as binding domestic law with an automatic ratchet mechanism triggered when projected emissions exceed the NDC pathway
The U.S. made voluntary emissions pledges under the Paris Agreement that any future administration can ignore or reverse. This policy writes those climate commitments into binding domestic law and includes an automatic escalation mechanism if projected emissions fall behind the required pace.
The United States' Nationally Determined Contribution under the Paris Agreement must be enacted as binding domestic law with specific annual emissions milestones enforceable against relevant federal agencies; if EPA or interagency monitoring finds that projected emissions will exceed the NDC pathway in any five-year period, a statutory ratchet mechanism must automatically trigger accelerated compliance requirements across the highest-emitting sectors without requiring additional congressional action; withdrawal from the Paris Agreement may not be effectuated by executive order alone and must require majority congressional approval; a private right of action must be available for organizations with legal standing to enforce NDC compliance milestones against agencies that fail to implement required reductions on schedule.
The Trump administration's 2017 Paris Agreement withdrawal — reversed by executive order on the first day of the Biden administration — demonstrated that U.S. climate commitments subject to executive reversal are fundamentally unreliable for international coordination and domestic planning. Statutory codification is the only durable mechanism for making U.S. commitments credible. The automatic ratchet mechanism addresses a systematic weakness in existing climate law: targets are set, agencies delay implementation, litigation takes years, and by the time courts act the compliance window has passed. An automatic legislative trigger breaks this cycle by removing the need for further congressional action when emission projections go off-track.
ENVR-CLLS-0003
Proposal
Authorize federal mobilization-scale climate investment of at least $1 trillion per decade with priority for environmental justice communities and a five-year job guarantee for displaced fossil fuel workers
Solving climate change at the scale the science requires demands federal investment comparable to a major national mobilization — at least $1 trillion per decade. This policy directs that investment, reserves 40% for frontline communities hit hardest by pollution and climate change, and guarantees jobs for fossil fuel workers displaced by the transition.
Congress must authorize a statutory Green New Deal framework establishing federal climate investment of at least $1 trillion per decade; at least 40% of program benefits must flow to environmental justice communities and fence-line communities bearing disproportionate burdens from fossil fuel operations; all workers displaced from fossil fuel industries by the clean energy transition must receive a federally funded guarantee including full wage replacement, benefits continuation, and retraining support for a minimum of five years; the program must include direct public employment options for displaced workers who cannot be placed through private-sector retraining within 24 months; program investment must prioritize proven technologies — solar, wind, battery storage, transit electrification, and building energy efficiency — while supporting research into additional solutions; an independent audit body must report annually to Congress on deployment of funds and outcomes achieved.
The Inflation Reduction Act (2022) provided substantial climate investment through tax credits but its structure and scale fall short of the mobilization that IPCC physical science pathways indicate is needed for a 1.5°C target, and it provides inadequate managed transition support for workers in fossil-fuel-dependent communities. Unmanaged industrial transitions — from coal in Appalachia, to steel in the Midwest — demonstrate that absent deliberate federal support, economic displacement from declining industries falls hardest on workers and rural communities, fueling political backlash against the transition itself. A job guarantee is not charity — it is the structural mechanism that makes a just transition possible.
ENVR-CLLS-0004
Proposal
Require all public companies to disclose Scope 1, 2, and 3 greenhouse gas emissions and material climate risk in annual SEC filings, audited by an independent third party
Investors and the public deserve to know how much greenhouse gas pollution large companies produce and what financial risks they face from climate change. Every publicly traded company must disclose its full emissions — including from its supply chain — and climate risks in annual SEC filings, verified by an independent auditor.
All publicly traded companies must disclose Scope 1 (direct), Scope 2 (purchased energy), and Scope 3 (value chain and product-use) greenhouse gas emissions, physical climate risk to operations and assets, and transition risk in annual filings to the Securities and Exchange Commission; all climate disclosures must be attested by an independent third-party auditor using SEC-approved standards; no safe harbor from securities liability may be claimed for forward-looking climate projections made without a reasonable basis or made in bad faith; the SEC must publish enforceable disclosure standards within one year of enactment; investors and securities purchasers harmed by material misrepresentation or omission of climate risk must have a private right of action under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act.
Investors cannot accurately price climate-related financial risk without consistent, audited, comparable disclosures. Voluntary frameworks such as TCFD have produced inconsistent and self-serving disclosures because there is no enforcement consequence for underreporting. Scope 3 reporting is essential because value-chain emissions represent the majority of total emissions for most large companies in energy, manufacturing, and consumer goods sectors. The SEC's 2024 final climate disclosure rule was challenged in litigation and the Scope 3 requirement was dropped; statutory codification of all three scopes is required to prevent future administrative or judicial rollback. The private right of action provides a market-driven enforcement mechanism supplementing agency enforcement.
ENVR-CWAS-0001
Proposal
Restore Clean Water Act jurisdiction over wetlands and intermittent streams eliminated by Sackett v. EPA (2023) through statutory definition of navigable waters
The Supreme Court's 2023 Sackett ruling gutted the Clean Water Act by removing federal protection from millions of acres of wetlands and seasonal streams. This policy restores that protection by writing a clear, broad definition of protected waters into federal law — one that Congress controls, not the courts.
Congress must enact legislation restoring Clean Water Act jurisdiction over all waters with a hydrological connection to navigable waters, including wetlands adjacent to navigable waters, intermittent streams, ephemeral streams, and isolated waters that contribute to downstream water quality or flood control; the term "navigable waters" in the Clean Water Act must be defined by statute to include any water with a significant nexus to waters used in interstate commerce, overriding the plurality opinion in Sackett v. EPA (2023) which eliminated federal protections for the majority of U.S. wetland acreage; the definition must be applied using a hydrological science standard rather than a continuous surface-water connection standard; citizens, nonprofit organizations, and state attorneys general must have a private right of action to enforce CWA protections against both point-source and diffuse dischargers.
The Supreme Court's 2023 decision in Sackett v. EPA eliminated Clean Water Act protections for wetlands that lack a continuous surface connection to navigable waters, removing federal jurisdiction over an estimated 51% of previously protected U.S. wetlands and hundreds of thousands of miles of intermittent streams. Wetlands provide flood attenuation, water filtration, groundwater recharge, carbon sequestration, and critical habitat for migratory birds and aquatic species. Intermittent and ephemeral streams — which flow seasonally or only after rain — provide the majority of stream miles in arid and semi-arid regions of the West and are essential connectors in watershed water quality systems. Losing federal jurisdiction over these waters does not eliminate the ecological functions they perform; it eliminates the legal protection for those functions.
ENVR-CWAS-0002
Proposal
Require EPA to set enforceable maximum contaminant levels for nitrates, arsenic, and lead in drinking water within two years; all systems serving over 10,000 persons must test and report annually
Millions of Americans drink tap water with unsafe levels of nitrates, arsenic, or lead — but weak federal rules and lax testing make it hard to know until harm is already done. This policy requires the EPA to set enforceable safe limits for these contaminants and mandates annual testing and public reporting by all large water systems.
The EPA must establish or update legally enforceable maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for nitrates, arsenic, and lead in drinking water within two years of enactment, set at levels reflecting the best available public health evidence for safe long-term exposure; all public water systems serving more than 10,000 persons must test for these contaminants and publish results annually in a publicly accessible, machine-readable format; results must be reported in the languages spoken by 5% or more of the service population; any violation of an MCL must trigger mandatory household notification within 24 hours; the EPA must prioritize systems serving low-income communities, rural communities, and tribal nations in enforcement and remediation assistance; a private right of action must be available to any person harmed by a violation.
Elevated nitrates in drinking water — primarily from agricultural fertilizer runoff — cause methemoglobinemia in infants and are associated with colorectal cancer risk at chronic exposure levels exceeding the current 10 mg/L MCL, which was set in 1991. Arsenic in groundwater, particularly in western states and tribal communities, exceeds safe levels in hundreds of community water systems. The EPA's current lead "action level" of 15 parts per billion is not a health-based MCL — it triggers treatment responses but does not establish an enforceable safety limit; a science-based MCL with a near-zero health goal is required. These contaminants disproportionately affect rural and low-income communities that rely on small groundwater-sourced systems with limited testing capacity.
ENVR-CWAS-0003
Proposal
Establish a federal floor on western interstate water compacts requiring minimum ecological stream flows that no state allocation may deplete below
States in the American West share rivers through old legal agreements (compacts) written before climate-driven water scarcity. A federal minimum ecological flow for western rivers must protect the water needed for healthy rivers and downstream communities — no state may drain a river below that minimum, even under existing water rights.
Congress must establish a federal floor on all interstate water compacts and state water allocation systems in the Colorado River Basin and other over-allocated western watersheds that sets minimum ecological flow standards — the volume of water required to sustain aquatic ecosystems, maintain downstream agricultural viability, and support municipal supplies — below which no state, compact, or private allocation may appropriate water; federal reserved water rights on all federal lands must be recognized with priority sufficient to maintain ecological function; interstate compacts failing to incorporate minimum ecological flows must be renegotiated within a federally established timeline with federal mediation; no new consumptive water appropriations may be granted on waterways already at or below minimum ecological flow levels; states must conduct decadal assessments of aquifer recharge rates and surface water availability under projected climate conditions and may not allocate water in excess of sustainable yield.
The Colorado River Compact (1922) and other western water agreements were negotiated during anomalously wet periods and allocate more water than the rivers produce in average or drought years — a structural overallocation problem that climate change is accelerating. Lake Mead reached its lowest recorded level in 2022, triggering federally mandated cuts that illustrated the consequences of water law designed around historical maximums rather than sustainable yields. Prior appropriation doctrine ("first in time, first in right") systematically disadvantages ecological flows and junior rights holders, including many tribal nations and downstream agricultural users, in favor of older, often more extractive senior rights. Minimum ecological flow standards are a structural, not behavioral, remedy that create a legal floor the market cannot breach.
ENVR-OCNS-0001
Proposal
Designate 30% of the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone as no-take marine reserves by 2030, managed by an independent science body, with highest protection for climate refugia
Marine reserves — ocean areas where fishing and other extraction are prohibited — allow fish populations and ocean ecosystems to recover and become more resilient. Designating 30% of U.S. ocean waters as no-take reserves by 2030, managed by an independent science board, gives ocean life the space and time to rebuild.
The United States must designate at least 30% of its Exclusive Economic Zone as fully protected, no-take marine reserves by 2030 consistent with U.S. commitments under the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework; commercial fishing, mineral extraction, and all other extractive activities must be prohibited within designated reserves; fishing, aquaculture, and other uses in the remaining 70% of the EEZ must be managed by an independent fisheries science body with authority to set binding annual catch limits based on best available stock assessments, independent of political review; ocean areas identified as climate refugia — where water temperature, chemistry, and circulation patterns provide refuge from warming and acidification — must receive the highest available protection designation; NOAA must publish public reserve boundaries and annual status reports; citizens and fishing communities must have a private right of action to enforce reserve designations against unpermitted incursions.
Marine no-take reserves allow fish populations to recover to biomass levels that support greater sustainable yields in surrounding, accessible waters — a structural fisheries management tool that benefits both conservation and long-term fishing industry viability. The U.S. has committed to the 30x30 target internationally but the majority of currently "protected" marine areas allow significant extractive uses; genuine no-take designation is required to achieve the biodiversity and climate resilience benefits. Climate refugia — areas where ocean conditions remain relatively stable amid broader warming and acidification — are critical reservoirs of biodiversity and must be identified and protected before the window closes. Fishing rights in non-reserve waters managed by a science body rather than political negotiation are essential to prevent overfishing of the remaining open-water fisheries.
ENVR-OCNS-0002
Proposal
Enact a permanent statutory ban on new offshore oil and gas leases in the Atlantic, Pacific, and Gulf of Mexico and require fully funded decommissioning trusts from all current operators
Deep-sea mining would destroy some of the least-understood and most fragile ecosystems on Earth to extract minerals for batteries and electronics. It must be prohibited in all U.S. waters and actively opposed in international negotiations.
Congress must enact a permanent statutory ban on new offshore oil and gas leases in the U.S. Atlantic Ocean, Pacific Ocean, and Gulf of Mexico; expired leases may not be renewed; all current offshore operators must maintain an independently managed, third-party-audited decommissioning trust fund sized to cover the full estimated cost of plugging wells, removing platforms, and restoring the seafloor, adequately funded before any new drilling permits are issued or existing permits renewed; production from existing operations must be subject to an environmental remediation fee that accrues to a coastal resilience fund; civil and criminal enforcement must be available against unpermitted drilling and operators that fail to maintain adequate decommissioning funds; this statutory ban may not be overridden by executive order and must require affirmative congressional action to modify.
The 2010 Deepwater Horizon explosion killed 11 workers and released an estimated 4.9 million barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico — the largest marine oil spill in U.S. history — illustrating the catastrophic downside risk to coastal ecosystems, fishing industries, and tourism economies from offshore drilling. New offshore leasing is inconsistent with a science-based climate pathway; the International Energy Agency's Net Zero Emissions by 2050 scenario calls for no new oil and gas field development beyond projects already approved as of 2021. Thousands of offshore wells are in various stages of abandonment with bonds posted at a fraction of estimated full decommissioning cost, creating a potential multi-billion-dollar public liability; a funded decommissioning trust is the structural remedy that ensures polluters pay before profits are distributed.
AGR-ORG-001
Proposal
Establish a federal organic transition income support program providing five years of payments, technical assistance, and certification fee coverage for farms converting to organic production
The USDA must establish a federal Organic Transition Support Program providing annual income support payments to farms transitioning from conventional to certified organic production; payments must replace at least 80% of the estimated income loss attributable to yield reductions and organic premium lag during the mandatory three-year pre-certification transition period, continuing for up to five years; the program must cover USDA organic certification fees for all transitioning farms; technical assistance must be available through USDA extension services and certified organic transition specialists at no cost to participating farms; priority must be given to beginning farmers, socially disadvantaged operators, and small-to-mid-size farms; the program must be funded at a level sufficient to serve all qualified applicants without waitlisting in any fiscal year; private right of action for farmers wrongfully denied or terminated from program benefits.
The USDA National Organic Program's three-year transition period — during which farms must use certified organic practices but cannot command organic price premiums — is the primary economic barrier to widespread organic adoption. Without income support during this window, transition is financially prohibitive for most farms operating on thin margins. The existing Transition to Organic Partnership Program (TOPP) is chronically undersubscribed relative to demand. Expanding organic production reduces pesticide runoff into waterways, builds soil organic matter that sequesters carbon, reduces synthetic fertilizer demand, and increases on-farm and surrounding biodiversity — all public goods that justify substantial public investment in transition support.
AGR-ORG-002
Proposal
Restructure federal commodity support and crop insurance programs to eliminate the subsidy advantage of conventional monoculture over organic and diversified farming systems
Federal commodity support programs must be restructured so that conventional monoculture production does not receive proportionally greater subsidy support than diversified, organic, or regenerative systems; the USDA must redesign Agricultural Risk Coverage and Price Loss Coverage programs to use organic-market price references when calculating revenue guarantees for organic producers, not conventional price benchmarks that systematically undervalue organic production; crop insurance premium subsidies for certified organic operations must be set at rates equal to or greater than comparable conventional operations; the USDA must incorporate soil health metrics, cover cropping, and crop diversification into payment formula criteria within five years of enactment; farms that received commodity payments while transitioning to organic must not be penalized through reduced base acre eligibility; USDA must publish annual payment data disaggregated by production system type and farm size.
Federal commodity programs were designed around conventional production and systematically disadvantage organic and diversified farms. Organic crop insurance has historically been offered at higher premium rates than conventional despite facing comparable actuarial risk, and claims have used conventional price references that fail to capture the full value of organic losses. Using conventional price benchmarks in the ARC-CO program for organic producers means that revenue protection triggers based on conventional market prices frequently fail to activate when organic farmers suffer losses at organic prices. These are structural subsidies for monoculture, not just neutral market outcomes, and restructuring them is essential for genuine policy parity between farming systems.
ENVR-PSTS-0001
Proposal
Require EPA to complete re-evaluation of all pesticide registrations issued before 1996 within five years using current health and ecological science, with citizen-suit enforcement of unreasonable delay
Many pesticides were approved for use decades ago under weaker scientific standards than we have today and have never been fully reassessed. The EPA must complete a thorough re-evaluation of all pre-1996 pesticide registrations within five years, using current toxicology and environmental science.
The EPA must complete health and ecological re-evaluations of all pesticide registrations issued prior to the Food Quality Protection Act (1996) within five years of enactment; re-evaluations must apply the cumulative and aggregate exposure standards mandated by the 1996 Act, including special protections for infants and children; any registration found to fail current health or ecological risk standards must be suspended pending full registration review — grandfathering based on prior approval is prohibited; ecological risk assessments must include impacts on pollinators, aquatic invertebrates, birds, and non-target mammals; the EPA must publish complete risk evaluation findings, not only final regulatory decisions; citizens and nonprofit organizations must have a citizen-suit provision to compel re-evaluation unreasonably delayed beyond statutory deadlines, with fee-shifting in favor of prevailing plaintiffs.
Thousands of pesticides registered under pre-1996 standards have never been evaluated under the stronger health protections required by the Food Quality Protection Act, which mandated consideration of cumulative exposures from multiple pesticides, aggregate exposure across dietary and non-dietary routes, and an explicit safety factor for children. The EPA's pesticide re-evaluation backlog has persisted for decades due to inadequate funding and industry interference in the registration review process. Pesticides grandfathered under pre-1996 registrations include compounds with neurodevelopmental, endocrine-disrupting, and carcinogenic risk profiles that would likely not meet current standards. The citizen-suit provision provides a structural enforcement mechanism independent of agency budget cycles and political pressure.
ENVR-PSTS-0002
Proposal
Ban chlorpyrifos and extend the cancellation review to all organophosphate pesticides with neurodevelopmental risk profiles; establish a standing citizen-suit provision for pesticide registration challenges
Most farms rely heavily on chemical pesticides, but biological alternatives — beneficial insects, crop rotation, targeted treatments — can achieve similar results with far less environmental harm. A federal cost-share program helps farmers adopt Integrated Pest Management (using multiple strategies to reduce pesticide dependence) without bearing the full cost of the transition alone.
The EPA must cancel all food-use and residential-use registrations for chlorpyrifos and must, within three years of enactment, complete neurodevelopmental and endocrine risk assessments for all organophosphate pesticides used in contexts where dietary, residential, or occupational exposure to children is plausible; registrations for organophosphates found to share chlorpyrifos's neurodevelopmental risk profile at above de minimis exposure levels must be cancelled; any person or organization may bring a citizen suit in federal court challenging the EPA's failure to cancel, restrict, or re-evaluate a pesticide registration that poses an unreasonable risk to human health or the environment, with mandatory 60-day notice and fee-shifting in favor of prevailing plaintiffs; the EPA must issue final regulatory determinations within 12 months of a completed risk assessment or be subject to a writ of mandamus.
EPA scientists concluded in 2015 that no safe exposure threshold for chlorpyrifos exists for children's neurodevelopment and recommended banning all food uses; the Obama EPA proposed this ban in 2015, the Trump EPA reversed it under industry pressure in 2017, and the Biden EPA revoked chlorpyrifos food tolerances in 2021, which was challenged in court. This regulatory cycle of science-based findings followed by politically-motivated reversals demonstrates that substantive pesticide protections require both a statutory ban and a citizen-enforcement mechanism to prevent future rollback. Organophosphates function by inhibiting acetylcholinesterase — the same mechanism as nerve agents — and the class shares a common neurotoxic mechanism that justifies group-based review rather than compound-by-compound review subject to delay.
AGR-LBL-001
Proposal
Restore mandatory country-of-origin labeling for all meat, fish, and produce; require plain-language front-of-package GMO disclosure; prohibit uncertified "natural" claims
Congress must restore mandatory country-of-origin labeling (COOL) for all beef, pork, poultry, seafood, and fresh produce sold in the United States, including the country of birth or harvest and the country of processing; all food products containing one or more ingredients with detectable genetic modifications must be labeled "Contains Genetically Modified Ingredient(s)" in plain English on the front or principal display panel — QR-code-only or digital-only disclosure does not satisfy this requirement; the USDA must establish a "Certified Natural" standard — requiring no synthetic pesticide residues above de minimis levels, no artificial additives, and no synthetic growth promoters — and the claim "natural" on any food product may not be used without this certification; the USDA and FDA must enforce these requirements with mandatory corrective labeling, product holds, and civil penalties scaled to market share of the offending product.
The U.S. repealed mandatory COOL for beef and pork in 2015 following a WTO panel ruling; multiple legislative proposals to restore COOL with modifications that would withstand WTO challenge have failed due to meatpacking industry opposition. The 2016 National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard allows QR-code-only disclosure of GMO status, which provides no meaningful disclosure to consumers without smartphones, in food service contexts, or for processed products where the disclosable threshold is unclear. Consumer surveys consistently show strong majority support for plain-language GMO labeling and country-of-origin disclosure. The FDA has no regulatory definition of "natural" for food labeling, allowing the claim to appear on products with significant artificial content, misleading consumers who seek to purchase minimally-processed food.
AGR-RTF-001
Proposal
Prohibit federal preemption of state and local laws that set stricter environmental, food safety, pesticide, or animal welfare standards than federal minimums in agricultural and food production
Federal agricultural, environmental, and food safety law must explicitly preserve and may not preempt the authority of states and localities to enact and enforce standards stricter than the federal minimum for environmental protection, pesticide use, food safety, animal welfare, or agricultural labor practices; no federal agency may issue a rule, guidance document, or consent order that has the purpose or effect of preempting a stricter state agricultural or environmental standard; the USDA and EPA may not condition federal program participation, grant awards, or cost-share payments on state agreement to refrain from enacting stricter standards; this anti-preemption protection applies to standards enacted by state legislatures, state agencies, county governments, and municipalities with relevant regulatory jurisdiction; federal law establishes a floor — it may not establish a ceiling — on state protection of public health, environmental quality, and animal welfare in agriculture.
Federal agriculture, pesticide, and food safety law has been interpreted and applied in ways that preempt stricter state requirements, overriding democratically enacted standards that protect state residents beyond the federal minimum. California's Proposition 12 livestock confinement standards were upheld by the Supreme Court in National Pork Producers Council v. Ross (2023) on Commerce Clause grounds, but the underlying preemption vulnerability for other state standards remains. Explicit statutory anti-preemption is a pro-federalism, pro-democratic-accountability position: it preserves the ability of states to act as laboratories of environmental and food safety policy, enables faster action on emerging evidence of harm, and ensures that federal floors do not become de facto national ceilings that prevent stronger state-level protection.
ENVR-CORN-0001
Proposal
Repeal the Corn Ethanol Mandate in the Renewable Fuel Standard
Federal law currently requires that a large share of the gasoline supply be blended with corn ethanol — a mandate that drives up corn prices, strains water resources, and provides minimal climate benefit compared to other clean energy investments. This policy repeals that mandate.
Congress must repeal the corn ethanol volume requirements in the Renewable Fuel Standard; ethanol mandates must be replaced with a technology-neutral low-carbon fuel standard that rewards actual lifecycle emissions reductions without preferencing corn-derived fuels. Commodity support payments under ARC and PLC programs must be capped at $125,000 per farming operation annually regardless of corporate structure; payments to farms above 2,000 acres in total operation size must be phased out over 5 years.
Corn ethanol produces lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions comparable to or exceeding gasoline on some analyses. Approximately 40% of the U.S. corn crop is diverted to ethanol production. Corn monoculture is a leading driver of nitrate groundwater contamination in the Midwest.
ENVR-CORN-0002
Proposal
Rebalance Farm Subsidies Toward Fruits, Vegetables, and Soil Health
The federal government spends tens of billions of dollars subsidizing corn and other commodity crops, while fruits, vegetables, and practices that build healthy soil receive a fraction of that support. Farm subsidies must be rebalanced toward the foods Americans need and the farming practices that sustain the land long-term.
USDA must rebalance commodity support programs to extend price support and crop insurance parity to specialty crops — fruits, vegetables, legumes, and nuts — currently excluded from most federal commodity programs. A Soil Health Incentive Payment must be established at $35/acre annually for farmers who adopt no-till, cover cropping, or diversified rotation practices verified by NRCS. All new farm bill spending above baseline must prioritize programs directly improving diet quality and soil carbon sequestration.
ENVR-CHKN-0001
Proposal
Prohibition on Tournament-Based Poultry Grower Compensation
Contract poultry farmers are currently ranked against their neighbors to determine pay — a system that makes income unpredictable and gives companies leverage to cut costs at farmers' expense. This policy bans that tournament pay system and requires companies to compensate farmers based on objective, transparent performance standards.
Poultry integrators may not use tournament payment systems — in which grower compensation is determined by comparing each grower's flock performance against neighbors rather than against an objective cost-of-production standard — for the compensation of contract poultry growers. All poultry growing contracts must provide a transparent, objective, cost-of-production-based floor price; integrators that supply inferior chicks, feed, or veterinary inputs may not reduce grower pay on account of the resulting performance shortfall. Growers have a private right of action for compensation withheld in violation of this section.
The USDA GIPSA rule that would have banned tournament systems was withdrawn in 2012 after industry lobbying. Contract poultry growers typically earn $20,000–$30,000 annually while carrying $500,000+ in integrator-mandated facility debt.
ENVR-CHKN-0002
Proposal
Minimum Contract Rights for Contract Poultry Growers
Contract farmers who raise poultry under agreements with large corporations often have little power to negotiate fair terms or challenge unfair treatment. This policy establishes minimum contract rights — including clear payment terms, fair dispute resolution, and protection from retaliation — for all contract poultry growers.
All poultry growing contracts must have a minimum term of 5 years; integrators may not terminate a contract without 180 days written notice and a stated cause reviewable by an independent arbitrator. Growers have the right to form cooperatives and bargaining associations free from integrator retaliation; termination of a grower who participates in a growers' association is presumptively retaliatory and subject to treble damages. Integrators must disclose all input costs charged to growers and the methodology used to calculate any deductions from contract payments.
ENVR-COFF-0001
Proposal
CFTC Must Establish and Enforce Voluntary Carbon Market Integrity Standards
Carbon credits from forests — also called carbon offsets — are sold on voluntary markets where fraud and weak oversight have undermined their value and credibility. The CFTC (the federal commodity markets regulator) must set and enforce integrity standards so that a carbon credit represents real, permanent, independently verified emissions reductions.
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission must establish mandatory quality standards for voluntary carbon offset credits sold or traded in U.S. markets; standards must require that all credits represent verified, additional, measurable, and permanent emissions reductions or removals. Third-party verification by accredited independent bodies is required for all credits above 1,000 metric tons CO₂e; self-certified credits are prohibited in regulated financial products. Marketing of carbon offsets that fail to meet these standards constitutes an unfair or deceptive act or practice under Section 5 of the FTC Act; private right of action for purchasers of fraudulent credits.
Multiple investigations have found that voluntary carbon offsets — including prominent forestry programs — routinely overstate climate benefits by 75–90%.
ENVR-COFF-0002
Proposal
Forestry Offset Permanence Bond and Reversal Protocol
When forests sold as permanent carbon stores burn down or are cut, the emissions reductions those credits claimed no longer exist. This policy requires a permanence bond (a financial reserve held in trust) and a clear protocol for replacing reversed forest carbon credits with verified new ones.
All forestry-based carbon offset credits must be backed by a permanence bond equal to 25% of the credited carbon value, held in escrow by an independent trustee; the bond is forfeited to the government's climate fund if the credited forest is logged, burned, or otherwise destroyed within the credit's claimed durability period. Registries must maintain a buffer pool equivalent to 20% of total issued forestry credits as insurance against reversal events. Credits invalidated by reversal may not be replaced with credits from another project without full re-verification.
ENVR-PLST-0001
Proposal
Plastic Packaging Producers Must Fund Real Recycling Infrastructure
Plastic producers currently sell packaging without funding the systems needed to collect and recycle it — those costs fall on local governments and taxpayers. Plastic packaging producers must directly fund real recycling infrastructure, not lobby for voluntary pledges that never get built.
All producers of plastic packaging sold in U.S. commerce must join a producer responsibility organization that funds and administers curbside collection, sortation, and end-market recycling of their packaging; the system must achieve verified recycling rates of 50% by 2030 and 75% by 2035. "Verified recycling" means material actually recycled into new products, not incinerated, landfilled, or exported without documented end-use; EPR fees are set by an independent administrator and may not be passed to municipal governments. Producers that fail to meet recycling targets pay into a national Plastic Pollution Remediation Fund.
The actual U.S. recycling rate for plastics is approximately 5–6%. The plastics industry has marketed recycling as a consumer responsibility since the 1980s while knowing most plastics are not economically recyclable.
ENVR-PLST-0002
Proposal
Phase-Out of Unnecessary Single-Use Plastics by 2028
Electronics, batteries, and hazardous consumer products contain materials that are toxic in landfills and valuable if recovered — but most people have no practical way to dispose of them responsibly. Extended producer responsibility (EPR) — manufacturers funding and operating take-back programs — must apply to all these product categories.
The EPA must establish a schedule for the phase-out of unnecessary single-use plastic products — including polystyrene foodservice ware, plastic cutlery, single-use plastic bags, and plastic straws — in all federally regulated commerce by January 1, 2028. Manufacturers may petition for an exemption based on lack of functional alternatives, subject to independent review; exemptions expire after 3 years and require re-petition. States and localities may impose stricter standards; federal preemption of state plastic reduction laws is prohibited.
CNSR-FASH-0001
Proposal
Mandatory Apparel Import Supply Chain Disclosure
All apparel and footwear importers selling more than 10,000 units annually in U.S. commerce must publicly disclose the names, addresses, and ownership of all tier-1 and tier-2 manufacturing facilities; disclosure must be updated within 30 days of any supplier change. Facilities must be audited by independent third parties for compliance with ILO core labor standards; audit reports must be publicly accessible. CBP must deny entry to apparel goods produced with forced labor; brand liability attaches when the brand knew or should have known of forced labor in its supply chain.
The fast fashion industry has grown to produce an estimated 100 billion garments annually. An estimated 40–50 million garment workers worldwide — predominantly women — face poverty wages and unsafe conditions.
CNSR-FASH-0002
Proposal
Fashion Industry Environmental Footprint Disclosure and Accountability
Apparel brands with annual U.S. revenues above $100 million must disclose annually: total garments produced; aggregate water consumption; aggregate carbon emissions (Scope 1, 2, and 3); and chemical waste generated by their supply chain. Brands must set and publish science-based reduction targets aligned with a 1.5°C pathway; brands that do not meet disclosed targets face FTC deceptive practice liability if they make environmental claims in marketing. The EPA must establish textile processing wastewater standards applicable to U.S. and imported goods.
ENVR-FRCK-0001
Proposal
No New Federal Permits for Hydraulic Fracturing on Public or Tribal Lands
Public lands and tribal lands belong to all Americans — they must not be used for hydraulic fracturing ("fracking"), which risks groundwater contamination and significant methane leakage. No new fracking permits may be issued on public or tribal land.
The Department of the Interior must immediately cease issuing new permits for hydraulic fracturing operations on all federal public lands, federal offshore waters, and tribal trust lands; existing permits may continue to operate under enhanced monitoring requirements but may not be renewed beyond their original term. The BLM must conduct a comprehensive environmental impact statement on the cumulative effects of hydraulic fracturing on water quality, seismic activity, methane emissions, and public health before any moratorium is lifted. No state may preempt local government bans on fracking within municipal boundaries.
Hydraulic fracturing operations have been linked to increased seismic activity in previously stable regions and documented contamination of drinking water aquifers in multiple states.
ENVR-FRCK-0002
Proposal
All Hydraulic Fracturing Chemical Formulas Must Be Publicly Disclosed
Fracking companies use hundreds of chemicals under trade secret protections, leaving communities and regulators unable to know what is being injected into the ground near their water supplies. All fracking chemical formulas must be disclosed to the public.
Any operator conducting hydraulic fracturing must disclose to the EPA and to the public — within 30 days of well completion — the complete chemical composition of all fracturing fluids, including trade name, chemical abstract service (CAS) number, maximum concentration, and volume used per well. No trade secret exemption may be invoked to withhold chemical identity from the EPA, state health agencies, or medical providers treating patients in the affected area. The EPA must maintain a publicly searchable national fracking chemical registry updated in real time.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 ("Halliburton loophole") exempted fracking fluids from key provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act.
ENVR-FRCK-0003
Proposal
Fracking Operations Must Be Set Back One Mile from Homes, Schools, and Water Sources
Research consistently shows elevated health risks for people living within a half-mile to a mile of active fracking operations — from air pollution, noise, and chemical exposure. Fracking sites must be set back at least one mile from homes, schools, and water sources.
Federal regulations must establish a minimum one-mile setback between any active hydraulic fracturing well and any occupied residence, school, hospital, child care facility, or drinking water source; states may set greater setbacks. Communities within a five-mile radius of a proposed fracking operation must be given notice and a binding community consent vote; a majority vote against the operation prohibits the permit. Environmental justice communities — defined as census tracts in the top quartile for pollution burden — must have a supermajority (60%) community consent requirement.
ENVR-FRCK-0004
Proposal
Fracking Operators Must Post Full-Cost Reclamation Bonds Before Drilling
When fracking companies go bankrupt or walk away, taxpayers often get stuck paying to plug wells and clean up the land. Before any fracking operation begins, operators must post a full financial bond covering the complete cost of well plugging and land reclamation.
Any operator seeking a hydraulic fracturing permit must post a reclamation bond equal to the full estimated cost of plugging all wells, removing all surface equipment, and restoring the land to pre-drilling condition; bond amounts must be set by an independent actuary, not self-reported by the operator. Produced water and fracking wastewater may not be injected into Class II disposal wells located within areas of induced seismicity risk as defined by the USGS; surface disposal is prohibited. Operators with unplugged orphan wells in any state are ineligible for new federal permits.
The U.S. has an estimated 117,000+ documented orphan oil and gas wells, with cleanup costs in the billions.
ENVR-COAL-0001
Proposal
All Coal-Fired Electricity Generation Must Cease by January 1, 2030
Coal is the dirtiest source of electricity and a leading cause of air pollution, lung disease, and climate change. All coal-fired power plants must shut down by January 1, 2030 — giving utilities time to plan an orderly transition while ensuring the phase-out actually happens.
The EPA must promulgate emission standards under Section 111 of the Clean Air Act that effectively require all coal-fired power plants to retire by January 1, 2030; no new coal-fired power plants may be permitted anywhere in the United States or its territories. The DOE must establish a Just Transition Fund providing: full pension and benefits guarantees for coal workers displaced before retirement age; 5-year wage continuation at 75% of prior earnings; tuition-free job retraining; and priority hiring preferences in federally funded clean energy construction projects in coal-dependent communities.
Coal now provides approximately 16% of U.S. electricity[3] , down from over 50% in the early 2000s. Coal-fired power plants are the largest industrial source of mercury pollution in the United States.
ENVR-COAL-0002
Proposal
All Abandoned Coal Mines Must Be Cleaned Up at Industry Expense
Thousands of abandoned coal mines sit contaminated and unrestored across Appalachia and the West, polluting streams and endangering communities for decades. The coal industry — not taxpayers — must fund the full cleanup of every mine it abandoned.
The Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act must be amended to: require all active coal mining operators to post full-cost reclamation bonds before any mining begins; increase the Abandoned Mine Land Fund fee and direct the proceeds exclusively to cleanup of legacy sites with documented water quality and public health impacts; give EPA enforcement authority over acid mine drainage into navigable waters; and impose strict liability on corporate successors for reclamation obligations of acquired mining operations. No bankruptcy restructuring may discharge active reclamation obligations.
There are an estimated 500,000+ abandoned mine sites in the U.S. , with cleanup costs estimated at $50 billion or more.
ENVR-COAL-0003
Proposal
Mountaintop Removal Coal Mining Is Prohibited
Mountaintop removal blasts apart mountains to reach coal seams beneath, permanently destroying Appalachian ecosystems and burying hundreds of miles of streams under waste. This destructive practice is prohibited with no exceptions.
Mountaintop removal coal mining — including valley fills, ridge-top clearing, and the disposal of mine overburden into adjacent stream valleys — is prohibited on all lands. The Army Corps of Engineers may not issue Section 404 permits for valley fills associated with surface coal mining; the EPA must exercise its veto authority under Section 404(c) of the Clean Water Act over all pending mountaintop removal permits. Existing mountaintop removal operations must submit a phased shutdown plan within 180 days and must complete all reclamation activities within five years of cessation.
Mountaintop removal has permanently buried more than 2,000 miles of Appalachian streams. Studies link residence near mountaintop removal sites to elevated rates of cancer, birth defects, and cardiovascular disease.
ENVR-OILG-0001
Proposal
No New Federal Offshore Oil and Gas Drilling Leases May Be Issued
U.S. offshore waters belong to all Americans, not the oil industry. No new offshore oil and gas drilling leases may be issued — ending the expansion of a system that risks oil spills, harms marine ecosystems, and deepens long-term fossil fuel dependence.
The Department of the Interior must permanently withdraw from oil and gas leasing all federal offshore waters, including the Atlantic, Pacific, Gulf of Mexico (beyond current leases), and Arctic Outer Continental Shelf; Congress must codify this withdrawal by statute to prevent reversal by executive action. Existing offshore leases may continue under enhanced safety and environmental monitoring requirements but may not be expanded in acreage. The Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement must conduct annual independent safety audits of all active offshore platforms; platforms that fail two consecutive audits must cease production.
ENVR-OILG-0002
Proposal
No New Oil and Gas Drilling Permits on Federal Public and Tribal Lands After 2025
When offshore oil rigs and pipelines reach the end of their useful lives, operators often delay or avoid decommissioning (dismantling and cleanup) indefinitely, leaving aging infrastructure to rust and eventually fail. All offshore infrastructure must be fully removed at the operator's expense within five years of the end of production.
The BLM must cease issuing new oil and gas drilling permits on federal public lands and tribal trust lands after December 31, 2025; existing leases may be developed subject to strict methane monitoring, flaring prohibition, and reclamation bond requirements. The BLM must complete a comprehensive review of all existing idle and non-producing leases and cancel those that have not been developed within their lease terms without extension. Federal lands must be managed for their highest public value, including carbon sequestration, biodiversity, recreation, and watershed protection, not exclusively for resource extraction.
ENVR-OILG-0003
Proposal
Unlimited Liability for Oil Spills; Mandatory Worst-Case Discharge Planning
When offshore oil spills happen, the current legal caps on how much the responsible company must pay are far too low to cover the true environmental and economic damage. Oil spill liability limits must be doubled and operators must post full environmental restoration bonds before any new drilling begins.
The Oil Pollution Act of 1990 cap on liability for oil spills must be eliminated; oil spill responsible parties are subject to unlimited liability for all cleanup costs, natural resource damages, economic losses to affected communities, and long-term health monitoring costs. All offshore operators must submit worst-case discharge response plans based on the actual maximum volume that could be released, not industry-preferred lower estimates; plans must be reviewed and approved by the Coast Guard and EPA every three years. Offshore operators must maintain real-time blowout preventer monitoring data accessible to federal regulators.
The Deepwater Horizon spill released approximately 4.9 million barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico. BP's liability was partially capped under existing law, limiting full compensation to affected fishing and tourism industries.
ENVR-OILG-0004
Proposal
The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Coastal Plain Is Permanently Closed to Oil Development
Coastal communities, beaches, fisheries, and marine ecosystems within 50 miles of shore are most vulnerable to offshore drilling accidents. Drilling must be prohibited within that distance from any U.S. coastline.
Congress must permanently withdraw the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) coastal plain from oil and gas leasing and permanently prohibit any drilling, seismic exploration, or industrial development within ANWR; this prohibition may only be reversed by a two-thirds vote of both chambers of Congress. All existing ANWR leases, including those issued after the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act provision opening the coastal plain, must be cancelled with full refund of lease payments; legal challenges to cancellation must be defended by the DOJ. The Fish and Wildlife Service must develop a comprehensive conservation management plan for ANWR that prioritizes subsistence uses by Indigenous Alaskan communities.
ENVR-RFNY-0001
Proposal
No New Oil Refinery Construction or Capacity Expansion Permits After 2025
Building new oil refineries or expanding existing ones only makes sense if you plan to keep burning oil for decades — the opposite of what the climate requires. No new refinery construction or capacity expansion permits may be issued after 2025.
The EPA must deny all air construction permits (PSD and non-attainment New Source Review) for new petroleum refinery construction or major capacity expansions after December 31, 2025; existing refineries may continue operating under enhanced monitoring requirements but may not increase throughput capacity above current permitted levels. The EPA must update Tier 3 fuel standards to achieve maximum feasible reductions in refinery emissions of sulfur dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, benzene, and particulate matter; compliance schedules must not exceed three years. Refinery operators must post financial assurance covering the full cost of decommissioning before any new permit is issued.
ENVR-RFNY-0002
Proposal
All Petroleum Refineries Must Monitor and Publicly Report Fenceline Air Quality in Real Time
Oil refineries are a major source of air pollution, including toxic compounds linked to cancer and respiratory disease in nearby communities. All operating refineries must meet current EPA air quality standards within five years — not just new facilities.
All petroleum refineries must install and maintain continuous fenceline air quality monitors measuring at minimum: benzene, hydrogen sulfide, particulate matter (PM2.5), sulfur dioxide, and VOCs; monitoring data must be transmitted to the EPA in real time and published on a publicly accessible website within one hour of collection. When fenceline benzene concentrations exceed 9 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m³) as a monthly average , the refinery must investigate and reduce emissions within 45 days or face an automatic permit suspension. Monitoring data may be used in civil litigation by affected community members without further evidentiary foundation.
ENVR-RFNY-0003
Proposal
No New Petrochemical Facilities May Be Sited in Environmental Justice Communities
Refineries that eventually shut down must be fully cleaned up, but cleanup costs are often abandoned to the public when companies fail or walk away. Before expanding capacity, refinery operators must post full decommissioning bonds — deposits held in trust to fund cleanup when the time comes.
The EPA must establish a cumulative impact analysis requirement for all new major source air permits: no permit may be issued for a petroleum refinery, petrochemical plant, or liquefied natural gas facility in a census tract that is already in the top 25% nationally for any single pollution indicator (air toxics, particulate matter, hazardous waste proximity, or water contamination). Existing environmental justice communities with two or more major industrial facilities must be designated as pollution priority zones, with mandatory emission reduction targets of 30% within five years and 50% within ten years. States that fail to implement these standards forfeit EPA air grant funding.
Communities of color are disproportionately sited near refineries and petrochemical facilities — studies show Black Americans are exposed to 56% more air pollution than they generate through consumption.
ENVR-NGAS-0001
Proposal
No New Natural Gas Pipelines, Compressor Stations, or Distribution Infrastructure After 2026
Building new natural gas pipelines, compressor stations, or distribution infrastructure after 2026 locks in decades of additional fossil fuel use and methane leakage. No new gas infrastructure may be built after that date — investment must shift to clean alternatives instead.
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) may not approve new natural gas pipeline certificates of public convenience and necessity after December 31, 2026; the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration may not permit new interstate natural gas transmission infrastructure; and state public utility commissions may not approve new gas distribution main extensions in areas served by existing electric infrastructure. Projects already under construction with valid permits may be completed. FERC must revise its Certificate Policy Statement to require full lifecycle greenhouse gas accounting, environmental justice analysis, and a demonstration that new gas infrastructure is not redundant to existing capacity or clean alternatives. Willful circumvention of these permit prohibitions by any agency official or regulated entity is subject to criminal penalties including imprisonment; any community or person harmed by unlawfully approved infrastructure has a private right of action for injunctive relief and damages.
The U.S. has over 3 million miles of natural gas pipelines. FERC has approved nearly every gas pipeline application it has received in recent decades.
ENVR-NGAS-0002
Proposal
All Natural Gas Infrastructure Must Detect and Repair Methane Leaks Within 30 Days
The pipes delivering gas to homes and apartments across the country leak methane — a potent greenhouse gas — and expose residents to indoor air pollution. All residential gas distribution lines must be replaced or shut down by 2040 as homes transition to electric heating and appliances.
The EPA must promulgate regulations requiring all natural gas production, processing, transmission, and distribution operators to: conduct quarterly leak detection surveys using optical gas imaging or equivalent technology; repair all detected leaks within 30 days of detection or immediately shut in the leaking equipment; report all detected leaks to the EPA within 48 hours; and achieve a system-wide methane loss rate of no more than 0.2% of throughput by 2028. Routine flaring and venting of methane at production sites is prohibited except for verified safety emergencies; operators that exceed the 0.2% threshold must fund verified offset projects at a 3:1 ratio while achieving compliance. Knowing and willful violations of leak detection, repair, or reporting requirements are subject to criminal penalties; affected communities and environmental organizations have a private right of action to enforce these standards where the EPA fails to act within 90 days of a verified complaint.
Methane is approximately 80 times more potent than CO₂ as a greenhouse gas over a 20-year period. The natural gas system leaks an estimated 2.3% of production according to some studies.
ENVR-NGAS-0003
Proposal
No New Liquefied Natural Gas Export Terminal Permits Until Climate Impact Review Is Complete
Starting in 2027, all newly constructed buildings must be designed without natural gas connections. Building gas-free from the start is far cheaper and less disruptive than retrofitting later, and it sets a clear path toward eliminating fossil fuel combustion from the built environment.
The Department of Energy must impose a moratorium on approvals of new liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminal permits and expansions of existing LNG terminals until: the DOE completes a comprehensive assessment of the full lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions of U.S. LNG exports including upstream methane leakage; FERC revises its environmental review process to include downstream combustion emissions; and Congress passes legislation setting a binding cap on total U.S. LNG export capacity consistent with U.S. climate commitments under the Paris Agreement. Existing operational LNG export terminals may continue under enhanced methane monitoring requirements. Any DOE official who approves LNG permits in violation of this moratorium is subject to criminal penalties; any person or community harmed by unlawfully approved LNG terminal construction or operation has a private right of action for injunctive relief and compensatory damages.
The Biden administration paused new LNG export approvals in January 2024 for a climate review. The U.S. became the world's largest LNG exporter in 2023.
ENVR-NGAS-0004
Proposal
New Building Construction May Not Install Natural Gas Appliances After 2027
New buildings starting in 2027 must use all-electric systems for heating, cooking, and hot water. Electric appliances powered by a clean grid produce zero in-home air pollution — gas appliances cannot match that, no matter how efficient they become.
The Department of Energy must set appliance efficiency standards that effectively require all newly manufactured residential and commercial furnaces, water heaters, stoves, and dryers to be electric-ready or all-electric by January 1, 2027; no new building construction permit may require natural gas service connections after that date. Existing buildings must transition to electric appliances upon major renovation or appliance replacement; the DOE must fund a low-income household electrification rebate program of up to $14,000 per household for heat pump installation, electric water heater replacement, and electric panel upgrades. Landlords may not pass appliance electrification costs to tenants. Manufacturers that knowingly certify non-compliant appliances as compliant are subject to criminal penalties for willful violations; tenants harmed by landlords who illegally shift electrification costs have a private right of action for treble damages and attorney fees.
Gas stoves emit nitrogen dioxide, benzene, and other pollutants at levels that can exceed EPA outdoor air quality standards indoors. Buildings account for approximately 13% of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions.
ENVR-NGAS-0005
Proposal
All Natural Gas Distribution Utilities Must File Binding Decarbonization Plans
Gas utilities must publish clear, public timelines for transitioning their customers to electric alternatives — not keep extending gas service indefinitely. Transparency about the transition lets households and landlords plan ahead.
All regulated natural gas distribution utilities must file with their state public utility commission a binding decarbonization plan by January 1, 2026, showing how the utility will achieve a 50% reduction in throughput by 2035 and 100% reduction by 2045; plans must include: managed transition of existing customers to electric alternatives; no cost-shifting of stranded gas infrastructure costs onto remaining ratepayers; workforce transition plans for gas utility workers; and timeline for retirement of distribution mains. State commissions must approve, reject, or modify plans within 18 months. Utilities that fail to file plans are ineligible for rate increases. Utilities that file false or materially misleading decarbonization plans are subject to criminal referral for fraud; ratepayers and environmental organizations have a private right of action to enforce plan compliance and to recover stranded cost shifts imposed in violation of this section.
ENVR-NGAS-0006
Proposal
All Federal Buildings Must Eliminate Natural Gas Use by 2030
No household may have its gas service shut off before an affordable, functioning electric alternative is available and accessible to that household. Protecting people from losing heat and cooking access during the transition is a basic obligation of the policy.
The General Services Administration must develop and execute a plan to eliminate natural gas use in all federal buildings by December 31, 2030, transitioning to electric heating, cooling, and cooking; the plan must prioritize buildings in environmental justice communities and buildings with the highest energy use intensity. New federal building construction after January 1, 2025, must be all-electric; no new natural gas service connections may be installed in any federal building. The GSA must publish annual progress reports on electrification; the federal government's electrification must serve as a model and demand signal for the broader building electrification market. GSA officials who authorize new natural gas connections in violation of this section are subject to criminal penalties; citizens and affected communities have a private right of action to enforce this section's prohibition against new gas connections in federal buildings.
ENVR-ADPT-0001
Proposal
The Federal Government Must Fund Voluntary Buyouts for Communities in High-Risk Flood and Climate Hazard Zones
Some neighborhoods face repeated, catastrophic flooding that no amount of rebuilding can fix, and climate change is making it worse. The federal government must fund voluntary buyout programs so families in the highest-risk flood and climate hazard zones can relocate to safer ground before the next disaster.
Congress must establish and fully fund a federal Managed Retreat and Community Resilience Program that: provides voluntary, fair-market buyouts for homeowners and renters in communities facing repeated flooding, sea level rise, or catastrophic wildfire risk; prioritizes low-income communities and communities of color, which are disproportionately located in high-risk zones due to historical redlining and discriminatory zoning; funds community relocation as a whole — not piecemeal abandonment — including infrastructure, community centers, and public services; and guarantees replacement housing of equivalent quality in lower-risk areas at no net cost to relocated residents. Buyout offers must be based on pre-disaster fair market value, not post-disaster depressed values. Participation is voluntary; no community may be forced to relocate. The program must be funded at no less than $10 billion per year. Federal officials who condition buyout offers on community agreement to waive future federal disaster assistance are subject to criminal penalties; any homeowner or renter who is denied a lawful buyout, offered below-fair-market compensation, or subjected to retaliatory withdrawal of a buyout offer has a private right of action for injunctive relief and compensatory damages.
Flooding is the most costly and frequent natural disaster in the United States. Communities of color are disproportionately located in flood-prone areas due to decades of racially discriminatory housing and land use policy. The FEMA Hazard Mitigation Grant Program has been chronically underfunded and difficult to access for low-income communities.
ENVR-ADPT-0002
Proposal
FEMA Must Fund Climate-Resilient Rebuilding, Not Reconstruction of Flood-Prone Structures
After floods, FEMA often funds rebuilding the same structures in the same flood-prone spots, guaranteeing future losses. This policy redirects disaster recovery funds toward stronger, climate-resilient construction rather than repeating the same cycle of damage and reconstruction.
The FEMA "50% rule" — which requires structures damaged more than 50% of their value to be brought into full compliance with current floodplain management standards — must be reformed to: apply to all federally insured and FEMA-assisted structures after any damage event, not just those exceeding the 50% threshold; fund resilient rebuilding to higher standards as the default, not reconstruction in kind; and prohibit federal flood insurance and federal disaster assistance for repeated flood losses on the same property unless the owner is in an active buyout or relocation process. FEMA must prioritize climate-resilient infrastructure investments — including green infrastructure, elevated structures, and natural floodplain restoration — over hard armoring. The National Flood Insurance Program must be reformed to reflect actuarial risk; premiums for high-risk, high-value properties must not be subsidized at the expense of the general fund. FEMA officials who approve reconstruction assistance for properties in active violation of this section's repeated-loss prohibition are subject to criminal penalties; any community or property owner whose resilient-rebuilding application is improperly denied has a private right of action for injunctive relief and recovery of wrongfully withheld funds.
Federal disaster assistance and flood insurance have subsidized repeated rebuilding in flood-prone areas, creating a "moral hazard" that accelerates climate exposure. Some properties have flooded and received federal assistance more than five times.
ENVR-ADPT-0003
Proposal
The Federal Government Must Support Americans Displaced by Climate Disasters and Chronic Climate Stress
Wildfires, hurricanes, rising seas, and extreme heat are forcing people from their homes — sometimes permanently. The federal government must provide real support — housing assistance, job training, and relocation help — for Americans displaced by climate conditions, whether from a single disaster or the slow creep of chronic climate stress.
Congress must establish a Domestic Climate Displacement Assistance Program that: provides relocation grants, housing assistance, and job transition support to individuals and families who are displaced by climate disasters or whose communities face chronic uninhabitability due to climate change; guarantees that climate-displaced people do not lose access to Social Security, Medicaid, SNAP, or other federal benefits during relocation; funds workforce retraining for workers in fossil fuel and climate-vulnerable industries; and establishes a Climate Displacement Registry to track chronic climate displacement and ensure affected communities receive proportional federal assistance. International climate refugees — individuals displaced by climate change in their home countries — must receive dedicated visa pathways and must be recognized as a protected class under U.S. immigration and refugee law. Federal officials who deny or delay climate displacement benefits in bad faith, or who condition benefits on waiver of future legal claims, are subject to criminal penalties; any displaced person who is unlawfully denied benefits or loses federal benefit continuity during relocation has a private right of action for injunctive relief, benefit restoration, and damages.
Hundreds of thousands of Americans have been displaced by climate disasters in recent years. Some U.S. communities — including several in Alaska and Louisiana — are already uninhabitable due to sea level rise and erosion.
ENVR-ADPT-0004
Proposal
All Federally Funded Infrastructure Projects Must Meet Climate Resilience Standards
Bridges, roads, water systems, and other infrastructure built with federal dollars must be designed to last in a changing climate. All federally funded projects must meet resilience standards that account for future flooding, extreme heat, and storms — not just the weather conditions of the past.
All federally funded infrastructure projects — including roads, bridges, water systems, public buildings, and transit — must be designed and built to withstand projected climate conditions over their design lifetime, using NOAA and IPCC climate projections; projects that fail to meet resilience standards may not receive federal funding. Federal infrastructure investment must prioritize green infrastructure solutions — including urban tree canopy, permeable surfaces, living shorelines, restored wetlands, and urban parks — alongside or instead of hard armoring wherever effective; green infrastructure must receive no less than 20% of federal stormwater and flood mitigation funding. The Army Corps of Engineers must integrate climate resilience and nature-based solutions into all project planning and must update its cost-benefit analysis methodology to account for long-term climate costs and ecosystem services. Federal officials who certify resilience compliance for projects that knowingly fail NOAA or IPCC standard thresholds are subject to criminal penalties for false certification; any community harmed by a federally funded infrastructure failure attributable to non-compliance with the resilience standards established by this section has a private right of action against the certifying agency for damages and injunctive relief.
ENVR-FSIL-0001
Proposal
The United States Must Immediately End Over $20 Billion in Annual Federal Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Redirect All Savings to Clean Energy and Worker Transition
The federal government currently gives over $20 billion per year in tax breaks and royalty relief to oil, gas, and coal companies — money that should be driving the clean energy transition. All fossil fuel subsidies must end immediately, and the savings must be redirected to clean energy and worker support.
Congress must repeal all federal tax preferences, direct subsidies, and below-market royalty arrangements that benefit fossil fuel extraction, production, refining, and distribution, including: (1) the intangible drilling costs deduction (26 U.S.C. § 263(c)), the percentage depletion allowance (26 U.S.C. § 613), the domestic manufacturing deduction for oil and gas producers, and all accelerated depreciation schedules for fossil fuel equipment; (2) all below-market federal land and offshore lease royalty rates — federal royalties must equal the fair market value of resources extracted, with the Department of Interior required to update royalty rates annually to market benchmarks; (3) all Export-Import Bank and Development Finance Corporation financing for overseas fossil fuel projects; and (4) any federal loan guarantee or credit support for new fossil fuel infrastructure. All revenues recovered must be deposited into a Just Transition Fund to support displaced workers and communities. No new fossil fuel subsidies may be enacted without a supermajority in Congress and a public cost-benefit analysis showing net climate and social benefit.
Federal fossil fuel subsidies total an estimated $20 billion or more annually in direct tax expenditures alone, with additional implicit subsidies through underpriced public land leases and failure to price carbon externalities. The IMF estimates total fossil fuel subsidies — including unpriced externalities — exceed $660 billion annually in the U.S. alone.
ENVR-FSIL-0002
Proposal
Hydraulic Fracturing Must Be Banned on All Federal Lands Immediately and Phased Out Nationally With Binding Environmental Justice Standards
Hydraulic fracturing ("fracking") on federal lands must end now, and a national phase-out of fracking must proceed under binding environmental justice standards that protect communities — often low-income and communities of color — most burdened by its health and environmental impacts.
The federal government must: (1) immediately ban all new hydraulic fracturing permits on federal lands and waters, and decline to renew any existing fracking permits on federal lands upon expiration; (2) require the EPA to finalize national methane emissions standards for all existing fracking operations that achieve at least a 65% reduction in methane leakage within three years; (3) direct the EPA to establish a National Fracking Phase-Out Plan that ends all fracking operations by 2035, prioritizing phase-out first in environmental justice communities — defined as communities of color, low-income communities, or communities with existing elevated pollution burdens within 1 mile of active fracking wells; (4) require all fracking operators to fully disclose all chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing fluid to the EPA and to affected communities, with no trade secret exemption; (5) establish a federal Fracking Community Remediation Fund to remediate contaminated water supplies, restore damaged land, and compensate property owners harmed by fracking operations, financed by a per-well fee on all existing and future operations; and (6) impose criminal liability on operators who contaminate drinking water supplies. Any person or community whose water supply is contaminated by fracking operations, or who suffers property damage attributable to induced seismicity from fracking, has a private right of action for injunctive relief, remediation costs, and compensatory damages.
Fracking operations have been linked to groundwater contamination, increased seismic activity, and elevated methane emissions — a potent greenhouse gas. An estimated 17 million Americans live within one mile of an active oil or gas well, with disproportionate concentration in communities of color.
ENVR-FSIL-0003
Proposal
All Coal-Fired Power Plants Must Be Retired by 2030 With a Federally Funded Just Transition for Workers and Communities
All coal-fired power plants must close by 2030, and every affected worker and community must receive federally funded support — including income replacement, retraining, and community economic development funding. The coal phase-out must be planned and supported, not abrupt and abandoned.
Congress must enact a Coal Phase-Out Act that: (1) prohibits the issuance of any new coal mining permits on federal lands and directs the Department of Interior to decline renewal of all existing federal coal leases upon expiration; (2) prohibits any new coal-fired electricity generating capacity from being permitted or constructed anywhere in the United States; (3) establishes a mandatory coal plant retirement schedule — all coal plants must cease operation by December 31, 2030 — with the EPA authorized to close non-compliant plants and recover costs from operators; (4) establishes a $100 billion Coal Community Just Transition Fund providing: (a) five years of full wage replacement and benefits continuation for all displaced coal workers; (b) retraining and job placement in clean energy sectors prioritized in affected communities; (c) economic diversification grants to coal-dependent municipalities; and (d) full remediation of all coal ash impoundments and abandoned mine lands at federal expense; and (5) requires all coal operators to contribute to the Just Transition Fund at a rate of $5 per ton of coal mined in the five years before retirement. Coal company executives who knowingly continue operating coal plants past the mandatory retirement date are subject to criminal penalties; any worker who is denied just transition benefits, or any community that fails to receive economic diversification funding it is entitled to, has a private right of action for benefit recovery and injunctive relief.
U.S. coal-fired power generation has declined dramatically but still accounts for approximately 16% of electricity generation. Coal mining and power plant communities face severe economic distress with few alternative economic anchors. Coal ash impoundments contain toxic heavy metals and have been the source of catastrophic spills.
ENVR-FSIL-0004
Proposal
No New Oil and Gas Drilling Leases May Be Issued on Federal Lands or Offshore Waters, and All Existing Federal Leases Must Be Retired by 2035
No new oil and gas drilling leases may be issued on federal lands or in offshore waters, and all existing federal leases must be retired by 2035. Public land must not be committed to decades of additional fossil fuel extraction when the world urgently needs to decarbonize.
The federal government must: (1) immediately declare a permanent moratorium on all new oil and gas leasing on federal onshore lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management and on the Outer Continental Shelf; (2) decline to renew any existing federal oil and gas lease upon expiration and prohibit lease extensions beyond the primary term; (3) establish a Federal Lease Wind-Down Program that: (a) offers voluntary buyouts at fair market value to operators with existing federal leases who agree to permanently surrender them; (b) requires all federal lease operators to fully restore well sites and remediate land at their expense upon lease expiration; and (c) prohibits transfer or assignment of expiring federal leases to new operators; (4) ban all new oil and gas drilling within 25 miles of any coastline, national park, wilderness area, or source watershed; and (5) prohibit the export of crude oil produced from federal lands or offshore leases. Criminal penalties apply to any operator who drills without a valid lease or fails to remediate a federal well site. Any community or property owner harmed by unremediated federal well sites, or by drilling within a protected buffer zone, has a private right of action for injunctive relief, remediation costs, and compensatory damages.
The federal government manages approximately 700 million acres of onshore mineral rights and vast offshore acreage — production from these lands accounts for approximately a quarter of U.S. oil and gas output. The Inflation Reduction Act (2022) required new offshore leasing as a condition of clean energy provisions, a compromise widely criticized by climate advocates.
ENVR-MINE-0001
Proposal
The General Mining Act of 1872 Must Be Replaced — Mining Companies Must Pay Market-Rate Royalties and Post Full Remediation Bonds
The General Mining Act of 1872 — older than the lightbulb — allows mining companies to extract gold, silver, and other hardrock minerals from federal public land without paying royalties to the American people and often without posting adequate cleanup bonds. Mining companies must pay fair market-rate royalties and deposit full reclamation bonds before any permit is granted.
Congress must repeal the General Mining Act of 1872 and replace it with a framework that: (1) imposes a royalty of 12.5% of gross revenues on all hard rock mineral extraction from federal lands — the same rate applied to oil and gas — replacing the current $0 royalty; (2) requires all mining permit applicants to post a full-cost remediation bond sufficient to cover 100% of estimated cleanup costs before any extraction begins, determined by an independent third-party environmental engineer; (3) prohibits the issuance of new federal mining patents that allow mining companies to purchase federal land at $5 per acre — the 1872 price — ending this permanent giveaway; (4) directs the EPA and Department of Interior to establish a National Abandoned Mine Remediation Fund financed by the new royalties to clean up an estimated 500,000 abandoned hardrock mine sites nationwide; (5) requires all federal mining permit applications to undergo a full National Environmental Policy Act review including cumulative impacts analysis; and (6) imposes criminal liability on any mining operator who abandons a mine site without remediation, with the company's directors and officers personally liable for cleanup costs.
The 1872 Mining Law allows mining companies to extract gold, silver, copper, and other hard rock minerals from federal land without paying any royalty — a giveaway estimated at hundreds of millions of dollars annually. An estimated 500,000 abandoned hard rock mine sites contaminate watersheds across the American West.
ENVR-CHEM-0001
Proposal
PFAS Forever Chemicals Must Be Regulated at the Strictest Safe Level, Phased Out of All Non-Essential Uses, and Manufacturers Must Fund Cleanup
PFAS are synthetic "forever chemicals" — found in thousands of products — that accumulate in human bodies and have been linked to cancer, thyroid disease, and immune system damage. This policy sets the strictest safe limits for PFAS, phases them out of non-essential uses, and requires the companies that profited from them to fund the cleanup.
Congress and the EPA must: (1) finalize and defend EPA's maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 4 parts per trillion (ppt) for PFOA and PFOS in drinking water and establish MCLs for all other PFAS compounds within two years; (2) designate all PFAS compounds as hazardous substances under CERCLA (Superfund), making manufacturers and users liable for contaminated site cleanup costs; (3) enact a phase-out of all PFAS in non-essential uses — including food packaging, cookware coatings, carpeting, and cosmetics — by 2028, with "essential use" defined narrowly and subject to a public petition process; (4) require all manufacturers and users of PFAS to publicly disclose annual PFAS use by compound and quantity to the EPA's Toxics Release Inventory; (5) establish a federal PFAS Remediation Fund of $10 billion, financed by a fee on PFAS manufacturers proportional to historical production, to provide safe water to the estimated 200 million Americans with PFAS in their drinking water; and (6) provide a private right of action for any individual harmed by PFAS contamination, with a 20-year statute of limitations and joint and several liability for all manufacturers.
PFAS chemicals are found in the blood of approximately 99% of Americans. PFAS have been linked to cancer, thyroid disease, immune system disruption, and reproductive harm. 3M and DuPont/Chemours knew for decades that PFAS chemicals were accumulating in human blood and concealed this information.
ENVR-CHEM-0002
Proposal
Natural Gas Is Not a Climate Solution — No New LNG Export Terminals May Be Built and Methane Must Be Regulated as a Climate Pollutant Under the Clean Air Act
Natural gas is primarily methane — a greenhouse gas far more potent than carbon dioxide over the short term. No new facilities to export liquefied natural gas (LNG) may be built, and methane leaking from gas operations must be regulated and sharply reduced under the Clean Air Act.
The federal government must: (1) impose a moratorium on all new liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminal permits — the Department of Energy may not issue any new authorizations for LNG export to non-free-trade-agreement countries, and FERC may not approve any new LNG terminal construction; (2) direct the EPA to formally designate methane as a pollutant that endangers public welfare under Section 202 of the Clean Air Act, triggering mandatory emissions standards for all sectors; (3) require the EPA to finalize methane regulations achieving at least a 75% reduction in methane emissions from the oil and gas sector — from drilling through distribution — within five years; (4) prohibit all routine flaring and venting of natural gas from any facility receiving a federal permit or operating on federal land, with criminal penalties for willful violations; (5) require all natural gas utilities to develop binding net-zero transition plans that eliminate residential gas hookups by 2035 in new construction; and (6) end all federal financing for natural gas infrastructure through the Export-Import Bank and Development Finance Corporation.
Methane is approximately 80 times more potent as a greenhouse gas than CO₂ over a 20-year period. The fossil fuel industry's promotion of natural gas as a "bridge fuel" has been widely criticized by climate scientists as a strategy to delay renewable energy transition.
ENVR-CHEM-0003
Proposal
No New Industrial Pollution Permits May Be Issued in Already-Overburdened Communities and All Permitting Must Use a Cumulative Impact Standard
Some communities are surrounded by factories, refineries, and other industrial facilities and already bear far more pollution than the rest of the country. No new industrial permits may be issued in these overburdened communities, and all permitting must weigh the cumulative (total, combined) pollution burden — not just one new facility in isolation.
The EPA must: (1) establish a binding cumulative impact standard for all Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act permits — permit decisions must consider the total existing pollution burden in the affected community, not just the incremental impact of the new facility; (2) impose an immediate moratorium on all new industrial facility permits in any census tract identified by EPA's EJScreen tool as in the 80th percentile or above for environmental burden, until existing facilities come into compliance with all applicable standards; (3) require all federal agencies to conduct environmental justice analyses for any major federal action — defined as any action affecting communities with populations above 40% people of color or 40% low-income — using cumulative impact methodology; (4) establish an Office of Environmental Justice within the EPA with independent enforcement authority and a dedicated budget of $2 billion annually; (5) require all state environmental agencies receiving EPA delegated authority to adopt equivalent cumulative impact standards or have their delegated authority revoked; and (6) provide a private right of action under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act for communities that can demonstrate discriminatory environmental permitting.
People of color are 28% more likely to live near a hazardous waste facility than white Americans. The EPA's own EJScreen tool identifies thousands of communities simultaneously burdened by multiple pollution sources, but this data has historically not been used in permit decisions.
AGRI-FARM-0001
Proposal
The Exploitative Poultry Tournament System Must Be Banned and the Packers and Stockyards Act Must Be Enforced to Protect Contract Farmers
Poultry companies rank contract farmers against each other to determine their pay — a rigged system that keeps farmers in debt regardless of how well they perform. This policy bans that "tournament" pay system and requires enforcement of existing federal protections for contract farmers who raise chickens and livestock for large companies.
Congress must: (1) ban the "tournament system" in poultry production — the practice of ranking growers against each other and adjusting pay based on relative performance rather than absolute production costs — which transfers financial risk entirely to contract growers while giving integrators complete control over inputs, genetics, and feed quality; (2) require all poultry and livestock production contracts to guarantee a minimum base payment that covers the grower's actual cost of production plus a reasonable profit, independent of tournament rankings; (3) strengthen enforcement of the Packers and Stockyards Act by: (a) restoring the USDA rule that a competitive injury need not be proven to establish a violation; (b) requiring all production contracts to be in writing with a minimum 5-year term and automatic renewal unless the integrator can demonstrate legitimate cause for non-renewal; (c) prohibiting integrators from requiring growers to make capital improvements as a condition of contract renewal; (4) provide growers a private right of action to sue integrators for violations of the Packers and Stockyards Act, including breach of contract and retaliatory non-renewal, with treble damages and attorney's fees; and (5) impose criminal penalties on integrators who falsify flock performance data used in tournament calculations.
Contract poultry growers invest an average of $1 million or more in facilities owned on their land but controlled by integrators, often ending up indebted and unable to exit contracts. Companies like Tyson, Perdue, and Koch Foods control over 90% of the U.S. poultry market.
AGRI-FARM-0002
Proposal
Agricultural Workers Must Have Full Labor Rights Including the Right to Organize, Safe Working Conditions, and Protection From Visa Exploitation
Farmworkers grow the food we eat, but many lack the basic rights most workers take for granted — like the ability to form a union, work in safe conditions, or challenge exploitation under farm worker visa programs. This policy guarantees agricultural workers the same full labor protections that apply to workers in every other sector.
Congress must: (1) amend the National Labor Relations Act to remove the agricultural worker exemption, extending full NLRA coverage — including the right to organize, collectively bargain, and strike — to all farmworkers, including those employed by family farms with more than five employees; (2) reform the H-2A agricultural guestworker visa program by: (a) prohibiting employers from charging workers recruitment fees or transportation costs; (b) requiring all H-2A workers to be provided with written contracts in their native language before departing their home country; (c) allowing H-2A workers to change employers without losing status; (d) establishing a federal hotline and legal services program for H-2A workers to report abuse; (3) require OSHA to enforce heat illness prevention standards for all outdoor agricultural workers, with the same 80°F/90°F trigger requirements as other outdoor industries; (4) require the EPA to establish a federal Agricultural Worker Protection Standard that mandates pesticide application buffer zones, mandatory notification to workers of pesticide use, and annual medical monitoring for workers regularly exposed to organophosphate pesticides; and (5) provide farmworkers a private right of action for retaliation, wage theft, and unsafe working conditions with a 5-year statute of limitations.
The NLRA explicitly excludes agricultural workers — a legacy of New Deal compromises designed to exclude Black Southern workers. Farmworkers experience among the highest rates of pesticide exposure and heat illness of any U.S. occupation.
AGRI-FARM-0003
Proposal
Federal Corn and Commodity Subsidies Must Be Decoupled From Production Volume and Redirected to Soil Health, Diversification, and Climate Resilience
Federal farm subsidies currently pay more to farmers who grow more corn and other commodity crops — rewarding volume over everything else, including soil health. This policy redirects those payments toward farmers who build healthy soil, diversify their crops, and farm in ways that hold up against drought, flooding, and other climate pressures.
Congress must reform federal commodity support programs by: (1) eliminating all direct payments, price loss coverage, and agricultural risk coverage payments that are calculated based on planted acreage or production volume for corn, soybeans, cotton, and wheat — which incentivize monoculture and overproduction; (2) redirecting all commodity support savings into: (a) a $10 billion/year Soil Health and Conservation Program that pays farmers per acre for adopting cover cropping, no-till farming, crop rotation, and riparian buffer practices; (b) a Beginning Farmer Support Fund providing grants and low-interest loans for farmers transitioning to diversified production; (c) a Local and Regional Food Systems Fund supporting farmers markets, food hubs, and institutional purchasing of locally grown food; (3) prohibiting any corn ethanol mandate from exceeding 10% of the Renewable Fuel Standard — redirecting ethanol mandates to genuinely advanced cellulosic biofuels; (4) capping any remaining commodity support payments at $50,000 per farm per year, eliminating the majority of subsidies that flow to large agribusinesses; and (5) requiring all farms receiving federal conservation payments to develop and comply with a nutrient management plan.
Federal corn subsidies have contributed to overproduction of corn, driving down prices and flooding markets with high-fructose corn syrup and subsidized ethanol. The largest 10% of farm operations receive approximately 75% of all commodity subsidy payments.[9]
AGRI-FOOD-0001
Proposal
Every American Must Have Access to Fresh, Affordable, Healthy Food Within a Reasonable Distance of Their Home
Millions of Americans — especially in rural areas and low-income neighborhoods — live in "food deserts" where there is no nearby store selling fresh, healthy food. The federal government must act to ensure every person has access to nutritious food within a reasonable distance of their home.
Congress must: (1) establish a $5 billion Healthy Food Financing Initiative providing grants and loans to full-service grocery stores that open or expand in food deserts — defined as low-income census tracts more than 1 mile from a supermarket in urban areas or 10 miles in rural areas; (2) condition federal Community Development Block Grant funding on states and localities enacting zoning policies that: (a) limit the density of dollar stores, fast food restaurants, and liquor stores in food deserts; (b) require any new dollar store or discount retailer above 5,000 square feet in a food desert to stock a minimum percentage of fresh produce and refrigerated food; (3) expand SNAP incentives — doubling SNAP benefits for purchases of fresh fruits and vegetables through the Double Up Food Bucks model, funded at $1 billion annually; (4) require all USDA-regulated school nutrition programs to source at least 30% of food from local and regional farms within 250 miles of the school; and (5) establish a federal Food Environment Equity Index that publicly tracks healthy food access by census tract, updated annually, with mandatory remediation plans for persistent food deserts.
An estimated 23.5 million Americans live in food deserts with limited access to fresh, affordable food. Dollar stores have been documented to deliberately open near or drive out full-service grocery stores in low-income communities.
ENV-TRNS-001
Proposal
Every Worker Employed in Coal Mining, Oil and Gas Extraction, Petroleum Refining, or Coal-Fired Power Generation Whose Job Is Eliminated Due to Clean Energy Transition Must Receive 5 Years of Full Wage Replacement, Lifetime Healthcare, and Full Pension Vesting
Congress must establish a Federal Just Transition Program — requiring: (1) wage replacement — any worker displaced from covered fossil fuel employment due to facility closure, production reduction, or any federal clean energy policy shall receive: (a) 100% of pre-displacement wages for 3 years; (b) 75% of pre-displacement wages for years 4–5; (c) job training and placement services through the Department of Labor for the full 5-year period; (2) healthcare continuation — displaced workers and their dependents shall receive: (a) continuation of any employer-provided healthcare coverage at no cost to the worker for 5 years; (b) enrollment in a federal healthcare bridge program equivalent to Federal Employee Health Benefits (FEHB) coverage if no employer plan exists; (3) pension security — any defined benefit pension or multiemployer pension plan covering displaced workers shall be: (a) fully vested upon displacement, regardless of years of service; (b) eligible for federal benefit guarantee if the plan is underfunded due to employer insolvency; (c) supplemented by the federal government to ensure no worker receives less than 80% of the benefit they would have earned at full retirement; (4) community transition funds — every county that loses more than 500 fossil fuel jobs within any 3-year period shall receive an economic transition grant of: (a) $50,000 per displaced worker for community economic development; (b) priority access to federal infrastructure contracts; (c) federal tax incentives for clean energy manufacturing investment in the county for 15 years; (5) administered by a newly created Office of Just Transition within the Department of Labor, with criminal penalties for any contractor or employer who falsifies displacement claims or misappropriates transition funds.
Approximately 900,000 Americans are employed in fossil fuel extraction, refining, and coal-fired power generation. Coal-producing communities have historically faced devastating economic collapse when mines close without adequate transition support.
ENV-TRNS-002
Proposal
Clean Energy Developers Receiving Federal Incentives Must Prioritize Hiring From Fossil Fuel Communities and Contribute to Community Reinvestment Funds — And Fossil Fuel Companies Must Fund Remediation of All Abandoned Wells, Mines, and Contaminated Sites Before Receiving Any New Permits
Congress must: (1) require all clean energy projects receiving federal tax credits, grants, or loan guarantees to: (a) give hiring preference to workers with prior employment in fossil fuel industries; (b) pay prevailing wage on all construction and operations; (c) contribute 2% of project revenue for the first 15 years to a Community Reinvestment Fund for the county where the project is located; (2) establish a Fossil Fuel Cleanup Liability Fund — requiring all oil and gas companies with more than $100 million in annual revenue to contribute 0.5% of gross revenue annually until: (a) all orphaned wells on federal land are plugged and remediated; (b) all abandoned coal mines in their operational history are fully reclaimed; (c) all Superfund sites associated with their operations are fully remediated; (3) prohibit any oil, gas, or coal company from receiving a new extraction permit on federal land if the company has any outstanding well-plugging, mine reclamation, or Superfund remediation obligations more than 3 years past due; (4) require the Bureau of Land Management and the EPA to jointly publish an annual National Fossil Fuel Liability Register — listing all companies with outstanding remediation obligations and their estimated costs; (5) criminal penalties — fines up to $100 million and imprisonment up to 10 years for executives — for any fossil fuel company that abandons extraction operations without completing required remediation; and (6) a private right of action for any community within 5 miles of an abandoned fossil fuel site to sue for full remediation costs plus consequential damages.
There are an estimated 3.2 million documented orphaned oil and gas wells in the United States, with hundreds of thousands leaking methane and contaminating groundwater. Abandoned coal mines have left hundreds of communities with acid mine drainage, land subsidence, and contaminated water supplies.
ENVR-FFEX-0001
Proposal
Congress Must Enact a Complete Federal Ban on Hydraulic Fracturing, Directional Drilling for Shale Gas, and All Unconventional Fossil Fuel Extraction Methods on Federal Lands Within 2 Years, With a Full National Phase-Out Within 10 Years
Hydraulic fracturing ("fracking") — high-pressure injection of water and chemicals into rock to release oil and gas — must be immediately banned on federal public lands, with a complete national phase-out within 10 years. Fracking pollutes groundwater, releases methane, and locks in decades of additional fossil fuel dependence.
Congress must: (1) impose an immediate moratorium on all new permits for hydraulic fracturing, horizontal drilling, and all unconventional oil and gas extraction on federal lands and waters — effective within 60 days of enactment; (2) establish a 10-year national phase-out of all fracking operations — including on private lands — requiring all existing wells to cease operation by 2035; (3) require full environmental remediation of all fracking sites including groundwater testing, well plugging, and soil decontamination at the operator's expense; (4) mandate that all communities within 3 miles of an active or former fracking site receive free annual water and air quality testing for 20 years; (5) prohibit the export of fracked natural gas via LNG terminals after 2030; (6) criminal penalties — fines up to $50 million per violation and imprisonment up to 15 years — for any operator who continues operating after the phase-out deadline; and (7) a private right of action for any resident who can demonstrate health or property damage caused by fracking operations, with damages equal to all medical costs, property devaluation, and remediation costs plus punitive damages plus attorney's fees.
Fracking has been linked to groundwater contamination, increased seismic activity, and significant methane leakage — a greenhouse gas 80 times more potent than CO2 over 20 years. Studies have documented measurable health impacts on communities within 1–3 miles of fracking operations.
ENVR-FFEX-0002
Proposal
Congress Must Enact a Complete Phase-Out of All Coal-Fired Power Generation by 2030, All Coal Mining Operations by 2035, and Provide Federally Funded Just Transition Support for All Displaced Workers and Communities
Coal is the most polluting energy source and must be fully phased out — no coal-fired power by 2030, no coal mining by 2035. Workers and communities that have depended on coal must receive federally funded support to build new livelihoods.
Congress must: (1) prohibit all new permits for coal-fired power plants — effective immediately; (2) require all existing coal-fired power plants to cease operations by December 31, 2030; (3) require all coal mining operations — surface mining, mountaintop removal, and underground mining — to cease by December 31, 2035; (4) establish a Coal Community Transition Fund — capitalized at $200 billion over 10 years — providing: (a) 5 years of wage replacement at 100% of prior earnings for all displaced coal workers; (b) free retraining and education for alternative employment in renewable energy, manufacturing, or healthcare; (c) full pension protection and healthcare coverage continuity for all retired and active coal workers; (d) economic development grants to coal-dependent communities; (5) require full reclamation and environmental remediation of all mine sites including acid mine drainage treatment; (6) criminal penalties — fines up to $100 million per facility and imprisonment up to 20 years — for operating a coal plant or mine beyond the deadline; and (7) a private right of action for any community downstream or downwind of a coal facility that suffers documented health or property harms.
Coal combustion is responsible for approximately 20% of U.S. carbon dioxide emissions and is linked to thousands of premature deaths annually from air pollution. Mountaintop removal mining has permanently buried approximately 2,000 miles of Appalachian streams.
ENVR-FFEX-0003
Proposal
Congress Must Enact a Permanent Moratorium on All New Offshore Oil and Gas Drilling in U.S. Federal Waters, Accelerate the Phase-Out of Existing Offshore Operations, and End All Federal Fossil Fuel Subsidies Within 4 Years
A permanent ban on all new offshore oil and gas drilling must be enacted, existing offshore operations phased out, and over $20 billion in annual federal fossil fuel subsidies eliminated within four years. Public waters and public money must not continue funding an industry the world must move beyond.
Congress must: (1) impose a permanent moratorium on all new offshore oil and gas drilling leases in all U.S. federal waters including the Gulf of Mexico, Atlantic, Pacific, and Arctic — effective immediately; (2) prohibit the renewal or extension of any existing offshore drilling lease after December 31, 2030; (3) require the phase-out of all existing offshore oil and gas production by December 31, 2035, with an accelerated phase-out in Arctic waters by 2028; (4) end all federal fossil fuel subsidies — including intangible drilling cost deductions, percentage depletion allowances, and manufacturing tax deductions for fossil fuel companies — within 4 years, redirecting those revenues to the renewable energy transition fund; (5) establish strict liability for all offshore drilling operators for any spill regardless of cause — with no cap on damages; (6) require all offshore operators to post cleanup bonds of at least $10 billion before commencing any operation; (7) criminal penalties — fines up to $1 billion per spill and imprisonment up to 25 years — for any operator who knowingly conceals a spill or disables safety equipment; and (8) a private right of action for any coastal community, fishery, or individual who suffers economic or environmental harm from any offshore drilling operation.
The U.S. government provides an estimated $20 billion or more annually in direct and indirect subsidies to fossil fuel companies. The 2010 Deepwater Horizon spill released approximately 4.9 million barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico, causing billions of dollars in damage to coastal economies and ecosystems.
ENVR-GNDS-0001
Proposal
Congress Must Establish a Federal Mandate for 100% Clean, Renewable, and Zero-Emission Electricity Generation Across All U.S. Utilities by 2035, With Interim Milestones, Federal Investment, and Binding Enforcement
By 2035, every electric utility in the country must generate 100% of its power from clean, zero-emission sources — wind, solar, hydropower, and others. Clean electricity is the foundation for decarbonizing the entire economy, and this mandate sets binding interim milestones backed by federal investment and enforcement.
Congress must: (1) establish a 100% Clean Electricity Standard requiring all retail electricity suppliers to generate or procure 100% of their electricity from zero-emission sources — including solar, wind, geothermal, hydropower, and storage — by December 31, 2035; (2) set interim milestones of 50% by 2027 and 80% by 2031; (3) establish a Federal Clean Energy Investment Fund — capitalized at $1 trillion over 10 years — to: (a) finance utility-scale renewable energy projects in underserved and rural areas; (b) fund residential and commercial rooftop solar and energy efficiency upgrades with priority for low-income households; (c) build out interstate high-voltage transmission infrastructure to connect renewable generation to demand centers; (4) require all federal agencies and military installations to achieve 100% renewable electricity by 2030; (5) financial penalties of $500 per megawatt-hour above the clean energy threshold for any utility that fails interim milestones; (6) criminal penalties — fines up to $500 million and imprisonment up to 10 years — for any utility executive who falsifies clean energy compliance data; and (7) a private right of action for any ratepayer in a non-compliant utility territory for damages plus full attorney's fees.
The clean energy sector already employs more workers than the fossil fuel industry in the United States. Studies indicate that a rapid transition to renewable energy could create millions of new jobs while reducing electricity costs over the long term.
ENVR-GNDS-0002
Proposal
Congress Must Invest $500 Billion Over 10 Years in Green Infrastructure — Including Zero-Emission Public Transit, Clean Building Retrofits, and Urban Tree Canopy — With at Least 40% of All Investment Directed to Frontline and Environmental Justice Communities
$500 billion in federal investment over 10 years must build zero-emission public transit, retrofit existing buildings for energy efficiency, and expand urban tree canopy — with at least 40% directed to frontline communities that have historically borne the worst pollution while benefiting least from public investment.
Congress must: (1) establish the Green Infrastructure Investment Act — providing $500 billion over 10 years for: (a) zero-emission public transit systems including electric buses, light rail, and intercity rail with priority for communities lacking transportation access; (b) deep energy retrofits of all public buildings — schools, hospitals, and government facilities — to achieve net-zero emissions by 2035; (c) a federal program to retrofit all residential units for low- and moderate-income households — including insulation, heat pumps, and weatherization — at no cost to the household; (d) urban tree canopy expansion, green stormwater infrastructure, and urban heat island mitigation with priority for historically redlined neighborhoods; (e) wetland and coastal ecosystem restoration to provide natural carbon sequestration and climate resilience; (2) require that at least 40% of all green infrastructure investment flows to frontline environmental justice communities — defined as communities with above-average pollution burden and below-average income — enforced through annual federal audits; (3) require all green infrastructure projects to use Davis-Bacon prevailing wage and to prioritize local hiring; (4) penalties of 150% of misdirected funds plus criminal penalties for any federal administrator who diverts environmental justice funds; and (5) a private right of action for any environmental justice community that is denied its proportionate share of investment.
Studies show that low-income communities and communities of color bear disproportionate burdens from pollution and are least able to adapt to climate change impacts. Urban heat islands in historically redlined neighborhoods can be 5–12 degrees hotter than wealthier neighborhoods with more tree canopy.
ENVR-GNDS-0003
Proposal
Congress Must Impose a Federal Methane Tax on All Natural Gas Operations, Require All Natural Gas Utilities to Transition to Alternatives by 2040, and End All New Natural Gas Pipeline Construction Within 2 Years
Natural gas — mostly methane, a potent greenhouse gas — must be phased out of homes and utilities. A federal methane tax on gas operations, a mandate for gas utilities to transition customers to electric alternatives by 2040, and a ban on new gas pipeline construction within two years are all required to make this happen.
Congress must: (1) impose a federal methane emissions fee — starting at $900 per ton of methane in 2026 and increasing to $1,500 per ton by 2030 — on all upstream oil and gas operations, pipeline operators, and LNG facilities; (2) impose an immediate moratorium on all new natural gas pipeline permits, new LNG export facility permits, and new natural gas power plant construction; (3) require all natural gas distribution utilities to develop and file with federal regulators a plan to transition all residential, commercial, and industrial customers to electric alternatives — including heat pumps, induction cooktops, and electric water heaters — by December 31, 2040; (4) prohibit all new residential and commercial construction from installing natural gas appliances or connections after January 1, 2027; (5) establish a Federal Gas Utility Transition Fund — capitalized at $100 billion — to provide no-cost electrification retrofits for low-income households currently using natural gas; (6) criminal penalties — fines up to $50 million per violation and imprisonment up to 15 years — for any utility that knowingly misreports methane emissions data; and (7) a private right of action for any community that demonstrates measurable health harms from methane or associated air pollutants.
Methane is approximately 80 times more potent as a greenhouse gas than CO2 over a 20-year period. Studies have found that natural gas cooking appliances emit nitrogen dioxide and other pollutants at levels exceeding EPA outdoor air quality standards inside homes.
ENVR-PLTR-0001
Proposal
Congress Must Abolish the Poultry and Livestock "Tournament" Ranking System That Determines Grower Pay by Comparison Against Neighbors — And Establish Minimum Contract Standards Protecting Farmers From Corporate Retaliation
The tournament system pays poultry contract farmers by comparing their flock performance against neighbors — a ranking that companies can manipulate through unequal input supplies. This system must be abolished and replaced with pay based on objective, transparent, independently verifiable performance criteria.
Congress must: (1) amend the Packers and Stockyards Act to explicitly prohibit tournament or ranking systems where grower compensation is determined by comparing performance against neighboring growers in the same flock cycle — finding such systems to be an unfair and deceptive practice; (2) require all poultry and livestock integrators to pay growers on an objective, non-comparative basis based on the grower's own documented inputs and performance; (3) establish federal minimum contract standards: (a) minimum 5-year contract term with renewal rights; (b) 180-day termination notice; (c) itemized breakdown of all required capital upgrades and company contributions; (d) prohibition on mandatory upgrades in final 2 years of contract; (e) no pre-dispute mandatory arbitration; (4) require integrators to provide growers access to all flock and production data used to calculate pay; (5) USDA civil penalties up to $1 million per violation per contract cycle; (6) criminal penalties — fines up to $10 million and imprisonment up to 10 years — for any integrator executive who retaliates against a grower for filing a USDA complaint; and (7) a private right of action for any grower subjected to a prohibited tournament system or retaliatory termination.
The top four poultry companies control approximately 54% of the U.S. broiler chicken market. Contract chicken farmers can be required to invest hundreds of thousands of dollars in equipment upgrades under threat of contract termination.
Environmental policy has historically treated pollution, conservation, and resource management as separate domains. The Clean Air Act addresses air pollution, the Clean Water Act addresses water contamination, the Endangered Species Act addresses biodiversity loss, but these are implemented through separate agencies with limited coordination. This fragmentation enables harm-shifting: reducing air emissions by shifting to processes that increase water contamination, protecting individual species without addressing habitat fragmentation, addressing point-source pollution while ignoring diffuse agricultural runoff.
A systems approach recognizes that environmental harms are interconnected. Air pollution contributes to climate change which disrupts ecosystems and threatens biodiversity. Water contamination from agricultural runoff creates dead zones in rivers and coastal areas. Habitat fragmentation from infrastructure development disrupts ecosystem function and accelerates species loss. Light pollution disrupts wildlife behavior (bird migration, insect reproduction, predator-prey relationships)[6] and interferes with astronomical observation. Noise pollution from data centers, highways, and industrial operations degrades quality of life and disrupts wildlife communication and navigation. Space debris from satellite deployments threatens functional satellites and future space access. Each of these harms imposes costs that are not reflected in market prices, creating systematic underpricing of environmental destruction.
The concept of "pollution" must expand beyond traditional toxins to include noise, light, orbital debris, and other forms of environmental degradation that impose costs on others. Noise pollution from highways, airports, industrial facilities, and data centers (including AI data centers with loud cooling systems) disrupts sleep, increases stress, and degrades property values. Strong national standards with monitoring and enforcement prevent localities from becoming sacrifice zones where industry externalizes noise costs onto residents. Light pollution from excessive outdoor lighting disrupts ecosystems (bird migration routes are thrown off by urban light, insect populations collapse from attraction to artificial light, nocturnal predators lose hunting advantages) and interferes with astronomical research (ground-based telescopes are increasingly unusable due to light pollution). National standards for outdoor lighting (shielding, intensity limits, timing controls) reduce these harms without eliminating necessary illumination.
Wildlife migration and habitat continuity are critical to ecosystem function. Many species require large territories or migrate seasonally between breeding and feeding grounds. When highways, railways, and urban development fragment habitats, they isolate populations, reduce genetic diversity, and disrupt ecosystem functions like seed dispersal and nutrient cycling. Wildlife crossings — bridges, tunnels, and underpasses designed for animal passage — reconnect fragmented habitats. These are cost-effective: a wildlife overpass costs $3–5 million but prevents millions in vehicle-wildlife collisions, preserves ecosystem function, and maintains biodiversity.[4] Infrastructure planning must incorporate wildlife crossing requirements where highways or railways disrupt migration routes.
Corporate environmental accountability requires addressing greenwashing — misleading environmental claims that allow companies to gain competitive advantage without reducing harm. "Carbon neutral" claims often rely on questionable offsets (paying to plant trees that may not survive or that would have been planted anyway) rather than reducing emissions. "Sustainable" labels are applied to products with destructive supply chains. "Eco-friendly" branding is used for products with marginal environmental improvements while ignoring larger impacts. Effective anti-greenwashing requires three elements: prohibition of false, misleading, or selectively incomplete environmental claims; standardized environmental reporting using verifiable metrics; and enforcement mechanisms with meaningful penalties for violations. Companies must disclose full environmental impact (energy use, water consumption, emissions, waste generation, supply chain impacts) using standardized metrics that enable comparison and prevent selective reporting.
Regenerative agriculture is a transition away from extractive industrial farming toward practices that build long-term productivity. Industrial agriculture depletes soil through monoculture and heavy tillage, requires increasing chemical inputs to maintain yields, contaminates groundwater with pesticides and fertilizers, and contributes significantly to greenhouse gas emissions.[5] Regenerative agriculture uses practices like cover cropping (keeping soil covered year-round to prevent erosion and build organic matter), crop rotation (alternating crops to break pest cycles and improve soil health), reduced tillage (minimizing soil disturbance to preserve structure and microbial life), and integrated livestock (using grazing animals to cycle nutrients and manage vegetation). These practices build soil organic matter, increase water retention, sequester carbon, support biodiversity, reduce chemical inputs, and improve long-term yields. Transitioning requires policy support: research funding for regenerative techniques, technical assistance for farmers, market incentives for regenerative products, elimination of subsidies that favor monoculture commodity production, and support for farmers during the transition period when yields may temporarily decrease.
The labor rules grouped with environmental policy (LAB-WRK-001, LAB-WRK-002, LAB-WRK-003) reflect the interconnection between environmental and labor justice. Environmental harms disproportionately impact workers: farmworkers are exposed to pesticides, industrial workers face toxic chemicals, low-income communities are located near polluting facilities. Environmental justice requires addressing these disparities. The 4-day work week and productivity-sharing from automation also connect to environmental sustainability: reducing working hours reduces consumption pressure and enables time for non-market activities like civic participation, community building, and environmental stewardship. When productivity gains from AI and automation are captured entirely by capital rather than shared with workers through reduced hours, it drives consumption-based growth that increases environmental pressure. Sharing productivity gains through reduced working hours without pay reduction enables sustainable prosperity rather than endless growth.
The education rules (EDU-FIN-001, EDU-STD-001) connect to environmental policy through educational content and access. Student loan debt forces graduates into high-paying jobs regardless of social value, reducing capacity for environmental work, public service, or community organizing. Debt relief enables career choices aligned with social and environmental priorities. Anti-indoctrination protections ensure that education includes accurate environmental science without political interference — critical for developing the informed citizenry necessary for environmental governance.
Orbital space is an emerging environmental domain. Satellite constellations like Starlink (planned for 40,000+ satellites) create multiple harms: space debris from collisions and failed satellites threatens functional satellites and future space access; satellite light pollution interferes with astronomical observation (streaks across telescope images, radio interference with radio telescopes); orbital debris accumulates without natural removal mechanisms. Rules for orbital sanitation (debris removal, de-orbiting requirements for defunct satellites), satellite deployment standards (environmental and scientific impact assessments before approval, limits on constellation size, coordination with astronomical community), and orbital safety requirements prevent the replication of terrestrial environmental failures in space. This is not anti-technology — it is ensuring that space development is sustainable rather than creating an orbital debris field that makes space unusable.
One critical question is the relationship between environmental protection and economic development. Industry arguments against regulation consistently claim that environmental protections destroy jobs and economic growth. Historical evidence contradicts this: the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act produced enormous public health benefits while the economy continued to grow.[7] Pollution controls force internalization of costs that were previously externalized, creating a level playing field where companies cannot gain advantage by poisoning communities. Regenerative agriculture is more labor-intensive than industrial agriculture but produces higher-value products and builds long-term productivity. Wildlife crossings prevent millions in vehicle-collision costs. The choice is not between environment and economy but between sustainable prosperity and extractive decline.
Another critical question is enforcement. Environmental regulations are only effective if they are monitored and enforced. Industry systematically underfunds enforcement by lobbying to reduce agency budgets, challenging regulations in court, and gaming reporting requirements. Effective enforcement requires adequate agency funding, whistleblower protections, citizen suit provisions allowing public enforcement where agencies fail to act, and meaningful penalties that exceed the cost of compliance.
This pillar connects to multiple other policy domains: infrastructure (transportation, energy, water systems), public health (air and water quality impacts), economic policy (subsidies, market incentives, pricing mechanisms), technology (monitoring systems, renewable energy), and democratic accountability (transparency, public participation in environmental decisions).